Matt Damon Plays Poker , Correct ? Daniel ... This Guy Should Be ...

[johns76222 0]

Dead money on the felt -- Check out this clip. "I need to know if she really thinks Dinasours were here 4000 years ago -- I need to know that -- She will have the nuclear codes."This guy is a Cretin.http://www.breitbart.tv/html/171553.html

[jmkiser 0]

Dead money on the felt -- Check out this clip. "I need to know if she really thinks Dinasours were here 4000 years ago -- I need to know that -- She will have the nuclear codes."This guy is a Cretin.http://www.breitbart.tv/html/171553.html

I loved Matt Damon in that clip. And I think anyone who bashes him for being a Hollywood liberal as "being pro-active" while in the spotlight is completely dishonest.He's in the limelight as a famous actor. He was asked about his opinion from the interviewer. He gave his very honest opinion. That doesn't qualify him as a "cretin".I am also concerned (like Matt Damon) about leaders who are serious about Creationism. It's the biggest load of crap that is attempting to be forced down our throats as "legitimate scientific ideas". It's bad enough that this society has to deal with religious fundamentalists, but a person vying for a position of real authority that spouts this outrageous crap is a real concern.He was honest in being frightened about Sarah Palin becoming president just like many of us are. His joke about the bad Disney movie was funny. He had the ability to recognize that Palin was picked for political purposes and not by her qualifications for a presidential administration.You can disagree with the things he says, but you have absolutely no ground to stand on by calling him a cretin because of his answer.Why is he a cretin and not irishguy or other liberal posters on FCP? Because I'm sure their opinions on Palin would match up.

[irishguy 14]

Asked his opinion and gives it. What a cretin.Gives hundred of thousands to millions of dollars to charity and countless hours of his time. What a cretin.From all accounts is generally a nice person to work with or be around in general. What a cretin.

[copernicus 0]

I loved Matt Damon in that clip. And I think anyone who bashes him for being a Hollywood liberal as "being pro-active" while in the spotlight is completely dishonest.He's in the limelight as a famous actor. He was asked about his opinion from the interviewer. He gave his very honest opinion. That doesn't qualify him as a "cretin".

his claim of looking at actuarial tables and claiming they show >33% chance of death in the next 4 years qualifies him as a cretin. Hes either a liar or doesnt have a clue about what he read.

[irishguy 14]

his claim of looking at actuarial tables and claiming they show >33% chance of death in the next 4 years qualifies him as a cretin. Hes either a liar or doesnt have a clue about what he read.

If being wrong on the percent qualifies him as a cretin. What does talking down to everyone and belittling those who see the world differently with countless immature names and snide remarks qualify you as?

[copernicus 0]

If being wrong on the percent qualifies him as a cretin. What does talking down to everyone and belittling those who see the world differently with countless immature names and snide remarks qualify you as?

I dont belittle anyone for seeing the world differently, I belittle them for being so gd stupid they cant defend their positions coherently. and as one of the prime objects of my snide remarks, you know where that puts you.

[Sportsmack 0]

Just LOL @ all these d-bags that claim they "know nothing about Sarah Palin, yet bash her before they even attempt to get to know what she's about. That's an awesome way to try to get to know somebody. "Hi, I don't know you or what you're about, but chances are I can't stand you."If anyone's out of touch...it's Hollywood

[copernicus 0]

Just LOL @ all these d-bags that claim they "know nothing about Sarah Palin, yet bash her before they even attempt to get to know what she's about. That's an awesome way to try to get to know somebody. "Hi, I don't know you or what you're about, but chances are I can't stand you."If anyone's out of touch...it's Hollywood

except for James Woods. He's awesome. I wish he'd be as active as he was in the last election.

[irishguy 14]

I dont belittle anyone for seeing the world differently, I belittle them for being so gd stupid they cant defend their positions coherently. and as one of the prime objects of my snide remarks, you know where that puts you.

I explain my opinions rather coherently you just choose to close your eyes and ignore it and show no respect to anyone other then those that follow your views. I can't remember a thread that didn't turn into you being a prick to people(perhaps I just beat you too it this time). I don't know where you went to school but its clear that you're inteligent its just a shame they you never learned tact or class.

[copernicus 0]

I explain my opinions rather coherently you just choose to close your eyes and ignore it and show no respect to anyone other then those that follow your views. I can't remember a thread that didn't turn into you being a prick to people(perhaps I just beat you too it this time). I don't know where you went to school but its clear that you're inteligent its just a shame they you never learned tact or class.

i treat people the way they treat me. grab a mirror

[irishguy 14]

i treat people the way they treat me. grab a mirror

Sir before this thread if I was ever snide or disrespectful to you out of anything other then retaliation I sincerely apologize but I am very confident that has never been the case.

