You know what I've been thinking lately? I see how winning a championship springboards certain secondary players into superstar status and wonder if it would've happened without the championship and primary star.For instance...Wade a a good player until Shaq came to Miami and won a championship. He went from a star guard to this sick monster. You could say the same about Kobe too.I never thought Tony Parker would be the player he is today and I think Duncan/Spurs has a lot to do with it.Rondo seems to be benefiting in the same way.Would these players be the same players they are today without the championship? Would their confidence be as strong if opposing teams had guarded them harder while developing into the allstar they are now?
Is Greatness Based On Confidence Of A Championship?
Started by fleung22, Apr 29 2009 07:03 AM
6 replies to this topic
#2
Posted 29 April 2009 - 07:55 AM
Wade was already a star, he was just overlooked because of the other people in his draft class. Remember how everyone was all over Lebron and Anthony like they were supposed to be the next Bird/Magic rivalry. Anyone who watched Wade and Carmelo in college knew Wade had more game. The finals was just a springboard to name recognition since Wade carried the team, not Shaq. Parker and Rondo are more interesting cases though. I don't think winning a championship made them better players as much as just getting playoff experience and playing with some other really talented players did. Just like a lot of the players who were on the US team this year have gotten better and had their best seasons. They learned from being around other top level players.
#3
Posted 29 April 2009 - 08:48 AM
What you are overlooking is that all three players you reference as evidence (Wade, Parker and Rondo) were all young when they won that first title. I am sure a championship experience helped.....but it is probably secondary to the natural evolution of a player. And anyone who watched the Heat in Wade's rookie year knew he was special well before Shaq showed up (and please stop overrating Shaq on the 2006 Heat title sqaud.....he was BARELY their 2nd best player.....that was a team that succeeded because they had one star (Wade) and a bunch of other guys who could step up and contribute on any given night....some nights it was Shaq, some it was Toine or Posey or J-Will or Zo or Haslem.....well you get the picture....anyone who thinks that Shaq "got" them that title was not watching the same games I was.)
"Give a little bit.....give a little bit of your chips to me...."
#4
Posted 29 April 2009 - 04:12 PM
Referees, Referees, Referees...Todays NBA is so warped you'd never win a champ without someone to get you the star calls..Period..It's in-arguable.The league refuses to release the ref assignments for each playoff game until the day of the game. I'm not the tin-foil hat type, but i'm sure an earlier leak of that info would cause for some hilarious betting line swings.You could make a living taking the road team and the points if you knew Joey Crawford was in town for the evening.
QUOTE (El Guapo @ Thursday, April 30th, 2009, 10:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Whatever angle it is, i am pretty sure it will be obtuse.
QUOTE (David_Sklansky @ Thursday, February 12th, 2009, 7:38 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I give you the gift of arousal and this is how you talk to me?
#5
Posted 29 April 2009 - 04:21 PM
It's definitely true that the major NBA story of Wade's rookie year was - Wow looking how f ing good Dwayne Wade isI personally attribute most of Wade's success to being one of Charles Barkley's fave 5
#7
Posted 30 April 2009 - 06:42 AM
fleung22, on Wednesday, April 29th, 2009, 10:03 AM, said:
You know what I've been thinking lately? I see how winning a championship springboards certain secondary players into superstar status and wonder if it would've happened without the championship and primary star.
QUOTE (dscoot @ Friday, April 10th, 2009, 3:20 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
im still not sold that many of these people that get these big online scores are winners when it comes to the live game, which, by the way, is real poker.
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










