chgocubs99 0 Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 True statement? Link to post Share on other sites
king_tanner 84 Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 I searched calling station in google images and this came up: Link to post Share on other sites
rcgs59 15 Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 I searched calling station in google images and this came up:that's more like you after you drinking tanner lol Link to post Share on other sites
Gallo 1 Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 True statement?If that's true then I've been ahead of the learning curve for years, fyi. Link to post Share on other sites
silkyjonson 1 Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 you mean something along these lines?Make sure to read the comments on the end Link to post Share on other sites
bull62 0 Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 I think more and more people have gotten on the "I'll just call and outplay them post flop" bandwagon even though they have no chance in hell of outplaying anybody. Link to post Share on other sites
Jordan 1 Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 no! Link to post Share on other sites
ah2388 0 Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 I think more and more people have gotten on the "I'll just call and outplay them post flop" bandwagon even though they have no chance in hell of outplaying anybody.speak for yourselfone time king1305 was playing me HU in a super deepstacked sng...He raised on the button with Ace Ace, I called out of the bb with J9ss.. The Floop came JJ9. I attempted a tarp and king1305 soul read me and checked behind. The turn came an offsuit deuce and I led for the pot. King1305 Flatcalled and the river brought the 4th J. I put king1305 on a hand like xx-xx and figured hed valuebet/bluff the river into my quads...I checked and he checked behind with AAIf he didnt outplay me that hand then idk what outplaying someone is...That being said, if sean can do it...anyone can Link to post Share on other sites
whatgreatis 0 Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 I searched calling station in google images and this came up:How fitting. Link to post Share on other sites
jmbreslin 0 Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 you mean something along these lines?Make sure to read the comments on the endTerrible article. Not only does he fail to appreciate the nuanced distinction between selectively aggressive and stupidly aggressive, but he seems to base his whole argument on the fact that the top 8 chipstacks of the September 9 describe their ME play as tight and cautious. But note the "about the author" at the end:About JACK WELCHRetired after a decades-long writing career. Erstwhile Director of Public Relations for NIKE. Co-founder of Running magazine. Prize-winning poet. Senior Editor, Track & Field News. Ran many marathons. Undefeated racer of elephants (3-0 lifetime.) Czechoslovakian Linguist USAF/NSA. Married. 2 step-children, 3 grandsons.Notice how the word "poker" doesn't appear anywhere? Apparently he could write a book about elephant racing, though. Link to post Share on other sites
antistuff 0 Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 Terrible article. Not only does he fail to appreciate the nuanced distinction between selectively aggressive and stupidly aggressive, but he seems to base his whole argument on the fact that the top 8 chipstacks of the September 9 describe their ME play as tight and cautious. But note the "about the author" at the end:About JACK WELCHRetired after a decades-long writing career. Erstwhile Director of Public Relations for NIKE. Co-founder of Running magazine. Prize-winning poet. Senior Editor, Track & Field News. Ran many marathons. Undefeated racer of elephants (3-0 lifetime.) Czechoslovakian Linguist USAF/NSA. Married. 2 step-children, 3 grandsons.Notice how the word "poker" doesn't appear anywhere? Apparently he could write a book about elephant racing, though.i agree with you completely except that i think its a wonderful article. this guy should have his own column in card player. Link to post Share on other sites
Mercury69 3 Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 What about "luck"? There is a huge card-catching luck factor here that isn't really quantifiable. Is there skill in avoiding conflict? Yes, to a certain extent. But you can never, ever control the cards that come when a guy calls a 3x BB raise and then a 2/3 pot c-bet and hits his 2 outer on the turn. That is luck, fate, variance, whatever you want to call it, it's unavoidable.By the way, UTG min-raise is the "new" all-in. Link to post Share on other sites
outsider13 0 Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 By the way, UTG min-raise is the "new" all-in.That and the check min-raise. Link to post Share on other sites
PMJackson21 0 Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 That and the check min-raise.Whoever started this trend is a bad person. Link to post Share on other sites
looshle 6 Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 Whoever started this trend is a bad person.While you are here Pat, why dont you tell us why you went off the charts and tell us why folding is in? Link to post Share on other sites
PMJackson21 0 Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 While you are here Pat, why dont you tell us why you went off the charts and tell us why folding is in?Folding is in because then I get to look at my Manny avatar instead of my cards.As for why I 'went off the charts', I blame you. Ever since you 4 bet me all in with like 7 high in that Venetian tournament a few years back, I've never been the same. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now