Percentage Of Cashes For 45/90 Man Turbos

[Chet Chetterson 0]

What percentage of SNG's should I be cashing in for 45 or 90 man turbos on Stars? I have cashed 9 out of 40 times so far (22.5%). Would ROI be a better indicator even with the small sample size?

[bigbluffzinc 0]

I just started the 90 man's and my roi for those is slightly higher.. i think im hitting over a 40% roi for 90 - 180 man's but my results are skewed by donking chips in 9 - 27 man's trying to improve my short handed play... you'd also need to include a buy in as the stakes clearly affect your results.. at higher stakes a 25% roi would be sick for 90 man's, i play low/micro where thats not as impressive....

[MaxStPolish 4]

What percentage of SNG's should I be cashing in for 45 or 90 man turbos on Stars? I have cashed 9 out of 40 times so far (22.5%). Would ROI be a better indicator even with the small sample size?

If a brag post, congrats!!As a question, I don't think there's a question here. It's all about your goal setting and what you think you can reasonably accomplish. Obviously a 22.5% cash rate on these is pretty solid....but I don't think someone could really quantify what would be a good percent "to be cashing in" is.Those usually pay out top 10%, so theoritically, you should be cashing 10% of the time, with anything above that being acceptable. Then again as you note ROI is the really barometer for this as far as "success" goes.

[Chet Chetterson 0]

If a brag post, congrats!!As a question, I don't think there's a question here. It's all about your goal setting and what you think you can reasonably accomplish. Obviously a 22.5% cash rate on these is pretty solid....but I don't think someone could really quantify what would be a good percent "to be cashing in" is.Those usually pay out top 10%, so theoritically, you should be cashing 10% of the time, with anything above that being acceptable. Then again as you note ROI is the really barometer for this as far as "success" goes.

@zinc I play 1.10's@Max So what would a good ROI be in your opinion? This isn't meant to be a brag post, I'm just not sure whether this could be sustainable or if I am just on a heater statistically.

[MaxStPolish 4]

@zinc I play 1.10's@Max So what would a good ROI be in your opinion? This isn't meant to be a brag post, I'm just not sure whether this could be sustainable or if I am just on a heater statistically.

Honestly, I have no clue. Honestly a 1% ROI is good IMO because you are succeeding. Obv a 700% ROI would be preferred. I guess that's what my point was in the prior post. It all depends on the player I'd guess. A really good player honed in on the specific game type could probably yield a 50-100% ROI over a pretty large sample in these 90 person tournies. That's why I contend that your question is much more of a personal goal question. Sure 22.5% cash rates are sustainable....but I'd bet on it being a heater for anyone with a sample of 40 games rather than the norm. You need to be pretty very good to cash 1/4 times in tournies that 1/10 people cash and plan to sustain that for the 'long haul'. It's definitely possible....but just not probable. Just my thoughts.

[bigbluffzinc 0]

Ok if you're playing micro stakes then the above post is pretty on the money... if you're not losing then congrats, because most players lose... i didnt think it was a brag post i think you were looking for where you stand compared to other successful players, and a 1% roi over the next however long means you can gamble for a small profit which is fine (again depending on your goals), you know you're doing well when your roi is above 0%, but i would re-evaluate after 100+ games at the same stakes and see if you notice a consistent trend of winning or if you really just got lucky... Since i tend to multi table the micro games on stars for a small profit when im bored feel free to msg me if you have anything specific you want to know...

[Chet Chetterson 0]

Ok if you're playing micro stakes then the above post is pretty on the money... if you're not losing then congrats, because most players lose... i didnt think it was a brag post i think you were looking for where you stand compared to other successful players, and a 1% roi over the next however long means you can gamble for a small profit which is fine (again depending on your goals), you know you're doing well when your roi is above 0%, but i would re-evaluate after 100+ games at the same stakes and see if you notice a consistent trend of winning or if you really just got lucky... Since i tend to multi table the micro games on stars for a small profit when im bored feel free to msg me if you have anything specific you want to know...

Thanks for the offer. I post a bunch of hands in the Tournament Play section. You should definitely post more often. The more posters the better it is for the forums.