When playing NL games, (tournaments, or S n G's mostly)Some times when i get low - mid pocket pairs, or big drawing hands like A,K. i will either raise, or just smooth call dependng on my position, and chip count in relation to the other players.I have a read a few books, nothing really on this topic.. anyone agree with me, or is there a better way to play these "profitable" hands??
need some help/thoughts
Started by Royal_Tour, May 16 2005 07:26 AM
7 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 16 May 2005 - 07:26 AM
#2
Posted 16 May 2005 - 07:37 AM
Royal_Tour said:
When playing NL games, (tournaments, or S n G's mostly)Some times when i get low - mid pocket pairs, or big drawing hands like A,K. i will either raise, or just smooth call dependng on my position, and chip count in relation to the other players.I have a read a few books, nothing really on this topic.. anyone agree with me, or is there a better way to play these "profitable" hands??
#3
Posted 16 May 2005 - 07:54 AM
BeanGW said:
Royal_Tour said:
When playing NL games, (tournaments, or S n G's mostly)Some times when i get low - mid pocket pairs, or big drawing hands like A,K. i will either raise, or just smooth call dependng on my position, and chip count in relation to the other players.I have a read a few books, nothing really on this topic.. anyone agree with me, or is there a better way to play these "profitable" hands??
#4
Posted 16 May 2005 - 07:58 AM
well not always raise with them.If you desperately need the chips, I mean you need to do more than double up to make any head way. I see times to slow play them and attempt to get more action. But you always have to realize the risk in doing this. You are taking the chance of giving up the blinds or chance to double up, to get more than the double up.If you do slow play them, you cant complain about getting beat by an inferior hand.
#5
Posted 16 May 2005 - 08:01 AM
Kevin Garceau said:
well not always raise with them.If you desperately need the chips, I mean you need to do more than double up to make any head way. I see times to slow play them and attempt to get more action. But you always have to realize the risk in doing this. You are taking the chance of giving up the blinds or chance to double up, to get more than the double up.If you do slow play them, you cant complain about getting beat by an inferior hand.
#6
Posted 16 May 2005 - 08:14 AM
The reason I always raise with A-K is the idea of the pot equity edge, as Sklansky discusses a little in SSHE. When all the cards are said and done for a hand, A-K is more likely than a whole lot of others to take down a pot and therefore it's a good idea to pump up the pot early with this hand.For example. If there are 4 players, and you have a random hand, you would expect to win a pot 25% of the time (less than 25% if it's 7-2 off, more than 25% if it's A-A, but, figuring your hand is random ya go with the 25%). Now, when your hand is known to be A-K, that percentage is increased to at least 30% (approx. I'm not sure of the specifics, but you get the idea).This correllates to you having a claim to a greater percentage of the pot... and, since more of it is yours, you want to get more money in the pot preflop so that you are getting more of other peoples money in there preflop as well.There are plenty of other reasons to raise preflop... you take control of the betting if you are in late position, you force others to fold or call two cold if you're in early... yada yada yada.Of course there are always exceptions to every rule, but, technically, I think this is the reason why you should always raise preflop with A-K.
#7
Posted 16 May 2005 - 08:33 AM
BeanGW said:
The reason I always raise with A-K is the idea of the pot equity edge, as Sklansky discusses a little in SSHE. When all the cards are said and done for a hand, A-K is more likely than a whole lot of others to take down a pot and therefore it's a good idea to pump up the pot early with this hand.For example. If there are 4 players, and you have a random hand, you would expect to win a pot 25% of the time (less than 25% if it's 7-2 off, more than 25% if it's A-A, but, figuring your hand is random ya go with the 25%). Now, when your hand is known to be A-K, that percentage is increased to at least 30% (approx. I'm not sure of the specifics, but you get the idea).This correllates to you having a claim to a greater percentage of the pot... and, since more of it is yours, you want to get more money in the pot preflop so that you are getting more of other peoples money in there preflop as well.There are plenty of other reasons to raise preflop... you take control of the betting if you are in late position, you force others to fold or call two cold if you're in early... yada yada yada.Of course there are always exceptions to every rule, but, technically, I think this is the reason why you should always raise preflop with A-K.
#8
Posted 16 May 2005 - 08:37 AM
To the first sign of trouble is nessisarily the right thing to do. Certainly, to certain kinds of action muck it, but it has to be alot of it, from rocky players, 'cause theres just two hands AK is killed by, and so many that it kills, and the two hands that kill it (AA KK) are very unlikely. I remember one tourniment that I mucked AK twice preflop, and I was right both times, I was against AA once and KK once. but most of the time I am willing to raise and re raise with it.... from early position at certain times in a tourniment, I will limp from upfront with AK, in order to trap other aces in there, as an early positon raise can scare out AJ. Ax or Kx is the hand you want to play against most with AK, and raising early can often scare them out. But if the blinds are worth stealing in relation to my chip stack, then limping goes out the window.

"We are only wise in knowing that we know nothing"
-Socrates
"Dust. Wind. Dude."
-Ted Theodore Logan
SN: BigDMcGee on Stars and UB. I do NOT have a full tilt account because those Richers won't give me rakeback.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









