nice life.
Busto...
#1
Posted 04 September 2008 - 09:51 PM
nice life.
1) Spewing chips all over the place while worrying about keeping your green line above your blue
2) Playing Acid's style
Bit of a Downer. 10.30Let's mix it up a little
#2
Posted 04 September 2008 - 09:53 PM
BigKamp: yyou lose
BigKamp has 15 seconds left to act
BigKamp calls $24.50, and is all in
Seat 1: BigKamp (small blind) mucked [Ad Ac] - a full house, Aces full of Kings
Seat 2: Snamuh (big blind) showed [Kd Kh] and won ($102.50) with four of a kind, Kings
Snamuh: you lose
#3
Posted 04 September 2008 - 09:54 PM
Thank god. I was reallllllllly scared when I read the title.
#4
Posted 04 September 2008 - 10:00 PM
nice try tho
Al_smooth: I hear sucking out is all the rage
#5
Posted 04 September 2008 - 10:05 PM
dude, dont ruin it so quick. that kills all the "told you so's" that were coming
free bankroll on AP/UB no deposit required
#6
Posted 04 September 2008 - 10:11 PM
#7
Posted 04 September 2008 - 10:14 PM
#8
Posted 04 September 2008 - 10:20 PM

My pro career so far.
#9
Posted 04 September 2008 - 10:33 PM
People going bust=bad bankroll management.
Minimum 60 buy ins in my book. MINIMUM.
You will not go bust. variance will also be less as you will play stakes below your level meaning a more constant stream of young money, cash money.
Sit n go's i recommend a 100 buy in minimum. I absolutely kid you not.
It works too. Scope me. Dundasdoz.
#10
Posted 04 September 2008 - 10:37 PM
People going bust=bad bankroll management.
Minimum 60 buy ins in my book. MINIMUM.
You will not go bust. variance will also be less as you will play stakes below your level meaning a more constant stream of young money, cash money.
Sit n go's i recommend a 100 buy in minimum. I absolutely kid you not.
It works too. Scope me. Dundasdoz.
que?
#11
Posted 04 September 2008 - 10:52 PM
People going bust=bad bankroll management.
Minimum 60 buy ins in my book. MINIMUM.
You will not go bust. variance will also be less as you will play stakes below your level meaning a more constant stream of young money, cash money.
Sit n go's i recommend a 100 buy in minimum. I absolutely kid you not.
It works too. Scope me. Dundasdoz.
Thanks for your words of wisdom!!!
I will never go broke again!!!!
TILT name: ADDILAC299
AP name:NODAKNUTZ
#12
Posted 04 September 2008 - 10:52 PM
People going bust=bad bankroll management.
Minimum 60 buy ins in my book. MINIMUM.
You will not go bust. variance will also be less as you will play stakes below your level meaning a more constant stream of young money, cash money.
Sit n go's i recommend a 100 buy in minimum. I absolutely kid you not.
It works too. Scope me. Dundasdoz.
If somebody is a losing player we should expect them to go broke in the long run, no matter how careful they are with bankroll management. Acid sucks at poker.
Hitler was not motivated by hate.
Gervais: What do you worry about, that you've heard on the news?
Pilkington: I heard something about worms getting teeth.
#13
Posted 04 September 2008 - 10:57 PM
Foxtrot Yankee Papa.
#14
Posted 04 September 2008 - 11:02 PM
People going bust=bad bankroll management.
Minimum 60 buy ins in my book. MINIMUM.
You will not go bust. variance will also be less as you will play stakes below your level meaning a more constant stream of young money, cash money.
Sit n go's i recommend a 100 buy in minimum. I absolutely kid you not.
It works too. Scope me. Dundasdoz.
If I followed that I would be playing $.0001-.0002
#15
Posted 04 September 2008 - 11:05 PM
Laugh Out Loud
#16
Posted 05 September 2008 - 02:40 AM
Surface is truth.
Reality is no.
Why? i shall explain my good friend.
Very good friend.
If someone has an ounce of competition in them....if they are well rolled and see their stack dwindling they will almost certainly seek to improve their game before it all runs out.
Big roll buys time i guess.
Visiting this forum is a good start.
If someone takes my advice then makes no effort to improve............well hes a loser, not just in poker.....but in life. Its a sign of an unmotivated person....or nieve person.
#17
Posted 05 September 2008 - 03:08 AM
#18
Posted 05 September 2008 - 03:12 AM
That should be Lima Oscar Lima, India Mike Oscar.
#19
Posted 05 September 2008 - 03:21 AM
Quebec Foxtrot Tango
#20
Posted 05 September 2008 - 03:35 AM
There are certain words which, when spelled incorrectly, makes it hard for one to take their author seriously. 'Naive' is one of those words.
Hitler was not motivated by hate.
Gervais: What do you worry about, that you've heard on the news?
Pilkington: I heard something about worms getting teeth.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










