My Last Day As A Leaf Fan
#1
Posted 21 July 2008 - 09:52 PM
Years have gone by now and Rask has already beat the Leafs once (get used to it) and Raycroft is now long gone. Finally, they did what they should have done that season and signed free agent Curtis Joseph to the team as a temporary solution without giving up their powerful prospect duo in net. They could have kept them both, not paid Raycroft a bunch of money for nothing, and then gone into this season with Rask as a back up goalie or even in the AHL. Or, moving him or Pogge to another team for help on defense or a prospect at center.
I'm hoping to return as a fan is I see them dedicate themselves to a long term plan and I thought Fletcher did an excellent job at the draft moving up to #5. Let this team get young, go through growing pains and STOP putting band aids on the development of the franchise by signing 30 something players to make them competitive.
The Leafs are actually the one franchise where it would be EASIEST to build a dynasty because even if the team loses every game the seats would be filled. Sure people would complain, but they would show up and they would wait.

#2
Posted 21 July 2008 - 11:08 PM
wow, really, that was what did it for you?
Your roughly my age (mid 30's), we both grew up in Toronto in the 80's, and it took until then? I jumped off long before you.
I was a sad kid when they moved out Sittler/McDonald and I got more pissed when they traded a first rounder to get....Tom Kurvers. Giving up S.Niedermayer and nearly blowing ELindros. Or as I like to call him, Forsberg-Ricci-Hextall-Dushesne-2Firsts.
And then the pick that would become Luongo was sent to reclaim the rights to a 60year old Wendel....and i was done. And countless other moves too many to mention, not nearly as dramatic maybe, but all the same type.
Tukka Rask never made it on my radar.
I'd love to get back on board, but i just see nothing. I'd accept a 5year rebuild in a heartbeat, but see no signs of greatness, ever, with these guys.
Sorry Serge, I know this pisses you off, but its such a downer being a huge hockey fan in this great hockey market, with this sorry excuse for an franchise over the last 20+ years.
#3
Posted 22 July 2008 - 03:30 AM

#4
Posted 22 July 2008 - 04:05 AM
#5
Posted 22 July 2008 - 04:09 AM
Tukko Rask is nowhere close to being an NHL goalie, and probably will never be.
#6
Posted 22 July 2008 - 05:05 AM
Of course. It has NOTHING to do with the team that's put on the ice.
#7
Posted 22 July 2008 - 06:10 AM
N0, serge, the reason the team struggles is because of fans like YOU. If the fanbase in toronto would stop throwing their money at a team that is simply horrible, then management would have long ago been forced to embark on a serious mission to improve and CONTINUE to improve this team. Simple comparison? The Toronto Raptors. When the team's poor performance started to affect the box office, the board stepped up, brought in an 'A' calibre GM, and proceeded to work at full speed towards a mandate of improving the team both in the short term and the long run. When the leafs were being run into the ground in the 70's and 80's by Harold Ballard, the arena was still full, and they were still on TV every saturday night. Now, they have been horrible since 2003, and fans still blindly support the team.
If anything, serge, you should wake up every morning and THANK the media. If the media hadn't called a spade a spade and put the spotlight on just how horribly this team was being run, you wouldn't have at least the semblance now of moving in a positive direction. If every day's papers for the past four years had been full of 'Oh my goodness the leafs are sooooooo talented, and aren't we lucky to have Andrew Raycroft and Kyle Wellwood playing here', then there would be no Cliff Fletcher, no gutting of the team to move ahead, no Luke Schenn, and no hope.
Here's a poker analogy for you serge...... if YOU were the poker media, and the leafs were Absolute Poker.... people would still be getting cheated in high stakes games. Because someone, SOMEWHERE has to blow the whistle on stupidity. So blame the media if you like.....
