Should Hands Like This Be Played More Aggressivly

[antistuff 0]

i figure he probably doesn't have anything to pay me off with, i should just try let him give some money away.Full Tilt PokerPot Limit Omaha Ring gameBlinds: $0.25/$0.505 playersConverterStack sizes:UTG: $60.70CO: $50Button: $28.95SB: $38.40Hero: $188.10Pre-flop: (5 players) Hero is BB with A K T 6 2 folds, Button calls, SB calls, Hero checks.Flop: J A 6 ($1.5, 3 players)Hero bets $1.5, Button folds, SB calls.Turn: 6 ($4.5, 2 players)Hero checks, SB bets $2.25, Hero calls.River: 8 ($9, 2 players)Hero checks, SB bets $6, Hero calls.Results:Final pot: $21

[ROBBBIGG 0]

I'd do something silly like minraise the river. AA, JJ, and 88 beat us, but AA and JJ raises the flop because of the flush draw so we can get a decent amount of value from his 6xxx hand. We would probably be smart to fold to a reraise though.edit: and I think the reason we don't lead out on the river is some flushes won't call, but will probably bet if checked to.

[BudBundy 0]

Bet turn.Bet river.edit : I think the main reason we should bet river is some flushes will call but they will check behind if we check because they have showdown value now.

[ROBBBIGG 0]

Bet turn.Bet river.edit : I think the main reason we should bet river is some flushes will call but they will check behind if we check because they have showdown value now.

I guess it depends on how aggro vs passive villain is.