gfdsa146 0 Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 Hand #192291307347 Card Stud *High-Low* ($0.50/$1.00), Ante $0.05, Bring-In $0.25 *3rd Street* - (0.80 SB)MilesAM: xx xx 8c___foldsdrywalljeff: xx xx Td___callspokerpro513: xx xx 9h___foldsRockBS: xx xx Ad___callsgfdsa146: 4s 7s 3h___*brings-in*bowling1864: xx xx 5c___foldsklax7: xx xx 6c___foldsgazelle_AA: xx xx Ah___folds*4th Street* - (2.30 SB)drywalljeff: xx xx Td 5s___callsRockBS: xx xx Ad Ts___*bets*gfdsa146: 4s 7s 3h 2h___calls*5th Street* - (2.65 BB)drywalljeff: xx xx Td 5s Tc___*bets*RockBS: xx xx Ad Ts 9s___callsgfdsa146: 4s 7s 3h 2h Jc___calls*6th Street* - (5.65 BB)drywalljeff: xx xx Td 5s Tc 6s___*bets*___callsRockBS: xx xx Ad Ts 9s 7c___calls___callsgfdsa146: 4s 7s 3h 2h Jc 8d___raises*River* - (11.65 BB)drywalljeff: xx xx Td 5s Tc 6s xx___*checks*___callsRockBS: xx xx Ad Ts 9s 7c xx___checks___callsgfdsa146: 4s 7s 3h 2h Jc 8d 4h___bets*Total pot:* (14.65 BB) Link to post Share on other sites
ahosang 0 Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 Yes, since it is very very likely that you have the only low based on previous betting. I'd be shocked if either of them could show a low here. If rockbs does have low, then follow him to every stud8 game until he is broke. If he is not paired on 5th, the only hand that could explain him continuing is 2 low spades in the hole... Link to post Share on other sites
quadaces 0 Posted July 30, 2008 Share Posted July 30, 2008 Yeah I think I would bet although I dont think checking is that bad. You should have the only low even though it's not the board lock low. You do have an 8 7 so if one of them backed into a low they probably have you beat. Link to post Share on other sites
Frez 0 Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 I think when checked around it's worth a bet here. First to act I may just check/call. I guess to make it mathematically correct to bet your one way hand here, you have to be 67% sure you have the best low. Link to post Share on other sites
fitzinabox 0 Posted July 31, 2008 Share Posted July 31, 2008 i refuse to read it because that hand history is just so poor. ill go out on a limb and say bet. Link to post Share on other sites
gfdsa146 0 Posted July 31, 2008 Author Share Posted July 31, 2008 i refuse to read it because that hand history is just so poor. ill go out on a limb and say bet.poor as in ease of reading it? or poor as in poor play? Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now