5/10 Nlhe (live At The Borgata)
Started by CaneBrain, Jun 23 2008 12:13 PM
14 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 23 June 2008 - 12:13 PM
Hero is in the cutoff ($1350) with two red Queens.
MP 2 ($900)---just sat down no reads
SB ($2500)----seems to be a very good player. Tight but aggressive when in a pot. Just doubled up by cagily slowplaying a flopped flush.
Folds to MP2 who makes standard raise to $35. Folds to hero who makes it $110 to go. SB flat calls. MP 1 calls.
Flop is 10/6/6 rainbow.
SB checks, MP2 checks, Hero bets $220, SB calls, MP2 calls.
Turn: 10/6/6/3 (completing the full rainbow)
SB checks, MP2 checks, Hero ???
I felt like I might be getting slowplayed by pocket 10s. Could SB possibly have 76 sooted or something? fwiw, I put MP2 on JJ but I had no clue where SB could possibly be.
MP 2 ($900)---just sat down no reads
SB ($2500)----seems to be a very good player. Tight but aggressive when in a pot. Just doubled up by cagily slowplaying a flopped flush.
Folds to MP2 who makes standard raise to $35. Folds to hero who makes it $110 to go. SB flat calls. MP 1 calls.
Flop is 10/6/6 rainbow.
SB checks, MP2 checks, Hero bets $220, SB calls, MP2 calls.
Turn: 10/6/6/3 (completing the full rainbow)
SB checks, MP2 checks, Hero ???
I felt like I might be getting slowplayed by pocket 10s. Could SB possibly have 76 sooted or something? fwiw, I put MP2 on JJ but I had no clue where SB could possibly be.
"Give a little bit.....give a little bit of your chips to me...."
#2
Posted 23 June 2008 - 12:32 PM
I think I check behind here for 2 reasons.
1) Pot control.
2) You'll get the same information as to whether your hand is good and you get to see the river as well. If they have you beat, you'll know by the time it gets to you on the river.
I'm very curious how others would play this.
1) Pot control.
2) You'll get the same information as to whether your hand is good and you get to see the river as well. If they have you beat, you'll know by the time it gets to you on the river.
I'm very curious how others would play this.
#3
Posted 23 June 2008 - 12:33 PM
You're really praying the SB has A-T or JJ here... I think it's ok to slow it down on this turn, considering his flat from the SB of a three bet, and then call on the flop here really reeks of AA, KK, or TT
QUOTE (NoBBiR @ Monday, August 11th, 2008, 7:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If god didn't want that particular law broken, he had no business making those that big.
Climb
Support your underground artists damnit
#4
Posted 23 June 2008 - 12:42 PM
QUOTE (fakepoo @ Monday, June 23rd, 2008, 12:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I think I check behind here for 2 reasons.
1) Pot control.
2) You'll get the same information as to whether your hand is good and you get to see the river as well. If they have you beat, you'll know by the time it gets to you on the river.
I'm very curious how others would play this.
1) Pot control.
2) You'll get the same information as to whether your hand is good and you get to see the river as well. If they have you beat, you'll know by the time it gets to you on the river.
I'm very curious how others would play this.
My first impulse is to check behind, too.
But then I think that two villains called a reraise AND our flop bet. Why?
Obv that the whole table isn't sitting on AK.
Problem is our check can open the door for a move on the river.
I think we're going broke sooner or later in this hand.
Somewhere Jimmy Carter is smiling because he knows that he is no longer the worst President of the modern era
#5
Posted 23 June 2008 - 12:50 PM
even days later I am not sure what I should have done here....thanks for the input peoples.
I will post the results tonight or something. It was one of the more interesting hands I have ever played.
I will post the results tonight or something. It was one of the more interesting hands I have ever played.
"Give a little bit.....give a little bit of your chips to me...."
#6
Posted 23 June 2008 - 02:44 PM
When MP2 overcalls the flop, he's almost always got TT or 6x here. I would check it back and probably fold to most river bets.
#7
Posted 23 June 2008 - 05:53 PM
OK everyone agrees this pattern is spooky as hell.
I decided to check behind on the turn.
