Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In response to the recent blog--while I agree this may be blown out of proportion, it's definitely annoying to most women to be referred to as "sweetie" or something similar in a professional setting. It's a little overly familiar and slightly condescending. It's not endearing unless it's said by your beloved. Even then, it loses some of its allure when a brazillion strangers have called you the same thing all day long. And chivalry would demand something more along the lines of "miss" or "ma'am".I'll make an exception for people over 75 years old though...just seems to come with the territory there.So to summarize:[x] grating, not endearing[x] kind of patronizing[ ] good reason to not vote for someone for Presidentalso[x] Going from long-time lurker straight to the new topic button makes me a jerk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just saw the Bush speach about appeasment and Hitler, just wow. This guy is insane. I lean towards the right(at least what the right used to stand for, fiscal responsiblity, tough on crime,etc) but this guy is a terrible president and a horrible human being. The world will be a better place in 7 months.

Link to post
Share on other sites
[x] Going from long-time lurker straight to the new topic button makes me a jerk.
While annoying boxes don't exactly make you a jerk, it does kind of make you look like a sweetie. If it makes you feel any better, someone's kicking themselves for not thinking of making a joke account using the FAQ name.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I worked as a journalist for a number of years. I've dealt with a lot of BS, but usually, if I had a problem with how I was treated by a source, I would deal with it directly. As for the sweetie comment, I think it shows that Obama is probably just a bit too friendly with members of the media. I got on well with a number of people I dealt with on a weekly basis. But I always knew if the time came, and my source screwed up, I would offer them all the space in print I could to defend themselves, but I would never offer them mercy or protection.It's a very small mistake and one he probably won't repeat.I do get how it could make a female reporter feel less respected or valued. If I was her, I'd just tell him flat out that her name is X, and that's what she'd prefer to be called.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I just saw the Bush speach about appeasment and Hitler, just wow. This guy is insane. I lean towards the right(at least what the right used to stand for, fiscal responsiblity, tough on crime,etc) but this guy is a terrible president and a horrible human being. The world will be a better place in 7 months.
Historically he is right. Don't pay attention to that though, this brand of extremeist is perfectly reasonable. The thing is, I saw this to, and you know what I thought? I thought, "Wow, here is a complete id making the dems look absolutely retarded, without once mentioning names." Pretty good for an id.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Historically he is right. Don't pay attention to that though, this brand of extremeist is perfectly reasonable. The thing is, I saw this to, and you know what I thought? I thought, "Wow, here is a complete id making the dems look absolutely retarded, without once mentioning names." Pretty good for an id.
I like to think he actually did not mean it what so ever. Using the Israeli parliament celebrating their 60th year anniversary referring to nazis as a platform for domestic politics is just horrible and I do not think, even that disgusting puppet would do it.
Link to post
Share on other sites
I like to think he actually did not mean it what so ever. Using the Israeli parliament celebrating their 60th year anniversary referring to nazis as a platform for domestic politics is just horrible and I do not think, even that disgusting puppet would do it.
Not one thing he said was not true, and it was perfectly timed, in that it got peoples attention- like leaders do.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just going to hope he had enough respect to not do it.Just like American Idol I've given up on American Politics. You all already have your mind made up before you hear the issue. If you are left you are left, if you are right you are right. In Ireland our parties are not so drastically different than in America so its different I guess but its so sad that the issue is barely important, just who caused it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm just going to hope he had enough respect to not do it.Just like American Idol I've given up on American Politics. You all already have your mind made up before you hear the issue. If you are left you are left, if you are right you are right. In Ireland our parties are not so drastically different than in America so its different I guess but its so sad that the issue is barely important, just who caused it.
This is so not true. I hear both sides of pretty much every issue, the problem is that in this country we allow two very different types of thinking to battle it out, and you don't get it because they ARE so different. It's awesome, it really is, and a major reason why it goes something like this: U.S...............................................and then everybody else. It's the one thing the two parties USED to be able to agree on. No longer, the left is to busy worrying about countries liking us, and the right is (rightly) saying,"**** it, when did we ever need approval to be free?"
Link to post
Share on other sites
This is so not true. I hear both sides of pretty much every issue, the problem is that in this country we allow two very different types of thinking to battle it out, and you don't get it because they ARE so different. It's awesome, it really is, and a major reason why it goes something like this: U.S...............................................and then everybody else. It's the one thing the two parties USED to be able to agree on. No longer, the left is to busy worrying about countries liking us, and the right is (rightly) saying,"**** it, when did we ever need approval to be free?"
loland lol
Link to post
Share on other sites
loland lol
You may have misunderstood. Read it again. If lol is still the response, then I will have to conclude that I am right, and lol is just your way of filling in the mental silence.
Link to post
Share on other sites
You may have misunderstood. Read it again. If lol is still the response, then I will have to conclude that I am right, and lol is just your way of filling in the mental silence.
I honestly don't believe you are not biased. Sorry but when you claimed that Dinosaurs may not have existed and argued pretty avidly about it..well you know.So instead of engaging in a pointless arguement where we would never agree,oops, I said lol to the two really really funny statements in your post.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know why anyone would be surprised that a democrat presidential nominee would think of a woman as an object.sweetie.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't know why anyone would be surprised that a democrat presidential nominee would think of a woman as an object.sweetie.
True. The republican side reserves the "sweetie" comment for their gay escorts and randoms they meet in a minneapolis bathroom.
Link to post
Share on other sites
True. The republican side reserves the "sweetie" comment for their gay escorts and randoms they meet in a minneapolis bathroom.
There's no such thing as a gay Republican, everyone knows that :club:
Link to post
Share on other sites
True. The republican side reserves the "sweetie" comment for their gay escorts and randoms they meet in a minneapolis bathroom.
Exactly, which is where the title belongs.Not on a woman that had to fight and prove herself every step of the way, and finally reach the near peak of her profession and be then be degraded to the level of the cocktail waitress at a strip club just because she has breastes!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Daniel, I have to wonder if you'd feel the same way if instead the reporter had called Obama "boy". The fact that it doesn't bother you is not a reason to wave it away.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Daniel, I have to wonder if you'd feel the same way if instead the reporter had called Obama "boy". The fact that it doesn't bother you is not a reason to wave it away.
As long as you don't mention his middle name... :club: Hussein :ts
Link to post
Share on other sites
I honestly don't believe you are not biased. Sorry but when you claimed that Dinosaurs may not have existed and argued pretty avidly about it..well you know.So instead of engaging in a pointless arguement where we would never agree,oops, I said lol to the two really really funny statements in your post.
No, I don't know. That's one of many discussions, and the one you chose to focus on is the most ridiculous and the most fun, but it serves it's purpose. You should continue focusing on one conversation I had, though, it really shows your colors in the bias argument.
Link to post
Share on other sites

KLW's question crossed my mind immediately. Isn't that a double standard? And FAQ is exactly right -- kind of grating, not a huge crime, but not nearly as charming as some guys seem to think it is, either.I'm still on the Obama bandwagon, but his supporters and their vitriol against Hillary is not making it easy. One woman asked a reporter, "What message exactly is my nine-year-old daughter supposed to get from this primary campaign? That she can do anything she wants, or that she'll be called a cunt if she tries?"

Link to post
Share on other sites
One woman asked a reporter, "What message exactly is my nine-year-old daughter supposed to get from this primary campaign? That she can do anything she wants, or that she'll be called a **** if she tries?"
It is a coin flip.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...