Jump to content


Top Pair Nut Flush Draw


  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

#1 droberts

droberts

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 637 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:usa
  • Interests:my family, hunting, fishing, and of course, poker.
  • Favorite Poker Game:texas holdem

Posted 23 February 2009 - 02:18 AM

Im new this to site, but i like the insight players give to other players. I have a few hands that occured to me earlier today and wanted to know how to proceed in them.

Table is semi-loose but that seems normal for .05/.10 NL holdem. First hand I am UTG and raise to .35 with AcJc. BB calls and we see flop of Ad Qc 4c. BB started hand with about $7 and I had about $5. BB leads for .50 and i raise to 1.50. BB thinks for about 10 seconds and then raises all in. Is this an autocall because i have outs no matter if he has set or 2 pair?

Next hand i had Ad 9d and was UTG+1 and raised to .30. Two MPs called as well as SB. Flop was Ah Kd Jd. SB checks I bet .60 and MP1 raises to 1.50 and then MP2 reraises to 4. SB thinks for a little while then moves all in for around $8. I started hand with about $6, MP1 has $10,and MP2 has $14. Do i call all in here or assume that one of them also has flush draw and some of my outs are gone?

Thanks for the help. Hope to post more hands to get insight.

#2 pokerinc

pokerinc

    insomniac

  • Members
  • 1,638 posts

Posted 23 February 2009 - 02:33 AM

get it in w/ both hands. Raise pre flop the same in both hands, and top up to 100bbs pre flop.

w/ your stack size these are snap shove/calls.
Now working and pokering. It's like two incomes in one.
UFC July 4th weekend. Vegas!

#3 LJB723

LJB723

    What do you see?

  • Members
  • 1,753 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dundee, Scotland
  • Interests:Aside from poker - hockey (ice and field), football (soccer), rugby, cricket, sport in general really
  • Favorite Poker Game:NLHE, PLO, Badugi

Posted 23 February 2009 - 05:07 AM

Shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiip 'em both.
The whores and politicians will look up and shout "save us!"

And I will whisper "no"

- Rorschach

#4 mtdesmoines

mtdesmoines

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 9,939 posts

Posted 23 February 2009 - 08:30 AM

QUOTE (droberts @ Monday, February 23rd, 2009, 2:18 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Im new this to site, but i like the insight players give to other players. I have a few hands that occured to me earlier today and wanted to know how to proceed in them.

Table is semi-loose but that seems normal for .05/.10 NL holdem. First hand I am UTG and raise to .35 with AcJc. BB calls and we see flop of Ad Qc 4c. BB started hand with about $7 and I had about $5. BB leads for .50 and i raise to 1.50. BB thinks for about 10 seconds and then raises all in. Is this an autocall because i have outs no matter if he has set or 2 pair?

Next hand i had Ad 9d and was UTG+1 and raised to .30. Two MPs called as well as SB. Flop was Ah Kd Jd. SB checks I bet .60 and MP1 raises to 1.50 and then MP2 reraises to 4. SB thinks for a little while then moves all in for around $8. I started hand with about $6, MP1 has $10,and MP2 has $14. Do i call all in here or assume that one of them also has flush draw and some of my outs are gone?

Thanks for the help. Hope to post more hands to get insight.



shove
shove

pokerizez

a lot of times in these spots, you will see naked flush draws and since there are no overs to your pair, you will be dominating dominating dominating. and you aren't dead to a single hand you will see turned up.
Somewhere Jimmy Carter is smiling because he knows that he is no longer the worst President of the modern era

#5 gooch

gooch

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,247 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Whistler
  • Interests:Things that end in &quot;ing&quot;.
  • Favorite Poker Game:NL Hold'em, PLO

Posted 23 February 2009 - 10:42 AM

push it real good
shameless plug for traffic, it's a poker blog Judy, not a fishing site
http://areallybigfish.com/

#6 highsociety3

highsociety3

    Poker Forum Newbie

  • Members
  • 2 posts
  • Favorite Poker Game:NLHE

Posted 23 February 2009 - 12:43 PM

first hand, no question you get em all in there. if you fold there, you aren't playing poker right.

second hand, you are clearly beat on the flop, but with that nut draw you are def priced in to call, whenever you have two other people going along with you in a flush draw situation you are essentially guaranteed the right pot odds... it might be reasonable to think that two of your outs are gone to another guy, but you also don't know if another A or 9 is an added out (which they may be).

both these situations look like + EV call/shoves.




