In AC where I play they spread a $6-$12 LH game and a $10-$20 LH game. The 6-12 game is raked, 10% of the pot to a max of $4. The 10-20 game is time charge, $5 per half hour. The 6-12 game tends to be much looser, and certainly more fishy than the 10 game. I've beat both games when I've played them, but don't have enough data to work out a reliable BB/hr. ratio to base this on. If I can make over 1BB per hour in the 6-12 due to looser weaker play will this game become more profitable with the savings in time charge?
rake vs. time in a live game?
Started by yeffy, May 18 2005 02:18 PM
2 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 18 May 2005 - 02:18 PM
#2
Posted 18 May 2005 - 02:21 PM
If your 1BB/hr is after rake, stay there.$12/hr is better than $10/hr ($20 for 1BB/hr at 10/20 - $10 time charge).
"I'd root for Hellmuth against my Mother if I knew Phil was holding the Krablar." -- BigDMcGee
"Poker is 98% luck, I'm trying to make it 97.8% luck. " -- JFarrell20, deported village idiot
"Poker is 98% luck, I'm trying to make it 97.8% luck. " -- JFarrell20, deported village idiot
#3
Posted 18 May 2005 - 02:29 PM
cdddc75 said:
If your 1BB/hr is after rake, stay there.$12/hr is better than $10/hr ($20 for 1BB/hr at 10/20 - $10 time charge).
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









