too aggressive?

[cursive34 0]

Party Poker 0.5/1 Hold'em (10 handed) converterPreflop: Hero is UTG+2 with 4:diamond:, 4:club:. 2 folds, SB completes, BB checks.Flop: (5 SB) 3:diamond:, 4:spade:, Q:spade: (5 players)SB checks, BB checks, Hero bets, MP1 calls, MP2 calls, SB calls.Turn: (8.50 BB) 2:heart: (4 players)SB checks, Hero bets, MP1 calls, MP2 calls.River: (17.50 BB) 8:heart: (3 players)Hero bets, MP1 calls.Final Pot: 23.50 BBshould i have just check/called the raise on the turn and check/call the river? the player was a loose player who played over 90% of the hands and called down the the river almost every time.

[wrto4556 0]

Everything up to the river was good. I'd just call him when he raises the umpteenth time.

[waldo 0]

i like it, i dont even mind the river, the only hand you could be worried about is QQ, the amount of time that you have the best hand is much more then the times he will have QQhe would have capped the turn or river with QQ anyway, youre good

[RISEorFall 0]

or 5-6 or A-5 for a straight. A-5 more likely as people are attracted to Aces. EDIT: 5-6 looks more likely after I look at the flop action closer. Aggressively playing OESD. He could just as easily have 2 pair tho.

[waldo 0]

oh yea, i missed the straight possiblities, i still think he would have capped with that type of hand, but i now agree that slowing down on the river is probably better

[KDawgCometh 2]

a read would help imensely here

[rwood 0]

i like the hand beign played this aggressively with this amount of people in the pot, you cant put him on QQ really because no one raised preflop...not many hands worry you on this board with the aggression he showed on the flop. on the flop you could put him on tpgk or even a lower set... 3's. he either grossly overplayed AQ or was betting a set of 3's, he also may have limped with a big pp, which makes him dumb...