#7 SpatsJ

SpatsJ

    Poker Forum Regular

  • Members
  • 124 posts

Posted 23 February 2009 - 01:23 PM

jumping on the bandwagon here. insta shove both hands. you have 2 many outs to fold.

#8 All_In

All_In

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,198 posts
  • Location:ON
  • Interests:Poker, Golf, Poker, Guitar, Poker, etc...

Posted 02 March 2009 - 10:41 AM

i have a question about the second hand, is it normally OK to raise UTG+1 with A-Xs??
I don't need to be a global citizen because I'm blessed by nationality I'm member of a growing populace we enforce our popularity I feel sorry for the earth's population 'cuz so few live in the U.S.A. At least the foreigners can copy our morality they can visit but they cannot stay Only precious few can garner the prosperity it makes us walk with renewed confidence He's the farmers barren fields the force the army wields The expression in the faces of the starving millions The power of the man he's the fuel that drives the clan He's the motive and conscience of the murderer He's the preacher on t.v. the false sincerity The form letter that's written by the big computers He's the nuclear bombs and the kids with no moms

#9 SCS

SCS

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,771 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Folsom, CA

Posted 02 March 2009 - 11:23 AM

QUOTE (All_In @ Monday, March 2nd, 2009, 1:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
i have a question about the second hand, is it normally OK to raise UTG+1 with A-Xs??



Depends on table, and your postflop abilities.

You can apply that statement to any hand.


#10 gooch

gooch

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,247 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Whistler
  • Interests:Things that end in &quot;ing&quot;.
  • Favorite Poker Game:NL Hold'em, PLO

Posted 02 March 2009 - 01:06 PM

QUOTE (SCS @ Monday, March 2nd, 2009, 11:23 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Depends on table, and your postflop abilities.

You can apply that statement to any hand.


you have to be able to lay down ace flops to resistance when you don't hit your kicker, if you can't, then don't do it imo
shameless plug for traffic, it's a poker blog Judy, not a fishing site
http://areallybigfish.com/

#11 All_In

All_In

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,198 posts
  • Location:ON
  • Interests:Poker, Golf, Poker, Guitar, Poker, etc...

Posted 02 March 2009 - 01:15 PM

QUOTE (gooch @ Monday, March 2nd, 2009, 2:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
you have to be able to lay down ace flops to resistance when you don't hit your kicker, if you can't, then don't do it imo

i know u r supposed to play tighter in EP, so it kinda confuses me why raising in EP w/ A-Xs is not considered a standard -EV play. I can see limping, but raising?

This may be wrong, but I would think limping is a better option since you will likely get the suited connectors joining in. You can bust them with your nut flush vs their small flush. Does this happen so rarely that it is not a relevant strategy?

Limping may also make people think that you have a big pair, and are playing the 'standard way', limping in EP hoping to re-raise someone PF. So if the flop comes ragged and you bet out, or maybe even re-raise a bet by the blinds, you will take it down most of the time. Again, is this incorrect thinking?

Thanks!
I don't need to be a global citizen because I'm blessed by nationality I'm member of a growing populace we enforce our popularity I feel sorry for the earth's population 'cuz so few live in the U.S.A. At least the foreigners can copy our morality they can visit but they cannot stay Only precious few can garner the prosperity it makes us walk with renewed confidence He's the farmers barren fields the force the army wields The expression in the faces of the starving millions The power of the man he's the fuel that drives the clan He's the motive and conscience of the murderer He's the preacher on t.v. the false sincerity The form letter that's written by the big computers He's the nuclear bombs and the kids with no moms

#12 GreeneStreet

GreeneStreet

    Poker Forum Regular

  • Members
  • 102 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Trenton

Posted 02 March 2009 - 02:22 PM

QUOTE (All_In @ Monday, March 2nd, 2009, 4:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
This may be wrong, but I would think limping is a better option since you will likely get the suited connectors joining in. You can bust them with your nut flush vs their small flush. Does this happen so rarely that it is not a relevant strategy?


Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe its 11% to hit your flush draw with AXs and less than 1% to hit your flush on the flop.

I really don't see a point in limping with AXs. Either get in the hand and raise it, or get out imo.
Better late than never.