[irishguy 14]

Just LOL @ all these d-bags that claim they "know nothing about Sarah Palin, yet bash her before they even attempt to get to know what she's about. That's an awesome way to try to get to know somebody. "Hi, I don't know you or what you're about, but chances are I can't stand you."If anyone's out of touch...it's Hollywood

So people know far to little about her to judge her negatively but conservatives know enough about her to sing her praise? Huh?

[brvheart 1,768]

I loved Matt Damon in that clip. And I think anyone who bashes him for being a Hollywood liberal as "being pro-active" while in the spotlight is completely dishonest.He's in the limelight as a famous actor. He was asked about his opinion from the interviewer. He gave his very honest opinion. That doesn't qualify him as a "cretin".I am also concerned (like Matt Damon) about leaders who are serious about Creationism. It's the biggest load of crap that is attempting to be forced down our throats as "legitimate scientific ideas". It's bad enough that this society has to deal with religious fundamentalists, but a person vying for a position of real authority that spouts this outrageous crap is a real concern.He was honest in being frightened about Sarah Palin becoming president just like many of us are. His joke about the bad Disney movie was funny. He had the ability to recognize that Palin was picked for political purposes and not by her qualifications for a presidential administration.You can disagree with the things he says, but you have absolutely no ground to stand on by calling him a cretin because of his answer.Why is he a cretin and not irishguy or other liberal posters on FCP? Because I'm sure their opinions on Palin would match up.

Start with George Washington and name for me all the presidents to didn't believe in Creationism. After you're done and you find a few, then I'll give you the names of some that did believe in Creationism and we will compare how good they were as president. GO!

[jmkiser 0]

his claim of looking at actuarial tables and claiming they show >33% chance of death in the next 4 years qualifies him as a cretin. Hes either a liar or doesnt have a clue about what he read.

lol you've almost opened yourself up to this one"Sooooo someone who speaks/acts off of bad information is a cretin? /wink wink wink"Realistically, though, if the difference between the 33% and the actual 12% does NOT make him a cretin. He is voicing a very REAL concern that a McCain president makes people worried about his longevity. And with Palin as the VP, we feel that we're pretty much ****ed. I am NOT saying that Obama is going to be messiah in office. So don't turn around and accuse me of being an Obama supporter.But this attack on Matt Damon's character by calling him a cretin is a COMPLETE load of crap. All of us have said MANY worse things on these forums alone.

[jmkiser 0]

Start with George Washington and name for me all the presidents to didn't believe in Creationism. After you're done and you find a few, then I'll give you the names of some that did believe in Creationism and we will compare how good they were as president. GO!

LOLthis is A HUGE joke!!!!!First off, the information coming out of the modern day creationist movement is NOT dated back to George Washington so you couldn't even claim they're on your side if you wanted to.The technology, back then, did not exist to give us the understanding of reality that we have today. There is absolutely no excuse for outrageous creationist bullshit that is completely unfounded. And I do sincerely doubt the PRESIDENTIAL judgment of a person who STILL (with ALL of the resources that we have today) spouts this crap.And I'm sure George Washington wasn't spouting his proud beliefs that Jesus was buddies with a gd brontosaurus. So why don't you try bringing some honesty into this discussion instead of trying to create unintelligible traps with completely dishonest intentions?If I lived in the 1700's, I might believe some crazy shit, too.Today, you have absolutely no excuse. You can get away with all kinds of spiritual stuff that can't be held to scientific observation, but you can NOT get away with lying about the age of the earth when we can show you incontrovertible evidence otherwise.

[20TN40 0]

LOLthis is A HUGE joke!!!!!First off, the information coming out of the modern day creationist movement is NOT dated back to George Washington so you couldn't even claim they're on your side if you wanted to. What do modern day creationists say?The technology, back then, did not exist to give us the understanding of reality that we have today. There is absolutely no excuse for outrageous creationist bullshit that is completely unfounded. And I do sincerely doubt the PRESIDENTIAL judgment of a person who STILL (with ALL of the resources that we have today) spouts this crap. So who was the last President you believe had good judgement?And I'm sure George Washington wasn't spouting his proud beliefs that Jesus was buddies with a gd brontosaurus. So why don't you try bringing some honesty into this discussion instead of trying to create unintelligible traps with completely dishonest intentions?If I lived in the 1700's, I might believe some crazy shit, too.Today, you have absolutely no excuse. You can get away with all kinds of spiritual stuff that can't be held to scientific observation, but you can NOT get away with lying about the age of the earth when we can show you incontrovertible evidence otherwise. Who has ever lied about the age of the earth?

[jmkiser 0]

What do modern day creationists say?

I'm sure you can do your own research. Here's a start for you, though.15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense

So who was the last President you believe had good judgement?

