I have recently bought The Theory of Poker by David Skalansky and Harrington on NL Holdem. After reading many reviews i figured these were the best books. I was wondering if anyone has any suggestions on which book to read first. thx for any help
0
which to read first? skalansky or harrington
Started by ChipLeader7, May 17 2005 05:25 PM
7 replies to this topic
#1
ChipLeader7
-
- Members
- 225 posts
Poker Forum Regular
- Location:New York
Posted 17 May 2005 - 05:25 PM
#2
UNCpoker
-
- Members
- 268 posts
Poker Forum Nut
- Location:Spokane Valley, WA
Posted 18 May 2005 - 07:03 AM
HOH
#3
ChipLeader7
-
- Members
- 225 posts
Poker Forum Regular
- Location:New York
Posted 18 May 2005 - 12:54 PM
thx anyone else?
#4
dakielbasa
-
- Members
- 50 posts
Poker Forum Newbie
Posted 21 May 2005 - 07:10 AM
HOH is for tournaments
#5
theStork
-
- Members
- 107 posts
Poker Forum Regular
Posted 26 May 2005 - 04:36 AM
i think HOH is a much better book. it has improved my cash game and my tournament game considerable. read them both.
"...don't let huge gaps in your knowledge stop you from forming strong opinions." -extempore
#6
Rocketwadster
-
- Members
- 3,816 posts
Poker Forum Veteran
- Location:Cambridge, Ontario
- Interests:Gambling, Sports
Posted 26 May 2005 - 04:50 AM
Harrington's book is the best there is, the best there was, and the best there ever will be :wink:
#7
allinbluff35
-
- Members
- 9,505 posts
Inevitably Running Bad
- Location:The Land Of Busto.
Posted 26 May 2005 - 04:18 PM
Rocketwadster said:
Harrington's book is the best there is, the best there was, and the best there ever will be :wink:
#8
DCWildcat
-
- Members
- 1,691 posts
Poker Forum Veteran
- Location:Kentucky
Posted 29 May 2005 - 10:48 PM
Most limit players would say TOP first. Including me. 8)
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