#13 mtdesmoines

mtdesmoines

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 9,939 posts

Posted 02 March 2009 - 02:25 PM

QUOTE (gooch @ Monday, March 2nd, 2009, 2:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
you have to be able to lay down ace flops to resistance when you don't hit your kicker, if you can't, then don't do it imo


If this is our standard, we should fold AQ> PF
Somewhere Jimmy Carter is smiling because he knows that he is no longer the worst President of the modern era

#14 TAGteam

TAGteam

    Poker Forum Regular

  • Members
  • 115 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:chillin
  • Favorite Poker Game:Omaha

Posted 02 March 2009 - 02:38 PM

QUOTE (mtdesmoines @ Monday, March 2nd, 2009, 5:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If this is our standard, we should fold AQ> PF


yah...makes no sense.

#15 LJB723

LJB723

    What do you see?

  • Members
  • 1,753 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dundee, Scotland
  • Interests:Aside from poker - hockey (ice and field), football (soccer), rugby, cricket, sport in general really
  • Favorite Poker Game:NLHE, PLO, Badugi

Posted 03 March 2009 - 07:38 AM

QUOTE (TAGteam @ Monday, March 2nd, 2009, 10:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
yah...makes no sense.


I think mt is saying we shouldn't play any A worse than AQ if we are going to be remotely unhappy when we hit our A (but don't make As up)
The whores and politicians will look up and shout "save us!"

And I will whisper "no"

- Rorschach

#16 SpatsJ

SpatsJ

    Poker Forum Regular

  • Members
  • 124 posts

Posted 03 March 2009 - 11:09 AM

i still like playing AJ and AT especially when their suited and am reasonably happy with an A on the flop. could be stupid?

#17 LJB723

LJB723

    What do you see?

  • Members
  • 1,753 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dundee, Scotland
  • Interests:Aside from poker - hockey (ice and field), football (soccer), rugby, cricket, sport in general really
  • Favorite Poker Game:NLHE, PLO, Badugi

Posted 03 March 2009 - 11:34 AM

QUOTE (SpatsJ @ Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009, 7:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
i still like playing AJ and AT especially when their suited and am reasonably happy with an A on the flop. could be stupid?


No I think thats fine. Depending on position, table dynamics, opponents etc.

I think having a hard and fast rule of folding A with <K is -EV. I think that's what mt was getting at.
The whores and politicians will look up and shout "save us!"

And I will whisper "no"

- Rorschach

#18 SpatsJ

SpatsJ

    Poker Forum Regular

  • Members
  • 124 posts

Posted 03 March 2009 - 11:39 AM

right. makes sense. thanks.

#19 All_In

All_In

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,198 posts
  • Location:ON
  • Interests:Poker, Golf, Poker, Guitar, Poker, etc...

Posted 03 March 2009 - 01:58 PM

QUOTE (LJB723 @ Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009, 12:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
No I think thats fine. Depending on position, table dynamics, opponents etc.

I think having a hard and fast rule of folding A with <K is -EV. I think that's what mt was getting at.

but to raise A-Xs in EP, what do you think about that (generally)?
I don't need to be a global citizen because I'm blessed by nationality I'm member of a growing populace we enforce our popularity I feel sorry for the earth's population 'cuz so few live in the U.S.A. At least the foreigners can copy our morality they can visit but they cannot stay Only precious few can garner the prosperity it makes us walk with renewed confidence He's the farmers barren fields the force the army wields The expression in the faces of the starving millions The power of the man he's the fuel that drives the clan He's the motive and conscience of the murderer He's the preacher on t.v. the false sincerity The form letter that's written by the big computers He's the nuclear bombs and the kids with no moms

#20 LJB723

LJB723

    What do you see?

  • Members
  • 1,753 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dundee, Scotland
  • Interests:Aside from poker - hockey (ice and field), football (soccer), rugby, cricket, sport in general really
  • Favorite Poker Game:NLHE, PLO, Badugi

Posted 03 March 2009 - 02:03 PM

QUOTE (All_In @ Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009, 9:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
but to raise A-Xs in EP, what do you think about that (generally)?


6-max. I'll raise almost any suited A. And any A over A7, folding the rest.

FR. I think AT is my minimum for raising, I include suited AXs in that range. Mostly because I'm much comfier 6m than fr.
The whores and politicians will look up and shout "save us!"

And I will whisper "no"

- Rorschach




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users