#8
Posted 22 July 2008 - 06:59 AM
If anything, serge, you should wake up every morning and THANK the media. If the media hadn't called a spade a spade and put the spotlight on just how horribly this team was being run, you wouldn't have at least the semblance now of moving in a positive direction. If every day's papers for the past four years had been full of 'Oh my goodness the leafs are sooooooo talented, and aren't we lucky to have Andrew Raycroft and Kyle Wellwood playing here', then there would be no Cliff Fletcher, no gutting of the team to move ahead, no Luke Schenn, and no hope.
Here's a poker analogy for you serge...... if YOU were the poker media, and the leafs were Absolute Poker.... people would still be getting cheated in high stakes games. Because someone, SOMEWHERE has to blow the whistle on stupidity. So blame the media if you like.....
your comments are always appreciated and respected..However when I say the media and the so called bandwagons fans affect the team , I will give you a few examples.
Larry Murphy who was an All Star defenseman was run out of town because of a couple of overblown plays..He went onto win 2 Stanley Cups.
Andrew Raycroft...Andrew Raycroft was sold as the next Vezina candidate when he came in. He buckled under the pressure and couldnt survive in this town. I hope he does well in Colorado.
Bryan McCabe..This is the perfect example of how the media/fans can affect a players perceived value and performance. Bryan McCabe was and continues to be a very good defenceman in this league. Once again a few overblown plays that get front page coverage distorts the value of McCabe to the Leafs to the point of him being branded one of the worst players in the NHL. This is ludicrous, ok maybe his salary is a little overpriced, but that was the market when he was signed. The casual Leafs fan(ie Daniel) doesnt watch 60 minutes of the Leafs night in and night out. They see the cover of the Sun or a highlight on TSN of McCabe having a bad night and BOOM instant credibility to the media.
Kyle Wellwood...Another player who just couldnt handle the spotlight and the constant intrusion of the spotlight.
Jason Blake......Before he even stepped on the ice he was vilified for signing a huge contract at his age. He went onto have a career year in assists while going through a very scary and life threatening disease. The media concentrated on this 15 goals he scored, nothing else.
The Leafs success(yes off the ice) is also their downfall. It takes a special kind of player to play in this city. Some players like Gilmour,Clark,Sundin thrive on it...Some players just cant handle 20 reporters in their face for a Monday afternoon practice.
The Harold Ballard era was a right off in the 80s that took a long time to fix. We fixed it and had very competitive teams for the most part of the 90s. I believe the Leafs were one of the top teams in the NHL for a good stretch, yes we didnt win a CUP , but so didnt a lot of other teams. The new NHL handcuffed the Leafs by them having to change their philosophy. No longer could we go and get free agents to compete, we have changed the mentality and we will be back
GO LEAFS GO
#9
Posted 22 July 2008 - 07:36 AM
Larry Murphy who was an All Star defenseman was run out of town because of a couple of overblown plays..He went onto win 2 Stanley Cups.
Andrew Raycroft...Andrew Raycroft was sold as the next Vezina candidate when he came in. He buckled under the pressure and couldnt survive in this town. I hope he does well in Colorado.
Bryan McCabe..This is the perfect example of how the media/fans can affect a players perceived value and performance. Bryan McCabe was and continues to be a very good defenceman in this league. Once again a few overblown plays that get front page coverage distorts the value of McCabe to the Leafs to the point of him being branded one of the worst players in the NHL. This is ludicrous, ok maybe his salary is a little overpriced, but that was the market when he was signed. The casual Leafs fan(ie Daniel) doesnt watch 60 minutes of the Leafs night in and night out. They see the cover of the Sun or a highlight on TSN of McCabe having a bad night and BOOM instant credibility to the media.
Kyle Wellwood...Another player who just couldnt handle the spotlight and the constant intrusion of the spotlight.
Jason Blake......Before he even stepped on the ice he was vilified for signing a huge contract at his age. He went onto have a career year in assists while going through a very scary and life threatening disease. The media concentrated on this 15 goals he scored, nothing else.
