Jump to content

Recommended Posts

PokerStars Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (6 handed) - Poker-Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.comPreflop: Hero is BB with A :ts, A :D3 folds, Button raises, SB calls, Hero 3-bets, Button caps, SB calls, Hero callsFlop: (12 SB) J :4h, 5 :club:, K :D(3 players)SB bets, Hero calls, Button raises, SB 3-bets, Hero calls, Button caps, SB calls, Hero callsTurn: (12 BB) 3 :5c(3 players)SB bets, Hero calls, Button raises, SB 3-bets, What do I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Raise that first bet on the flop, too.
Agreed. Your opponents would have to be extremely maniacal to continue here. I have been in games like this ( live, mostly) that I would jam on the turn, but you have to have a specific reason to stay in this hand. All the action is telling you that one pair is beat. and for the love of Christ, raise on the flop. The pot's too big not to try and raise people out.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad to hear that I correctly folded in what eventually became a $24 pot. Both of these maniacs made my buddy list (had no read on them before the hand in question).PokerStars Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (6 handed) - Poker-Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com568477.pngPreflop: Hero is BB with A :4h, A :D3 folds, Button raises, SB calls, Hero 3-bets, Button caps, SB calls, Hero callsFlop: (12 SB) J :3h, 5 :club:, K :5c(3 players)SB bets, Hero calls, Button raises, SB 3-bets, Hero calls, Button caps, SB calls, Hero callsTurn: (12 BB) 3 :D(3 players)SB bets, Hero calls, Button raises, SB 3-bets, Hero folds, Button callsRiver: (19 BB) K :ts(2 players)SB bets, Button raises, SB 3-bets, Button callsTotal pot: $25 (25 BB) | Rake: $0.50Results: Button had Q :D, J :D (two pair, Kings and Jacks).SB had A :qh, 9 :qh (one pair, Kings).Outcome: Button won $24.50

Link to post
Share on other sites
umm.... not that it's super likely to happen at .5/1, but that reeks of collusion.
I think at .5/1 collusion is unlikely, but if you seem them together again, report them. The river action doesn't really seem consistent with collusion. Becareful in assuming that they both were maniacs, btw. What could have been the case is one is a maniac, and the other is reacting to the maniacal behavior, trying to get the pot heads up with the maniac. I know I've done "crazy" raises, that I'm sure my opponents thought were utterly insane, that I did in order to isolate the pot with a maniac.Another thing.. the way you played your hand on the flop, made it okay for them to take it away from you. You played your hand in such a passive way, that it makes you look like you have an under pair or some sort of A high gut shot or something. If you had played your hand strong on the flop, there's a chance the turn action would not have gone the way it did, and you wouldn't have been forced out of the pot. In short, don't play passively.
Link to post
Share on other sites
umm.... not that it's super likely to happen at .5/1, but that reeks of collusion.
Mac is right. Why do they put 3 bets in on the river if they're colluding?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I think people just suck. I saw a ton of this sort of stuff when I played at those levels. It makes me want to drop down and make easy monies.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Mac is right. Why do they put 3 bets in on the river if they're colluding?
Yeah, but is mac right about the flop play? What does everyone else think, if the OP takes control of the hand on the flop, maybe they don't go nutso trying to push him out.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, but is mac right about the flop play? What does everyone else think, if the OP takes control of the hand on the flop, maybe they don't go nutso trying to push him out.
Oh, definitely. I am shoveling money into the pot on this flop and it plays a lot more straightforward when you do it that way.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I absolutely agree that if I raise instead of call on the flop one of them probably goes away and I win the pot.

umm.... not that it's super likely to happen at .5/1, but that reeks of collusion.
Believe me, that was my first thought as well as I watched the $24 pot being shipped across the table. I watched them the rest of the time and didn't see anything that made me think they were colluding. One of them ended down $86 in like an HOUR and the other was down around $9 sitting over and hour and a half I think.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...