3 limper rule
Started by amarillotg, May 09 2005 07:51 AM
12 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 09 May 2005 - 07:51 AM
i remember reading in championship limit HE by TJ and McEvoy that McEvoy said that if 3 people limped in front of him he would limp in to with a wide variety of marginal hands. (suited connectors and what not)so in theory you could come into the pot from MP1 with 56s. (assuming UTG, +1, +2 all limped)does anyone employ this? it seems like a good play that i haven't really been using.
#2
Posted 09 May 2005 - 07:57 AM
With that many limpers in front of you, you're getting great odds to call here and see a flop especially if the table is passive preflop. But if you have maniacs behind you that raise and reraise with anything it could get expensive. I'd rather have late position but if it's not a crazy table I'd limp there with suited connectors.
QUOTE (CozMyn @ Sunday, March 8th, 2009, 5:54 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
i tried to talk here about that program, the RNG , not to talk about when to accept all in without to see flop.
You can accept all in whenever you want, or whenever you feel lucky, but in virtual room's is not like in reality. In reality anything is possible... in virtual rooms you can be "the one" who knows the future, or who can change the future.
You can accept all in whenever you want, or whenever you feel lucky, but in virtual room's is not like in reality. In reality anything is possible... in virtual rooms you can be "the one" who knows the future, or who can change the future.
#3
Posted 09 May 2005 - 07:57 AM
yes, i would do it with two limpers in front of me in middle position. Generally speaking this means you are going to have a ton of people in the pot and a couple cards that play well against a bunch of people.
#4
Posted 09 May 2005 - 07:58 AM
You need to get out of the habit that you need so many callers to make calling correct. You don't need pot odds preflop in SSHE because there are so many errors made.65s is still a fold for me because you have bad relative position unless the button raises.
back for kramit
#6
Posted 09 May 2005 - 08:21 AM
wrto4556 said:
this is so valuable its not funny. Ed Miller just lays it out and really gets to the crux of Limit Poker ingeneral. This logic applies to all levels of limit hldem as it is about beingabout to make better decisions than your opponenet
Wine Notes for those that care about such pretentious things
#7
Posted 09 May 2005 - 08:21 AM
Thanks for the link. its a good read.
#8
Posted 09 May 2005 - 11:04 AM
Yeah I was checking old "favorite" threads about a month ago and came across that article its one of way too many 2+2 threads favorited.
"Here are my rules: what can be done with one substance must never be done with another. No two materials are alike. No two sites on earth are alike. No two buildings have the same purpose. The purpose, the site, the material determine the shape. Nothing can be reasonable or beautiful unless its made by one central idea, and the idea sets every detail. A building is alive, like a man." - The Fountainhead.
#9
Posted 09 May 2005 - 11:07 AM
What other ones are favorited?
#10
Posted 09 May 2005 - 11:34 AM
guinevar said:
What other ones are favorited?
Wine Notes for those that care about such pretentious things
#11
Posted 09 May 2005 - 11:42 AM
Clarkmeister is my God. I wish he posted more...
back for kramit
#12
Posted 09 May 2005 - 12:02 PM
I'm not registered at 2+2, is there a way I can search for clarkmeister without registering?
#13
Posted 10 May 2005 - 02:38 PM
If they are limping and tight, push em.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









