This hand came up just as I was about to leave the table. The player on my left had just shown up, and the player to his left was a maniac, raising and reraising with no pair, no draw.Party Poker 1/2 Hold'em (10 handed) converterPreflop: bampote is UTG with [Ac], [As]. bampote raises, UTG+1 =#A500AF(No read)/ calls, UTG+2 =#A500AF(Maniac)/ calls.Flop: (13.50 SB) [8h], [6c], [5s] (3 players)bampote bets, bampote calls, No read calls.The cap here makes me think that he could have a set, so I decide to slow down. No idea what the in between guy has.Turn: (12.75 BB) [Kh] (3 players)bampote checks, No read checks, Maniac bets, bampote calls, No read calls.Still thinking a set...was I giving him too much credit not to bet this?River: (15.75 BB) [9h] (3 players)bampote checks, No read checks, Maniac checks.Now there's 3 to a flush, so I check it down. When I see the maniac check, I'm pretty sure I've got the best hand (not that it matters... results are below if you want to see if I was right). Should I have bet this river?Final Pot: 15.75 BBResults in white below: bampote has Ac As (one pair, aces). No read has 7h Ah (flush, ace high). Maniac has Td Th (one pair, tens). Outcome: No read wins 15.75 BB.
played correctly?
Started by bampote, May 09 2005 09:53 PM
8 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 09 May 2005 - 09:53 PM
#2
Posted 09 May 2005 - 09:57 PM
I'm putting in one more raise on the turn, then going into check/call mode.Otherwise NH
Last night I stayed up late playing poker with Tarot cards. I got a full house and four people died.
#3
Posted 09 May 2005 - 09:58 PM
Lead out on the turn and then slow down if raised yet again. Check/call the river with a 4-card straight and 3-card flush out there.
#4
Posted 09 May 2005 - 11:15 PM
Swift_Psycho said:
Lead out on the turn and then slow down if raised yet again. Check/call the river with a 4-card straight and 3-card flush out there.
#5
Posted 10 May 2005 - 01:13 AM
I also raise the turn. Kinda forced to check/call the river. Open ended straight got there, as did the backdoor flush. You have to check call considering you are first to act here.
#6
Posted 10 May 2005 - 01:36 AM
AA against a maniac, I'd bet and raise as you're ahead way more often than not. the only thing that worries me is the others in the hand. Staying aggressive may knock them out leaving you heads up. If they stay, slow down. I might just check/call the river b/c it's too easy for maniac to have accidentally hit a draw, but I still might keep firing, just depends on my feel of the hand. Stay aggressive on the turn, tho.
#7
Posted 10 May 2005 - 09:23 AM
cr that turn, get this hand HU against the maniac. There are draws out on the board, and the guy in between has been real passive here, so ou need to cut his odds down real fast. You're also giving way too much credit to the maniac
Wine Notes for those that care about such pretentious things
#8
Posted 10 May 2005 - 09:32 AM
KDawgCometh said:
cr that turn, get this hand HU against the maniac. There are draws out on the board, and the guy in between has been real passive here, so ou need to cut his odds down real fast. You're also giving way too much credit to the maniac
#9
Posted 10 May 2005 - 11:39 AM
First of all, I want to thank everyone for the advice. I can definitely see where the C/R on the turn would have been the strongest move. Also, I had the intention of calling on the river if it had been bet (although thank God it wasn't, or it probably would have cost me another 2 BB when No Read C/red it.) However, I'm a little curious about this advice:Now, when I capped it pre-flop, I was hoping to knock out No Read and get it heads up against the maniac. I figured he would definitely call one more bet, but two more might get him out. Is that totally off base?
cdddc75 said:
I'll go a step further and suggest that you may have been better off by just calling the flop raise so that a turn c/r would better protect your hand.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









