Jump to content


played correctly?


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 bampote

bampote

    Poker Forum Regular

  • Members
  • 161 posts
  • Location:Ann Arbor, MI
  • Interests:music, literature, politics

Posted 09 May 2005 - 09:53 PM

This hand came up just as I was about to leave the table. The player on my left had just shown up, and the player to his left was a maniac, raising and reraising with no pair, no draw.Party Poker 1/2 Hold'em (10 handed) converterPreflop: bampote is UTG with [Ac], [As]. bampote raises, UTG+1 =#A500AF(No read)/ calls, UTG+2 =#A500AF(Maniac)/ calls.Flop: (13.50 SB) [8h], [6c], [5s] (3 players)bampote bets, bampote calls, No read calls.The cap here makes me think that he could have a set, so I decide to slow down. No idea what the in between guy has.Turn: (12.75 BB) [Kh] (3 players)bampote checks, No read checks, Maniac bets, bampote calls, No read calls.Still thinking a set...was I giving him too much credit not to bet this?River: (15.75 BB) [9h] (3 players)bampote checks, No read checks, Maniac checks.Now there's 3 to a flush, so I check it down. When I see the maniac check, I'm pretty sure I've got the best hand (not that it matters... results are below if you want to see if I was right). Should I have bet this river?Final Pot: 15.75 BBResults in white below: bampote has Ac As (one pair, aces). No read has 7h Ah (flush, ace high). Maniac has Td Th (one pair, tens). Outcome: No read wins 15.75 BB.

#2 Vade

Vade

    Forum Shopkeeper

  • Members
  • 3,864 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee, WI
  • Interests:Poker, Sports, Movies

Posted 09 May 2005 - 09:57 PM

I'm putting in one more raise on the turn, then going into check/call mode.Otherwise NH
Last night I stayed up late playing poker with Tarot cards. I got a full house and four people died.

#3 Swift_Psycho

Swift_Psycho

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 4,889 posts

Posted 09 May 2005 - 09:58 PM

Lead out on the turn and then slow down if raised yet again. Check/call the river with a 4-card straight and 3-card flush out there.

#4

  • Guests

Posted 09 May 2005 - 11:15 PM

Swift_Psycho said:

Lead out on the turn and then slow down if raised yet again.  Check/call the river with a 4-card straight and 3-card flush out there.
With that flop, I put the No Read on either a straight draw with a 7 and/or a pair of 8's (a hand like 78 has you in trouble.) Thinking the maniac has a set is giving him WAY too much credit here. He's a maniac for a reason, he bets and raising with little to nothing.You know the maniac is going to bet the turn so I would go for a check/raise here. The K hitting the turn only helps the case that you're ahead and making it 2 cold to No Read which makes it that much harder for him to come along to the river knowing the maniac is likely to 3-bet and you possibly cap it. I think he's drawing and it takes a huge draw to take that much heat (and weak players will sometimes even fold these huge draws too)This is a case of you wanting to protect your hand. You are VERY likely (I'd say 75% or more) to have a better hand than the maniac so you want to isolate him if you can. Based on how passive No Read is, it's clear to me he's drawing, and making it two cold to him may get him to incorrectly fold a straight or flush draw. (The odds he's getting is enough to call, but there is no way he's folding if you trap him for one bet by leading out and the maniac raises, you 3-betting MIGHT get him to fold though)The river card is the horror card for you. All the draws that were present just completed. Even the maniac might have a random 7 so check/call is the best plan of attack.Yikes, just looked at the results. The No Read having both the flush and straight draws means there is no way you can get him to fold so you were destined to lose this hand unfortunately.I still think the check/raise is best though as it gives you the best chance of folding No Read. Take a look at this thread from wrto (with my VERY detailed response on the second page for full reasoning)http://www.fullconta...2317&highlight=Waiting for the turn to check/raise is the best way to protect big hands in this situation with a maniac in the pot you're pretty sure you're beat so you want to isolate him. Only calling on the flop and check/raising the turn minimizes the odds anyone else is getting to see the river which yields the best chance of getting them to fold. (In this case it would yield only 6-1 odds to call for No Read as opposed to 9-1 with my reccomendation.)Zara

#5 HoosierAlum

HoosierAlum

    Grindmode

  • Members
  • 8,169 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago
  • Interests:Golf, Traveling, Baseball, Basketball

Posted 10 May 2005 - 01:13 AM

I also raise the turn. Kinda forced to check/call the river. Open ended straight got there, as did the backdoor flush. You have to check call considering you are first to act here.

#6 RISEorFall

RISEorFall

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 2,984 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:I'm bad, I'm nationwide
  • Favorite Poker Game:HU freezeout 4 souls

Posted 10 May 2005 - 01:36 AM

AA against a maniac, I'd bet and raise as you're ahead way more often than not. the only thing that worries me is the others in the hand. Staying aggressive may knock them out leaving you heads up. If they stay, slow down. I might just check/call the river b/c it's too easy for maniac to have accidentally hit a draw, but I still might keep firing, just depends on my feel of the hand. Stay aggressive on the turn, tho.

#7 KDawgCometh

KDawgCometh

    old skool

  • Moderators
  • 15,163 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:the bebop
  • Interests:poker(duh), soccer, football, rugby, music, and film

Posted 10 May 2005 - 09:23 AM

cr that turn, get this hand HU against the maniac. There are draws out on the board, and the guy in between has been real passive here, so ou need to cut his odds down real fast. You're also giving way too much credit to the maniac
Wine Notes for those that care about such pretentious things

#8 cdddc75

cdddc75

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,780 posts
  • Location:Portland

Posted 10 May 2005 - 09:32 AM

KDawgCometh said:

cr that turn, get this hand HU against the maniac. There are draws out on the board, and the guy in between has been real passive here, so ou need to cut his odds down real fast. You're also giving way too much credit to the maniac
Exactly.It wouldn't have worked in this case since No Read had OESD + nut flush draw, but c/r the turn would help isolate against a passive player with one of those draws.I'll go a step further and suggest that you may have been better off by just calling the flop raise so that a turn c/r would better protect your hand.Check/call the river.

#9 bampote

bampote

    Poker Forum Regular

  • Members
  • 161 posts
  • Location:Ann Arbor, MI
  • Interests:music, literature, politics

Posted 10 May 2005 - 11:39 AM

First of all, I want to thank everyone for the advice. I can definitely see where the C/R on the turn would have been the strongest move. Also, I had the intention of calling on the river if it had been bet (although thank God it wasn't, or it probably would have cost me another 2 BB when No Read C/red it.) However, I'm a little curious about this advice:

cdddc75 said:

I'll go a step further and suggest that you may have been better off by just calling the flop raise so that a turn c/r would better protect your hand.
Now, when I capped it pre-flop, I was hoping to knock out No Read and get it heads up against the maniac. I figured he would definitely call one more bet, but two more might get him out. Is that totally off base?




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users