The river was an A. SB checks, MP2 checks. Easy decision to check again right? So I did.
Results:
SB shows JJ. MP2 shows QQ. I show QQ. MP2 and I split the pot.
I decided to check behind on the turn.
The river was an A. SB checks, MP2 checks. Easy decision to check again right? So I did.
Results:
SB shows JJ. MP2 shows QQ. I show QQ. MP2 and I split the pot.
"Give a little bit.....give a little bit of your chips to me...."
#8
Posted 23 June 2008 - 06:02 PM
nice, crazy hand
#9
Posted 24 June 2008 - 06:04 AM
QUOTE (No_Neck @ Monday, June 23rd, 2008, 6:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
nice, crazy hand
I was very surprised and very pleased to make a profit on this hand. Was very strange.
"Give a little bit.....give a little bit of your chips to me...."
#10
Posted 24 June 2008 - 08:13 AM
check turn imo. two calls on a paired board wud scare me. I don't think you get alot of value out of a 10 fwiw either. With position, makes river play easier.
Mike Matusow: want to play some o 8
Mike Matusow: 5001k
Ram Vaswani: you to good at 500 1k but i play you 1k 2k
Mike Matusow: 5001k
Ram Vaswani: you to good at 500 1k but i play you 1k 2k
#11
Posted 24 June 2008 - 08:13 PM
Cold-calls of 3-bets in NLHE are almost always QQ/JJ/TT.
I am really happy to enter in this site. Poker is one of the online gaming. It is very talented game. In poker game so many persons play with betting. It is almost gambling. It has so many types. Family members also play for fun with this game. We're all new players and we cannot play at 4 tables at once! It's incredible.
#12
Posted 25 June 2008 - 08:54 AM
QUOTE (CobaltBlue @ Wednesday, June 25th, 2008, 12:13 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Cold-calls of 3-bets in NLHE are almost always QQ/JJ/TT.
You don't think AK or AQs can call a 3-bet? I think you're assigning too tight a range.
QUOTE (Ninja Ace @ Wednesday, March 24th, 2010, 2:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Flops are kind of like vagina's. The wetter they are, the harder you hit them.
#13
Posted 25 June 2008 - 10:30 AM
People are more likely to coldcall 3 bets with hands like 99-QQ than they are with AQ/AK simply becuase most people in these spots will shove AK and fold AQ.
Also, live players SUCK and coldcall 3 bets with crap that they never should call with.
Also, live players SUCK and coldcall 3 bets with crap that they never should call with.
#14
Posted 25 June 2008 - 11:57 AM
QUOTE (SwolyswoND @ Wednesday, June 25th, 2008, 11:54 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
You don't think AK or AQs can call a 3-bet? I think you're assigning too tight a range.
They do sometimes...more likely in Limit though.
Seriously...I bet if you went through someone's FR NLHE database and looked for every instance of a 3-bet cold-call, 90% of the time, the range is QQ/JJ/TT.
I am really happy to enter in this site. Poker is one of the online gaming. It is very talented game. In poker game so many persons play with betting. It is almost gambling. It has so many types. Family members also play for fun with this game. We're all new players and we cannot play at 4 tables at once! It's incredible.
#15
Posted 25 June 2008 - 12:09 PM
QUOTE (CobaltBlue @ Wednesday, June 25th, 2008, 11:57 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
They do sometimes...more likely in Limit though.
Seriously...I bet if you went through someone's FR NLHE database and looked for every instance of a 3-bet cold-call, 90% of the time, the range is QQ/JJ/TT.
Seriously...I bet if you went through someone's FR NLHE database and looked for every instance of a 3-bet cold-call, 90% of the time, the range is QQ/JJ/TT.
I agree although Acid's comment that live players are more likely to cold-call a 3-bet with something dumb.
What you really mean is a 3 bet cold call SHOULD mean TT--QQ but in reality I have seen people do it with AJ, AQ, AK, and even 66--99 a number of times. Live only. I see lots of wacky stuff live.....I dont see too many strange plays online anymore. Sadly.
"Give a little bit.....give a little bit of your chips to me...."
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










