tilt me
Full Tilt Poker Game #8956303063: $10 + $0.50 Heads Up Sit & Go (68557099), Table 1 - 100/200 - Limit Hold'em - 17:37:23 ET - 2008/11/13
Seat 1: applejuice16 (2,020)
Seat 2: kurgan1 (980)
kurgan1 posts the small blind of 50
applejuice16 posts the big blind of 100
The button is in seat #2
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to applejuice16 [As Jc]
kurgan1 raises to 200
applejuice16 raises to 300
kurgan1 calls 100
*** FLOP *** [4h 6c 2d]
applejuice16 bets 100
kurgan1 calls 100
*** TURN *** [4h 6c 2d] [Qd]
applejuice16 bets 200
kurgan1 calls 200
*** RIVER *** [4h 6c 2d Qd] [6d]
applejuice16 bets 200
kurgan1 raises to 380, and is all in
applejuice16 calls 180
*** SHOW DOWN ***
kurgan1 shows [Td 8d] a flush, Queen high
applejuice16 mucks
kurgan1 wins the pot (1,960) with a flush, Queen high
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 1,960 | Rake 0
Board: [4h 6c 2d Qd 6d]
Seat 1: applejuice16 (big blind) mucked [As Jc] - a pair of Sixes
Seat 2: kurgan1 (small blind) showed [Td 8d] and won (1,960) with a flush, Queen high
Poo
Started by wsox8, Nov 13 2008 02:40 PM
7 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 13 November 2008 - 02:40 PM
#2
Posted 13 November 2008 - 08:14 PM
why is this a bad beat? All u had was ace high. i know he was on a draw but i keep wondering why ur betting after the flop and then calling an all-in with only Ace high.
This is my first post so im probably wrong.
This is my first post so im probably wrong.
#3
Posted 13 November 2008 - 08:18 PM
QUOTE (kola99 @ Thursday, November 13th, 2008, 9:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
why is this a bad beat? All u had was ace high. i know he was on a draw but i keep wondering why ur betting after the flop and then calling an all-in with only Ace high.
This is my first post so im probably wrong.
This is my first post so im probably wrong.
Upon further review i have decided: Im right. And i stand by that decision. This is not a bad beat but a badly played pot.
#4
Posted 13 November 2008 - 09:21 PM
QUOTE (kola99 @ Thursday, November 13th, 2008, 10:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Upon further review i have decided: Im right. And i stand by that decision. This is not a bad beat but a badly played pot.
After further review: I disagree with you. You are wrong and will always be wrong.
#5
Posted 14 November 2008 - 12:05 AM
this is not a bad beat....
you both played the hand poorly... although given his short stack he was pretty much committed from the flop call..
you both played the hand poorly... although given his short stack he was pretty much committed from the flop call..
#6
Posted 14 November 2008 - 07:09 AM
I was about to add how bad this hand was played, until I realized this was a Limit game. I may have given up after the flop, but its still a bad river card for you as you were ahead all the way.
#7
Posted 14 November 2008 - 10:33 PM
Ehhh didnt play it that bad if at all you dont have to bet the river but other than that its fine. Betting the river doesnt accomplish anything here, he might even check behind some hands that have u beat but are def calling ur bet.
#8
Posted 19 November 2008 - 01:13 PM
QUOTE (SGFULTON83 @ Friday, November 14th, 2008, 10:09 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I was about to add how bad this hand was played, until I realized this was a Limit game. I may have given up after the flop, but its still a bad river card for you as you were ahead all the way.
This^^^^^. Other than that, I think play was fine, except for river.
QUOTE (no not baxter @ Monday, February 9th, 2009, 11:03 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
ya srsly why not just make a 2 hour dinner break so ppl can go to outback and get a fkn bloomin onion
For rakeback at:
FTP, BoDog, UB, Absolute, Cake
2008 Neg-O TOC NL Champion
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









