Possible Large Betting Opportunity
#1
Posted 12 September 2008 - 10:02 PM
On Matchbook the odds for Man City to win is +340 and the odds for Chelsea to win is -109. Draw is +258. What's going on here? Should I just unload my entire roll on Chelsea right now? I just started using Matchbook, and I'm not sure what's going on here.
I know nothing about futbol, so there's no way for me to know who should win.
Edit: Am I retarded, because in the Liverpool-Man Utd match, Liverpool is +189 and Man U is +188. Do I just not understand soccer betting?
#2
Posted 13 September 2008 - 02:32 AM
I assume the -109 on Chelsea means they are massive favourites and the 188 to 189 for Man U/Liverpool means the linemakers thinks its too close to call?
IMO (and James' too probably) Man U will beat Liverpool, they are essentially a 2-man team in Gerrard and Torres and they have both just been passed fit for this game. No way can they be 100%. Man U will buzzing with Rooney's excellent performance midweek and the Berbatov signing. I'd bet Man U.
As for Chelsea v Man City. This has to be Chelsea. Man City can't splash their owners' billions yet so they are still the same side that could be trounced at any minute. Sure, they got Robinho but he won't be good enough vs Deco, Ballack, Lampard, Carvalho, Terry, Cech and co. Bet the farm on Chelsea mate.
And I will whisper "no"
- Rorschach
#3
Posted 13 September 2008 - 03:19 AM
I assume the -109 on Chelsea means they are massive favourites and the 188 to 189 for Man U/Liverpool means the linemakers thinks its too close to call?
IMO (and James' too probably) Man U will beat Liverpool, they are essentially a 2-man team in Gerrard and Torres and they have both just been passed fit for this game. No way can they be 100%. Man U will buzzing with Rooney's excellent performance midweek and the Berbatov signing. I'd bet Man U.
As for Chelsea v Man City. This has to be Chelsea. Man City can't splash their owners' billions yet so they are still the same side that could be trounced at any minute. Sure, they got Robinho but he won't be good enough vs Deco, Ballack, Lampard, Carvalho, Terry, Cech and co. Bet the farm on Chelsea mate.
city at home vs city away are two different teams. portugal lost in mid week 3-2 after conceeding 3 late goals vs denmark so the portguese fella's wont be feeling great, terry was at fault for the croatia goal and most importantly essien is now out for the whole season potentially and chelsea have no replacement for him. i would definitely not bet the farm on them. i see a 1-1 draw.
Weight loss bet:
Start weight (10/01/2011) - 199.0lbs
Current weight (31/01/2011) - 194.2lbs
#4
Posted 13 September 2008 - 03:41 AM
Liverpool 0 - 1 Man Utd (Berbatov)
In the Chelsea-City match, I'm not as confident as LJB to bet the farm on Chelsea! I'm feeling an upset here, which includes a draw, but maybe a 2-2, 3-3 type scoreline... The new owners and hype + Robinho... could open the game up, quite a lot. If you can find enough of an edge in those odds (are they v v strongly putting Chelsea favourites?), I'd fancy betting on City, or the draw tbh.
#5
Posted 13 September 2008 - 04:39 AM
Ziigmund: f u luck
My favourite thread in the whole wide world
http://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poker-foru...howtopic=126798
#6
Posted 13 September 2008 - 06:01 AM
On Matchbook the odds for Man City to win is +340 and the odds for Chelsea to win is -109. Draw is +258. What's going on here? Should I just unload my entire roll on Chelsea right now? I just started using Matchbook, and I'm not sure what's going on here.
I know nothing about futbol, so there's no way for me to know who should win.
Edit: Am I retarded, because in the Liverpool-Man Utd match, Liverpool is +189 and Man U is +188. Do I just not understand soccer betting?
WHAT DONT YOU UNDERSTAND ABOUT "THE BOOKS HAVE BUILT THIS INTO THE LINE!!" ARE YOU RETARDED??? THERE IS NO WAY TO WIN UNLESS YOU BET AGAINST THE PUBLIC!!!
