At first, I was ready to believe the poker sites juiced the rake by dealing hands that promote more wagering, and ready to believe they might have some "bots" playing as prop players. If they used bots, it would be a small leap to assume they could also deal the bots slightly better hands over time, thereby making more profits than just the rake. The prospect of getting caught using bots would be the best argument against using them. Many sites do actually pay prop players an hourly rate to fill out games. If they could use bots, why pay anyone? The argument that best supports their being straight-up is this: if word ever got out that they were not legit, their cash flow would suffer and possibly die all together. Their life blood is the player's belief that the games are fair. It is a 2 billion dollar a year business and if they risked one disgruntled employee or programmer going public with the fact that they cheat, even a little, they would kill the golden goose.I have had numerous odd situations on-line that call the fairness of the game into question, but the more I play live games, the more I see that all those circumstances that seem suspicious when run by a machine also occur in live games. Richard Sparks interviews several key people from on-line sites regarding this issue in his book "Diary of a Mad Poker Player". He concludes they are on the level. I too will assume they are legit till someone proves otherwise.This is an article on bots, but it is concerned with players using bots. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6002298I doubt members of a site could ever use bots because you don't get enough data at your system. I have not found any good analysis of the prospects of the sites themselves using bots. That is the only real threat.Koroshiya
do on-line rooms use bots?
Started by Koroshiya, May 17 2005 11:12 AM
8 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 17 May 2005 - 11:12 AM
In war you can only be killed once, but in poker many times. - Winston Churchill (slightly modified )
#2
Posted 17 May 2005 - 01:15 PM
buy a patternmapper at www.butitwassooted.com and then pick up a tinfoil hat at www.chromeonmydome.com
#3
Posted 19 May 2005 - 09:23 AM
allinbluff35 said:
buy a patternmapper at www.butitwassooted.com and then pick up a tinfoil hat at www.chromeonmydome.com
#4
Posted 19 May 2005 - 11:14 AM
Koroshiya said:
allinbluff35 said:
buy a patternmapper at www.butitwassooted.com and then pick up a tinfoil hat at www.chromeonmydome.com
#5
Posted 19 May 2005 - 03:04 PM
reading about them it looks like it would be easy to get one. im sure there is a lot of people out there that are doing it, i think its a bunch of crap and the sights need to punish those people who do it. it should be illegal. but im not sure if its actually out lawed, anyone know?
#6
Posted 20 May 2005 - 05:45 AM
Wouldn't they just be big fish anyay with a big target on them? If anything they'd play just the top hands and very sloppy at that... I don't think anyone would want to risk real money and rely on a bot to generate any sort of profit for them in the long run.
#7
Posted 20 May 2005 - 09:24 AM
allinbluff35 said:
actually I don't, I just really don't care about reading someones take on whether or not online card rooms use bots or not. ..
#8
Posted 20 May 2005 - 09:30 AM
eric star said:
reading about them it looks like it would be easy to get one. im sure there is a lot of people out there that are doing it, i think its a bunch of crap and the sights need to punish those people who do it. it should be illegal. but im not sure if its actually out lawed, anyone know?
#9
Posted 21 May 2005 - 01:32 PM
Quote
The argument that best supports their being straight-up is this: if word ever got out that they were not legit, their cash flow would suffer and possibly die all together. Their life blood is the player's belief that the games are fair. It is a 2 billion dollar a year business and if they risked one disgruntled employee or programmer going public with the fact that they cheat, even a little, they would kill the golden goose.
Mike McDermott: Listen, here's the thing. If you can't spot the sucker in the first half hour at the table, then you ARE the sucker.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