This is relevant how?

Who has ever lied about the age of the earth?

..... Creationists .... are you not following this argument very well?

[Mercury69 3]

Dead money on the felt -- Check out this clip. "I need to know if she really thinks Dinasours were here 4000 years ago -- I need to know that -- She will have the nuclear codes."This guy is a Cretin.http://www.breitbart.tv/html/171553.html

And you are a fckn douchebag

[CaneBrain 97]

his claim of looking at actuarial tables and claiming they show >33% chance of death in the next 4 years qualifies him as a cretin. Hes either a liar or doesnt have a clue about what he read.

you have this habit of watching/reading someone write/talk about 15 ideas and then picking the one you dont like and only commenting on that. besides the actuary comment, what did you think of the rest? I got the feeling that Mr. Damon feels the same way a lot of people do about Sara Palin and that his reasons are legitimate. Just because he should stay away from pretending to be an insurance wizard does not mean the rest of what he said is invalid.

[hblask 1]

First, I mostly don't care what celebrities think. Why should I?Second, some people do care, so they asked him, and he answered. What's the big deal?Third, answers like that show why the Palin pick was genius. People start looking at her experience, and then say instead I'll vote for Obama, whose experience includes.... well, it's pretty similar to Palin, except Obama has no executive level experience while she does. And he's at the top of the ticket, she's only the VP. And people who care what celebrities think are probably more susceptible to these kinds of arguments.

[LongLiveYorke 38]

Start with George Washington and name for me all the presidents to didn't believe in Creationism. After you're done and you find a few, then I'll give you the names of some that did believe in Creationism and we will compare how good they were as president. GO!

Too lazy to do the research. Why don't you just give us the list and then we'll talk.

[copernicus 0]

lol you've almost opened yourself up to this one"Sooooo someone who speaks/acts off of bad information is a cretin? /wink wink wink"Realistically, though, if the difference between the 33% and the actual 12% does NOT make him a cretin. He is voicing a very REAL concern that a McCain president makes people worried about his longevity. And with Palin as the VP, we feel that we're pretty much ****ed. I am NOT saying that Obama is going to be messiah in office. So don't turn around and accuse me of being an Obama supporter.But this attack on Matt Damon's character by calling him a cretin is a COMPLETE load of crap. All of us have said MANY worse things on these forums alone.

12% isnt right either. I dont know where youre getting that. Actuary would probably have more specific tables than I have, but adjusting standard tables for his particular situation the probability is less than 5%.Why is "cretin" a character attack? I know plenty of idiots of fine character.

[Balloon guy 158]

Too lazy to do the research. Why don't you just give us the list and then we'll talk.

I for one am holding my breath worrying about Chester B Arther.I want to like him, but fear he may disagree with me about something which means I must hate him.But Rutherford B. Hayes, he can die in a grease fire the swine!

[copernicus 0]

LOLthis is A HUGE joke!!!!!First off, the information coming out of the modern day creationist movement is NOT dated back to George Washington so you couldn't even claim they're on your side if you wanted to.The technology, back then, did not exist to give us the understanding of reality that we have today. There is absolutely no excuse for outrageous creationist bullshit that is completely unfounded. And I do sincerely doubt the PRESIDENTIAL judgment of a person who STILL (with ALL of the resources that we have today) spouts this crap.And I'm sure George Washington wasn't spouting his proud beliefs that Jesus was buddies with a gd brontosaurus. So why don't you try bringing some honesty into this discussion instead of trying to create unintelligible traps with completely dishonest intentions?If I lived in the 1700's, I might believe some crazy shit, too.Today, you have absolutely no excuse. You can get away with all kinds of spiritual stuff that can't be held to scientific observation, but you can NOT get away with lying about the age of the earth when we can show you incontrovertible evidence otherwise.

Sorry, but you miss the "gotcha" in any creationism/evolution discussion. The Bible is literally true but god set up everything to LOOK like it was older, like there is evolution, etc etc etc, and you CANNOT prove otherwise. There is no such thing as "incontrovertible evidence" when youre dealing with an omnicsicent, all powerful entity. What motive would he have to "fool" everyone? Irony? To test "true believers"? Who knows, but you cant disprove god (or anything else for that matter) using science.

[Balloon guy 158]

Sorry, but you miss the "gotcha" in any creationism/evolution discussion. The Bible is literally true but god set up everything to LOOK like it was older, like there is evolution, etc etc etc, and you CANNOT prove otherwise. There is no such thing as "incontrovertible evidence" when youre dealing with an omnicsicent, all powerful entity. What motive would he have to "fool" everyone? Irony? To test "true believers"? Who knows, but you cant disprove god (or anything else for that matter) using science.

How old was the Earth when God made it? Gotcha