The Leafs success(yes off the ice) is also their downfall. It takes a special kind of player to play in this city. Some players like Gilmour,Clark,Sundin thrive on it...Some players just cant handle 20 reporters in their face for a Monday afternoon practice.
The Harold Ballard era was a right off in the 80s that took a long time to fix. We fixed it and had very competitive teams for the most part of the 90s. I believe the Leafs were one of the top teams in the NHL for a good stretch, yes we didnt win a CUP , but so didnt a lot of other teams. The new NHL handcuffed the Leafs by them having to change their philosophy. No longer could we go and get free agents to compete, we have changed the mentality and we will be back
GO LEAFS GO
Did you actually read my post? Wow......... there is the asstrich, with full plumage...
#10
Posted 22 July 2008 - 07:44 AM
Larry Murphy who was an All Star defenseman was run out of town because of a couple of overblown plays..He went onto win 2 Stanley Cups.
the media had next to nothing to do with this. The fans and their ignorance ran him out of town in my mind.
oh, and i forgot to add the Leafs fans' are also one of the biggest reasons why I no longer wanted to be known as one. I didn't want to give the impression I neither cared about hockey (which some fans really dont, they are just Leafs fans), or that I thought the GM should trade Belak+Ondurs+1st rounder for Lecavalier. I dont know whats worse, the suits who dont care at the game, or the idiots who think they know hockey cause they watch Leafs games at the bar.
not aimed you Serge, I always respect your loyalty, though it does appear a little blind at times. Your the guy in Fever Pitch, the Red Sox movie. I like that kind of passion for home team and history, wish i still had it.
#11
Posted 22 July 2008 - 08:01 AM
oh, and i forgot to add the Leafs fans' are also one of the biggest reasons why I no longer wanted to be known as one. I didn't want to give the impression I neither cared about hockey (which some fans really dont, they are just Leafs fans), or that I thought the GM should trade Belak+Ondurs+1st rounder for Lecavalier. I dont know whats worse, the suits who dont care at the game, or the idiots who think they know hockey cause they watch Leafs games at the bar.
not aimed you Serge, I always respect your loyalty, though it does appear a little blind at times. Your the guy in Fever Pitch, the Red Sox movie. I like that kind of passion for home team and history, wish i still had it.
There are varying kind of Leafs fans..
There are guys like me who are loyal to the end and we will support them all the time.
There are fans that are only fans when they win, and love to bitch and complain about everything the Leafs do..ie Daniel, Gruven
Then there are stupid fans who think that the Leafs suck because they didnt trade Belak for Lecavalier.
I am proud to be a Leafs fan. I will never give up on them EVER...
Thanks
#12
Posted 22 July 2008 - 08:08 AM
I think this is a faulty statement.
I'm confident that both of the individuals you mentioned would happily be fans if the Leafs were losing, as part of a rebuilding plan, rather than losing with no foresight, aside from striving for mediocrity.
Therefore, they are not only fans when they win.
#13
Posted 22 July 2008 - 08:18 AM
I'm confident that both of the individuals you mentioned would happily be fans if the Leafs were losing, as part of a rebuilding plan, rather than losing with no foresight, aside from striving for mediocrity.
Therefore, they are not only fans when they win.
Its a 100% accurate..
The whole rebuilding bullshit is so overrated...Do you think teams like Chicago and LA will ever compete..NO , they can rebuild forever..
Then there are the Penguins..The history of the franchise looks like this..
Last place for 7 years, compete for a CUP..Lose on purpose to get top draft picks..
REPEAT..
BLAH BLAH FRICKING BLAH>
#14
Posted 22 July 2008 - 08:30 AM
The whole rebuilding bullshit is so overrated...Do you think teams like Chicago and LA will ever compete..NO , they can rebuild forever..
Then there are the Penguins..The history of the franchise looks like this..
Last place for 7 years, compete for a CUP..Lose on purpose to get top draft picks..