#7
Posted 13 September 2008 - 06:54 AM
These bets are for regulation. Only the "draw" side will cash if regulation ends in a draw. I lost enough money on EuroCup to understand the basics, at least.
I mean, RAAAAAAWWWR!
#8
Posted 13 September 2008 - 08:29 AM
-109 is not a huge favorite - and soccer bets are rigged because it's a retarded sport and you have to account for the ever common 0-0 and 1-1 tie. So you are betting on 1 of 3 outcomes, not 1 or the other. (Shootouts don't count for breaking the tie if there is one)
[15:06] <Jan99> go J E T S
#10
Posted 13 September 2008 - 10:24 AM
#11
Posted 13 September 2008 - 10:37 AM
Liverpool won 2-1 btw.
Edit: Tomorrow, Milan -109 Genoa +400. I'm going to take my Chelsea winnings and put it on Milan, I guess
#12
Posted 13 September 2008 - 11:01 AM
Liverpool won 2-1 btw.
Edit: Tomorrow, Milan -109 Genoa +400. I'm going to take my Chelsea winnings and put it on Milan, I guess
At matchbook you can just bet the "Draw: no" option.
I mean, RAAAAAAWWWR!
#13
Posted 13 September 2008 - 11:19 AM
Yea, but the 'no draw' odds in the Liv-Man U match were like -275.
#14
Posted 13 September 2008 - 11:27 AM
Liverpool won 2-1 btw.
Edit: Tomorrow, Milan -109 Genoa +400. I'm going to take my Chelsea winnings and put it on Milan, I guess
Assuming the +190 is an accurate price for an outright victory for both sides, the "No Draw" option should be something like +225ish.
I mean, RAAAAAAWWWR!
#15
Posted 13 September 2008 - 11:34 AM
Ya sorry, it was + not -.
#16
Posted 13 September 2008 - 11:43 AM
Actually, I meant to type -225. Draw should be +225, no draw should be -225. Or thereabouts.
This conversation is going pretty well so far. I'm gonna go see if I can figure out how in the fuck SC is going to cover against GA.
I mean, RAAAAAAWWWR!
#17
Posted 13 September 2008 - 11:49 AM
This conversation is going pretty well so far. I'm gonna go see if I can figure out how in the fuck SC is going to cover against GA.
Haha, I know. I came back to say I was originally correct using the -. I think this is just an example why Americans don't do soccer.
Do you see what I'm saying about the Chelsea match today and the Milan match tomorrow?
#18
Posted 13 September 2008 - 01:29 PM
AC Milan -110
Siena -101
Hannover -101
Vfl Bochum -101
Villarreal +105
If some soccer fans would like to chime in with any thoughts, they would be greatly appreciated, as I can't name a single player on either of these teams.
And I'm setting my alarm for 8am tomorrow to watch the Milan-Genoa match.
#19
Posted 13 September 2008 - 03:45 PM
AC Milan -110
Siena -101
Hannover -101
Vfl Bochum -101
Villarreal +105
If some soccer fans would like to chime in with any thoughts, they would be greatly appreciated, as I can't name a single player on either of these teams.
And I'm setting my alarm for 8am tomorrow to watch the Milan-Genoa match.
This site can tell you more than anyone could post here, about match statistics, predictions, betting advice, head to head stats, streaks, form, team news, injury/suspension lists etc etc.
http://www.betstudy.com/soccer-stats/match...c-milan-666530/
That link goes straight to the stats between Genoa and Milan. For someone from the US, starting to bet on football matches where they don't know the players names, or much about the teams... it could prove extremely valuable.
You can go to the bar at the top, scroll over 'soccer statistics', and the drop down menu gives you all the options for every league.
This is the injury/suspension list, for Italy... could be useful if you haven't heard that 2 or 3 main players will not start a game. http://www.betstudy.com/injured/italy.html
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










