Britain Faces Sperm Shortage
#1
Posted 12 November 2008 - 10:15 PM
Britain faces sperm shortage, calls for donors
Number of donors dropped after law granting anonymity was reversed
The Associated Press
updated 7:55 p.m. ET, Wed., Nov. 12, 2008
LONDON - Britain is facing a sperm donor shortage after reversing confidentiality laws and limiting the number of women who can use sperm from one donor, fertility experts warned Wednesday.
Britain in 2005 changed the law protecting anonymous sperm donors and allowed children to learn the identity of donor fathers — one reason, fertility experts say, there are fewer donors now.
“The only countries that seem to have enough sperm are those that pay — like the U.S. and Spain — or the countries that retain anonymity,” said Allan Pacey, a member of the British Fertility Society that warned of the shortage in the British Medical Journal.
“In the countries that have removed anonymity ... there seems to be a problem,” he said.
In 1991, Britain logged 503 sperm donors, according to figures from the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. In 2000, there were 325, and in 2006 — the year after the law was changed — the number dropped to 307.
Experts say 500 donors a year are needed to cope with the number of couples needing donor insemination in Britain.
Dutch authorities have also put out calls to encourage sperm donors after scrapping anonymity for donors in 2004.
“There is a shortage of sperm donors. This is because of the new laws that make the anonymous donation of sperm impossible,” the University of Amsterdam’s Fertility Clinic of the Academic Medical Center said on its Web site.
Usage limits could also affect availability.
In Britain, only 10 babies can result from one donor — a limit some have called arbitrary. The Dutch allow one donor to supply sperm to 25 women.
The United States does not cap sperm donations at all, according to Eleanor Nicoll, spokeswoman for the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. However, the group suggests that a single donor be limited to no more than 25 births in a population of 800,000 to avoid having siblings from the same sperm donor having children together.
In France, sperm donation is anonymous and the government covers donors’ expenses but the country still faces a sperm shortage. France registered 248 sperm donors in 2006, according to the country’s Agency of Biomedicine — a level an official there said was not enough to supply demand.
Donors in U.S. can remain anonymous
Unlike Britain, U.S. donors have the option of remaining anonymous, said Dr. Robert Visscher, former executive director of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine.
“I don’t think we are having a problem with adequate numbers of donors at this time, primarily because we don’t have that regulation,” he said.
Mark Jackson, 40, decided to donate in 2005, even after Britain’s government amended the donor law.
“To worry that someone might come and see you, that something might happen? That’s a long way in the future,” said Jackson. “I thought maybe I (could) do something to make a difference.”
Olivia Montuschi, co-founder of the Donor Conception Network, said changing the confidentiality law was important for the donors’ children but shouldn’t prevent men from being willing to help.
“What is needed is someone who has the maturity to understand the importance of what they’re doing for the future, and the impact that might have on anyone who’s conceived,” said Montuschi, whose children were conceived using donor sperm. “We are not talking about a fatherhood role.”
Although sperm donations from other countries are allowed in Britain, clinics cannot pay donors and donations from abroad are not enough to cope with the shortage, said Pacey, who runs a fertility clinic in Sheffield, 165 kilometers (265 miles) from London.
“Once upon a time ... we had hundreds and hundreds of people phoning up every year,” he said. “Now, 20 a year? Not in any great numbers.”
My blog: http://southernbuddhist.blogspot.com/
My NPR commentary: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=7480119
#2
Posted 12 November 2008 - 10:17 PM
#3
Posted 12 November 2008 - 10:19 PM
but im sterile...sorry
I'm kind of a big deal.
#4
Posted 12 November 2008 - 10:19 PM
#5
Posted 12 November 2008 - 10:19 PM
but im sterile...sorry
^^
#6
Posted 12 November 2008 - 10:27 PM
#7
Posted 12 November 2008 - 10:30 PM
I'm kind of a big deal.
#9
Posted 12 November 2008 - 10:41 PM
Well if you cramp up you may have to use both hands at some point.
#10
Posted 12 November 2008 - 10:41 PM
lol
Me neither! Vasectomy ftw/ftl.
#11
Posted 12 November 2008 - 10:52 PM
ah.
hows that workin out for you?
I'm kind of a big deal.
#12
Posted 12 November 2008 - 10:55 PM
I'd rather have Harry, his nazi uniform turns me on. What a rebel he is!
#13
Posted 12 November 2008 - 10:57 PM
harry pothead?
speaking of england...anyong going to see the new bond the wkend?
I'm kind of a big deal.
#14
Posted 13 November 2008 - 02:04 AM
All excellent, although I'm confused.. Are we lending Britain a "helping hand"? And if so, wouldn't they need to loan us one to "help" them?
#15
Posted 13 November 2008 - 02:36 AM
hows that workin out for you?
Well, no more kids. That's good!
#16
Posted 13 November 2008 - 04:20 AM
#17
Posted 13 November 2008 - 04:45 AM
You shut your mouth!
#18
Posted 13 November 2008 - 06:24 AM
Well, if it was all placed in one big vat, the anonymity issue that is causing this shortage would be solved. Fertile women could just hop in for a quick swim and go home with a little baby growing in them.



#19
Posted 13 November 2008 - 08:34 AM
[15:06] <Jan99> go J E T S
#20
Posted 13 November 2008 - 08:38 AM
But mine have made it through birth control and my daughter was conceived on the first try.
See this actually isn't a brag because getting my daughter on the first try means that I was not able to try multiple times which is the fun part of making a baby, the rest is just 10 months of misery.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











