DonkSlayer 1 Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 Assume no reads. Assume we have opened for at least 4x the bb with AA from EP/MP and was flat-called by an opponent skilled between unk and good. We lead or c/r a raggy board.We are reraised allin. How many bb's are we willing to risk? Discuss. Link to post Share on other sites
PrtyPSux 0 Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 Assume no reads. Assume we have opened for at least 4x the bb with AA from EP/MP and was flat-called by an opponent skilled between unk and good. We lead or c/r a raggy board.We are reraised allin. How many bb's are we willing to risk? Discuss.that's a bit of a broad question no?I would say 115 bb's... Link to post Share on other sites
trystero 0 Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 I'd cap it at 150 but it's arbitrary I knowDefinitely the 100 I sat down with. Link to post Share on other sites
mtdesmoines 2 Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 Assume no reads. Assume we have opened for at least 4x the bb with AA from EP/MP and was flat-called by an opponent skilled between unk and good. We lead or c/r a raggy board.We are reraised allin. How many bb's are we willing to risk? Discuss.around a buy in or 100 BBs whatever. we need reads to stack off with one pair. Link to post Share on other sites
NoBBiR 0 Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 I just don't fold aces for 100bbs on pretty much every unpaired flop without a read.101bb and I'll start to think about it. Link to post Share on other sites
krup24 0 Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 100-120 Link to post Share on other sites
CobaltBlue 662 Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 Assume no reads. Assume we have opened for at least 4x the bb with AA from EP/MP and was flat-called by an opponent skilled between unk and good. We lead or c/r a raggy board.We are reraised allin. How many bb's are we willing to risk? Discuss.Read "Professional No Limit Hold 'Em".Summarizing:If opponent is loose, we can typically stack off when the relative stack is ~94bb to start.If opponent is average, we can usually stack off when the relative stack is ~58bb to start.If opponent is tight, we can stack off when the relative stack is ~22bb to start.So a little under 100 should be your upper range most of the time, but it can get adjusted upwards in some cases. Link to post Share on other sites
SGFULTON83 0 Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 Assuming no reads <100 BB's I'm there and over that gets me nervous but I still think I go with it. Link to post Share on other sites
NoBBiR 0 Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 Read "Professional No Limit Hold 'Em".Summarizing:If opponent is loose, we can typically stack off when the relative stack is ~94bb to start.If opponent is average, we can usually stack off when the relative stack is ~58bb to start.If opponent is tight, we can stack off when the relative stack is ~22bb to start.So a little under 100 should be your upper range most of the time, but it can get adjusted upwards in some cases.Does he make this formulaic in some way, or is it just his opinion? Link to post Share on other sites
CobaltBlue 662 Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 Does he make this formulaic in some way, or is it just his opinion?It's related to Stack-Pot-Ratios (SPR), which is the size of the smallest stack in relation to the pot after all of the pre-flop betting is complete. The premise is that a tight opponent is only likely to put in a certain amount of action when you've got him beat with an overpair, whereas a loose opponent will put in more. Link to post Share on other sites
trystero 0 Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 Those numbers seem low. We're only supposed to be in 100 bbs with AA to the loosest of opponents ? Is the author already assuming a dry board ? Link to post Share on other sites
mtdesmoines 2 Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 Those numbers seem low. We're only supposed to be in 100 bbs with AA to the loosest of opponents ? Is the author already assuming a dry board ?I think the dry boards are more dangerous unless we've closed action by flat-calling a single villain's raise pre. Link to post Share on other sites
DonkSlayer 1 Posted October 7, 2008 Author Share Posted October 7, 2008 I think the dry boards are more dangerous unless we've closed action by flat-calling a single villain's raise pre.I concur. And in the example, I was trying to relate the board is indeed very dry. Link to post Share on other sites
CobaltBlue 662 Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 Those numbers seem low. We're only supposed to be in 100 bbs with AA to the loosest of opponents ? Is the author already assuming a dry board ?Well, with AA, it may get adjusted up slightly. That's kind of the SPR's (10, 6, 2) for "big overpairs". For TPTK hands, you need slightly lower numbers. The point is essentially that if there's $9 in the pot pre-flop (assuming a .50/1 game) and you and your opponent have roughly $117 left going into the flop, you're in a somewhat tough spot. You're probably not going to be able to get all of the money in the pot when you're significantly ahead and you risk giving too much action when you're behind. Your opponent can really make your life a pain on a lot of boards, especially if he's in position. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now