I Dont Understand Things
#1
Posted 10 May 2008 - 06:34 PM
#2
Posted 10 May 2008 - 06:38 PM
#3
Posted 10 May 2008 - 06:42 PM
i know the REAL RodReynolds, and you, sir, will never be anything more than a cheap, inexpensive, thrifty version of he.
good day.
#4
Posted 10 May 2008 - 06:46 PM
I dont understand three way calling. I mean seriously, just how in the hell does that work?
#5
Posted 10 May 2008 - 06:46 PM
good day.
The "REAL" RodReynolds was but a precursor to me. Rod_Reynolds with a space in his name, a poster who is about to change the landscape of this forum and make RodReynolds seem like a faint star when compared to me, a supernova. BOOOMM <---- the sound a supernova makes.
#6
Posted 10 May 2008 - 06:50 PM
LOL at you writing "BOOOMM" and describing it as "the sound a supernova makes."
I am laughing at you. OUT LOUD.
#7
Posted 10 May 2008 - 06:53 PM
And so, I dont understand why they didnt make them that way to begin with. They wanted us to have health problems? Fuck that.
#8
Posted 10 May 2008 - 07:09 PM
And so, I dont understand why they didnt make them that way to begin with. They wanted us to have health problems? Fuck that.
#9
Posted 10 May 2008 - 07:10 PM
And so, I dont understand why they didnt make them that way to begin with. They wanted us to have health problems? Fuck that.
It's a bonus so you put up with the anal leakage.

Johnny Chan shaking hands with a legend.
http://www.facebook.com/thomas.dyer1
gatortom64: too bad I folded my 46, I woulda banked
gatortom64: but I am no Harrison Gimbel
#10
Posted 10 May 2008 - 08:22 PM
Well, things start out very far away a long time ago, and then they come together, things happen, and then they go away forever.
#11
Posted 10 May 2008 - 08:58 PM
Good. But I need you, to, to, go deeper.
#12
Posted 11 May 2008 - 04:35 AM

Baller
#13
Posted 11 May 2008 - 04:37 AM
Especially in a metaphysical context, World may refer to everything that constitutes reality and the Universe: see World (philosophy).
[edit] Universe
Main article: UniverseThe Universe is most commonly defined as everything that physically exists: the entirety of space and time, all forms of matter, energy and momentum, and the physical laws and constants that govern them. However, the term "universe" may be used in slightly different contextual senses, denoting such concepts as the cosmos, the world or Nature.
Experiments suggest that the universe has been governed by the same physical laws and constants throughout its extent and history. The dominant force at cosmological distances is gravity, and general relativity is currently the most accurate theory of gravitation. The remaining three fundamental forces and the particles on which they act are described by the Standard Model. The universe has at least three dimensions of space and one of time, although extremely small additional dimensions cannot be ruled out experimentally. Spacetime appears to be smoothly and simply connected, and space has very small mean curvature, so that Euclidean geometry is accurate on the average throughout the universe.
According to some speculations, this universe may be one of many disconnected universes, which are collectively denoted as the multiverse. In one theory, there is an infinite variety of universes, each with different physical constants. In another theory, new universes are spawned with every quantum measurement. By definition, these speculations cannot currently be tested experimentally.
[edit] In theoretical physics
Main article: Theory of everythingIn theoretical physics, a theory of everything (TOE) is a hypothetical theory that fully explains and links together all known physical phenomena. Initially, the term was used with an ironic connotation to refer to various overgeneralized theories. For example, a great-grandfather of Ijon Tichy — a character from a cycle of Stanisław Lem's science fiction stories of 1960s — was known to work on the "General Theory of Everything". Over time, the term stuck in popularizations of quantum physics to describe a theory that would unify or explain through a single model the theories of all fundamental interactions of nature.
There have been many theories of everything proposed by theoretical physicists over the last century, but none have been confirmed experimentally. The primary problem in producing a TOE is that the accepted theories of quantum mechanics and general relativity are hard to combine.
Based on theoretical holographic principle arguments from the 1990s, many physicists believe that 11-dimensional M-theory, which is described in many sectors by matrix string theory, in many other sectors by perturbative string theory is the complete theory of everything. Other physicists disagree.
[edit] In philosophy
Main article: Theory of everything (philosophy)In philosophy, a theory of everything or TOE is an ultimate, all-encompassing explanation of nature or reality.[2][3][4] Adopting the term from physics, where the search for a theory of everything is ongoing, philosophers have discussed the viability of the concept and analyzed its properties and implications.[2][3][4] Among the questions to be addressed by a philosophical theory of everything are: "Why is reality understandable?" "Why are the laws of nature as they are?" "Why is there anything at all?"[2]

Baller
#14
Posted 11 May 2008 - 05:27 AM
"What you don't know would fill a warehouse"
2 of my favorite sayings..... my kids hate them.

"If it wasn't for luck I'd win every one" -- Phil Hellmuth
#15
Posted 12 May 2008 - 12:27 PM
"What you don't know would fill a warehouse"2 of my favorite sayings..... my kids hate them.
Watch how you say that, you could end up in the d*ckhead dad file with the wrong tone. Especially if youre saying it often.
#16
Posted 12 May 2008 - 12:37 PM
Oh, you were under the impression that he wasn't already in the file.
#17
Posted 12 May 2008 - 02:14 PM
Fortunately my family has a sense of humor.

"If it wasn't for luck I'd win every one" -- Phil Hellmuth
#18
Posted 12 May 2008 - 02:15 PM
Does it skip generations?
#19
Posted 12 May 2008 - 02:17 PM
Oooooo... you still being mean to me? Why for?
No... I have a sense of humor. Say something funny and you'll see.
Oh wait...... I get it now.

"If it wasn't for luck I'd win every one" -- Phil Hellmuth
#20
Posted 12 May 2008 - 02:59 PM
1. if i am 200% convinced that i am a lucky guy and i will win
2. if i have the cards in hand that i wish(diferent cases: AA; AK; ... etc)
3. if i have a so called PokerRNG program that can copy the original RNG
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