REPEAT..
BLAH BLAH FRICKING BLAH>
I would certainly take that over 9th or 10th every single year.
The Pens case is a bit extreme, because it was ownership and mismanagement that caused them to lose for as long as they did. A normal rebuilding should take much shorter now. Look at the Flyers of the last two seasons, for example.
The Hawks are a case of poor ownership as well, but it won't take them long at all to compete deep into the playoffs again. This year, possibly next.
The Leafs, unfortunately, are no where near where the Hawks are, or the Kings, for that matter. And they only have a couple of semi decent prospects in the ranks.
#15
Posted 22 July 2008 - 08:36 AM
Buffalo, Ottawa and Pittsburgh would of been bankrupt for a variety of reasons before the NHL stepped in to change the rules in their favour. Every change that the NHL has implemented has been in effect been against the Leafs. Its almost like Bettman says the Leafs make money, lets think of ways so they cant compete with the other small market teams. Lets take away ALL their advantages..
**** you Bettman
#16
Posted 22 July 2008 - 08:51 AM
Buffalo, Ottawa and Pittsburgh would of been bankrupt for a variety of reasons before the NHL stepped in to change the rules in their favour. Every change that the NHL has implemented has been in effect been against the Leafs. Its almost like Bettman says the Leafs make money, lets think of ways so they cant compete with the other small market teams. Lets take away ALL their advantages..
**** you Bettman
So now that the playing field is level, they can't compete?
I think you're fighting the wrong side of your argument.
#17
Posted 22 July 2008 - 08:54 AM
I think you're fighting the wrong side of your argument.
it wasnt ever level..The rules were changed instantly with no warning...It takes a while to recuperate from the effects of it...
In the next 30 years the leafs will win more cups than the Penguins,Hawks and Kings put together.
#18
Posted 22 July 2008 - 09:00 AM
Buffalo, Ottawa and Pittsburgh would of been bankrupt for a variety of reasons before the NHL stepped in to change the rules in their favour. Every change that the NHL has implemented has been in effect been against the Leafs. Its almost like Bettman says the Leafs make money, lets think of ways so they cant compete with the other small market teams. Lets take away ALL their advantages..
**** you Bettman
First off the Pens were bad for 5 years (4 seasons, not 7) and during that time they didn't "tank" anything. They rebuilt. Not only were they lucky to get the players but there's no guarantees that their players would be as dominant as they are in the NHL. I know it sounds crazy but sometimes you have to blow up some old decrepit buildings before putting up your 5 star high rise.
Bettman's job to make sure the entire league is as healthy as possible. What has been done to the leafs that hasn't also happened to the Habs and how could they possibly win the Eastern Conference without those "advantages"?
Hahahahahaha...thanks I haven't laughed that hard in a long time.




#19
Posted 22 July 2008 - 09:01 AM
I expect Dale to ask for a bet on this one.
#20
Posted 22 July 2008 - 09:04 AM
In the next 30 years the leafs will win more cups than the Penguins,Hawks and Kings put together.
But maybe something is wrong with the Leafs and not the new NHL. Other teams made the transition, but why can't the leafs. You said something about the new nhl taking away their ability to sign free agents? Why? The Wings were pegged as a team who bought their cup wins but then the new nhl came around and the team hasn't missed a beat yet they still sign big name free agents and will continue to make a run for a cup for years to come. So I don't know if that is a valid excuse for the Leafs.
I like the Leafs, I watch their games when I can on Saturday nights, and I always looked forward to Leafs/Wings games back in the day and made sure to get tickets. But I think there is a definite flaw in the management of that team that you just don't see or choose to ignore. It is a huge market, it is an original six team, and if they had a clue, they could really get some good teams together but it seems they don't have the right people in place to make that happen.
It doesn't matter who you start because you have a horse shoe up your ass so far I'm not really sure how you get through the day. You must be gay.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










