Jump to content


qq (weak?) [poker stars 1/2]


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 Absolute

Absolute

    The Greatest

  • Members
  • 3,459 posts

Posted 10 May 2005 - 03:33 AM

PokerStars 1/2 Hold'em (10 handed) converterPreflop: DirkDiggler is MP3 with [Qh], [Qc]. 5 folds, BB calls.Flop: (6.50 SB) [Jc], [5h], [4s] (3 players)BB checks, DirkDiggler checks, Button bets, Button calls, BB calls.Turn: (6.25 BB) [Jd] (3 players)BB checks, DirkDiggler bets, BB folds, DirkDiggler calls.River: (10.25 BB) [Td] (2 players)DirkDiggler checks, Button bets, DirkDiggler calls.Final Pot: 12.25 BB
i saw him at the riverbank. he was breaking bread and giving thanks. with crosses made of pipes and planks. leaned up against the nitrous tanks.
he said take a hit. hold your breath and i'll dunk your head. then when you wake up, you'll be high as hell and born again.

- The Hold Steady

#2 Rocketwadster

Rocketwadster

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 3,816 posts
  • Location:Cambridge, Ontario
  • Interests:Gambling, Sports

Posted 10 May 2005 - 04:14 AM

You didn't play this weak by any means, you played it just as you should, based on the cards that arose. Once that button raises on the second jack, you have to shut down more often than not and just check/call it through. :wink:

#3 amarillotg

amarillotg

    fish out of water

  • Members
  • 1,136 posts
  • Location:a little town called none of your god damn business

Posted 10 May 2005 - 04:21 AM

why are u check raising this flop? your either pricing them in or giving them a free card to improve. i think you should of bet out on that flop and protected your hand.

#4 Absolute

Absolute

    The Greatest

  • Members
  • 3,459 posts

Posted 10 May 2005 - 04:27 AM

You are right. I don't know why I C/R there.....i actually don't believe it was intentionali was 4-tablingbut yeah, you are absolutely correct
i saw him at the riverbank. he was breaking bread and giving thanks. with crosses made of pipes and planks. leaned up against the nitrous tanks.
he said take a hit. hold your breath and i'll dunk your head. then when you wake up, you'll be high as hell and born again.

- The Hold Steady

#5 dms26

dms26

    Poker Forum God

  • Members
  • 21,877 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 May 2005 - 07:32 AM

I don't see anything weak about the hand, three betting there would only be good against a total maniac.
QUOTE (CozMyn @ Sunday, March 8th, 2009, 5:54 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
i tried to talk here about that program, the RNG , not to talk about when to accept all in without to see flop.
You can accept all in whenever you want, or whenever you feel lucky, but in virtual room's is not like in reality. In reality anything is possible... in virtual rooms you can be "the one" who knows the future, or who can change the future.

#6 amarillotg

amarillotg

    fish out of water

  • Members
  • 1,136 posts
  • Location:a little town called none of your god damn business

Posted 10 May 2005 - 08:41 AM

dms26 said:

I don't see anything weak about the hand, three betting there would only be good against a total maniac.
it may not be weak but it is played improperly as the OP realizes.

#7 DCWildcat

DCWildcat

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,691 posts
  • Location:Kentucky

Posted 10 May 2005 - 09:10 AM

I think I smell a KJ.

#8 dms26

dms26

    Poker Forum God

  • Members
  • 21,877 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 May 2005 - 09:15 AM

amarillotg said:

dms26 said:

I don't see anything weak about the hand, three betting there would only be good against a total maniac.
it may not be weak but it is played improperly as the OP realizes.
I thought his main question was about the turn raise, not his check/raise on the flop? Maybe he's asking about both though, and I agree with you I don't like check/raising the flop.
QUOTE (CozMyn @ Sunday, March 8th, 2009, 5:54 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
i tried to talk here about that program, the RNG , not to talk about when to accept all in without to see flop.
You can accept all in whenever you want, or whenever you feel lucky, but in virtual room's is not like in reality. In reality anything is possible... in virtual rooms you can be "the one" who knows the future, or who can change the future.

#9 KDawgCometh

KDawgCometh

    old skool

  • Moderators
  • 15,163 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:the bebop
  • Interests:poker(duh), soccer, football, rugby, music, and film

Posted 10 May 2005 - 09:39 AM

FPS WARNING, FPS WARNING. Awful flop CR, IMO. Bet it out and you might get in a threebet. Serously, when you have this hand why on earth are you running the risk of it getting checked through.
Wine Notes for those that care about such pretentious things

#10 looshle

looshle

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,236 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Connecticut

Posted 10 May 2005 - 10:04 AM

Yea I think you're smart enough to know to bet the flop so it prob was a misclick, but I really don't see any reason to call the turn raise.

#11 dms26

dms26

    Poker Forum God

  • Members
  • 21,877 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 May 2005 - 10:15 AM

looshle said:

Yea I think you're smart enough to know to bet the flop so it prob was a misclick, but I really don't see any reason to call the turn raise.
Depends on the player raising, he's getting 9 to 1 on his call.
QUOTE (CozMyn @ Sunday, March 8th, 2009, 5:54 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
i tried to talk here about that program, the RNG , not to talk about when to accept all in without to see flop.
You can accept all in whenever you want, or whenever you feel lucky, but in virtual room's is not like in reality. In reality anything is possible... in virtual rooms you can be "the one" who knows the future, or who can change the future.

#12 looshle

looshle

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,236 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Connecticut

Posted 10 May 2005 - 10:22 AM

Yea 9-1 here but he's also gotta pay another big bet on the river as well. Our hero raise preflop, check raised the flop and bet out the turn. The button is not raising here with less than a pair of queens. We're beat, we know we're beat, and anything after this is just chip spewing.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users