Why Don't Casinos Sponsor Players?
#1
Posted 15 July 2008 - 05:24 AM
#2
Posted 15 July 2008 - 05:25 AM
Didn't work out as well as they'd thought.
#3
Posted 15 July 2008 - 05:29 AM
The trouble is that most of the big names are already taken by online sites.
#4
Posted 15 July 2008 - 05:32 AM
#5
Posted 15 July 2008 - 05:34 AM
Im not sure why its not more common. Part of it may be that the casinos want their sponsored players to play exclusively at their casino, like what the Wynn wanted DN to do, or play there atleast once a week like what PH wanted the Grinder to do. This becomes a problem when the name players are playing around the world and want to play games that arent available at the casino that is sponsoring them. Still it does seem surprising that players dont wear the casinos logos for money in deals where the player can still play wherever he wants.
Also for the casinos point of view poker is still a very small part of their income and maybe its not worth it to them where as a site like Full Tilt derives all of its income from people playing poker.
#6
Posted 15 July 2008 - 05:38 AM
Wouldnt a player be able to have a online and live sponsor, but I guess you do have a point because iirc both the grinder and Scotty have both been sponsored by casinos at times where they werent sponsored by online sites.
#7
Posted 15 July 2008 - 05:49 AM
#8
Posted 15 July 2008 - 07:02 AM
Not really sponsoring but close.
Certain big names pros could get sponsored by casinos but this would probably cost them money in the long run by inhibiting them from playing at certain times or certain games. This was the reason DN gave up his deal even though he tried his hardest to generate action with the HU challenge.
#9
Posted 15 July 2008 - 07:06 AM
If an online poker site sponsors someone and they make a final table where 500,000 people see it, let's say that 2% of those people are not already signed up with an online site and/or decide to switch after seeing the player at the final table with the Full Tilt logos. Those 1000 players log on, sign up, play, etc. Some may stay, some may not. Whatever. Full Tilt gets more traffic and more exposure and more rake and more money.
If the same thing happened, but it was advertising for The Bellagio, do you really think that many people are gonna fly to Vegas and go to The Bellagio and lose enough money to make sponsoring that player worth it?
I would just think that for caisnos, there's almost no way for the advertising to generate enough income to make it worthwhile.
#10
Posted 15 July 2008 - 07:26 AM
#11
Posted 15 July 2008 - 07:51 AM
#12
Posted 15 July 2008 - 08:51 AM
There were only two problems - 1 he wasn't there that often since he was traveling for big tourneys and such.
And - as with DN at Wynn - he got bored of the small stakes and didn't play "seriously". Sure it's probably +EV to sit with DN at the table when he's blind shoving every hand at 1/3 NL but it's not the same as taking a hand off of him when he's playing for real.
#13
Posted 15 July 2008 - 09:10 AM
_____ That's what she said!
#14
Posted 15 July 2008 - 09:12 AM
The thought of seeing that movie never even occurred to me tbh.
#15
Posted 15 July 2008 - 09:51 AM
The thought of seeing that movie never even occurred to me tbh.
I'm a trendsetter apparently.
And you don't have kids.
#17
Posted 15 July 2008 - 10:46 AM
f that, i want to know more about kung fu panda
#18
Posted 15 July 2008 - 11:13 AM
#19
Posted 15 July 2008 - 01:43 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









