Gus Vs David Chui
Started by dscoot, Apr 27 2008 07:26 PM
12 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 27 April 2008 - 07:26 PM
It seems to me like gus didnt change gears at all when he got heads up vs david chui with a 20m to 5m chip advantage. Chui seems to play a perfect style to combat the agressive bullys. Gus seemed to be winning all the small pots but losing all the big ones. Anyone go watch this? Im thinking this win might set off a big wsop for chui, and gus as well, for all you fantasy players.
#2
Posted 27 April 2008 - 07:28 PM
QUOTE (dscoot @ Sunday, April 27th, 2008, 10:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It seems to me like gus didnt change gears at all when he got heads up vs david chui with a 20m to 5m chip advantage. Chui seems to play a perfect style to combat the agressive bullys. Gus seemed to be winning all the small pots but losing all the big ones. Anyone go watch this? Im thinking this win might set off a big wsop for chui, and gus as well, for all you fantasy players.
http://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poker-foru...howtopic=121951
Good day.
freak2304 (Lawrence) on Stars and freak2304 on Tilt
#3
Posted 27 April 2008 - 07:29 PM
QUOTE (freak2304 @ Sunday, April 27th, 2008, 10:28 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
/thread
Well, I was gonna make a horrid "Chui" joke first....but I think I'll pass.
/thread for real this time
QUOTE (dscoot @ Friday, April 10th, 2009, 3:20 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
im still not sold that many of these people that get these big online scores are winners when it comes to the live game, which, by the way, is real poker.
#4
Posted 27 April 2008 - 07:31 PM
Didnt Gus get his money in good for essentially the tourney on the last hand? Plus what was the HU match 50 hands? Maybe Gus just kept missing the flop and Chiu hit everything. Hard to say how either of them was playing based on 50 hands is all im saying
What if the 'HOKEY POKEY' really IS what it's ALL about?
#5
Posted 27 April 2008 - 07:34 PM
QUOTE (cubsfan44 @ Sunday, April 27th, 2008, 11:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Didnt Gus get his money in good for essentially the tourney on the last hand? Plus what was the HU match 50 hands? Maybe Gus just kept missing the flop and Chiu hit everything. Hard to say how either of them was playing based on 50 hands is all im saying
Much agreed.
Snamuh raises to $76.75, and is all in
BigKamp: yyou lose
BigKamp has 15 seconds left to act
BigKamp calls $24.50, and is all in
Seat 1: BigKamp (small blind) mucked [Ad Ac] - a full house, Aces full of Kings
Seat 2: Snamuh (big blind) showed [Kd Kh] and won ($102.50) with four of a kind, Kings
Snamuh: you lose
BigKamp: yyou lose
BigKamp has 15 seconds left to act
BigKamp calls $24.50, and is all in
Seat 1: BigKamp (small blind) mucked [Ad Ac] - a full house, Aces full of Kings
Seat 2: Snamuh (big blind) showed [Kd Kh] and won ($102.50) with four of a kind, Kings
Snamuh: you lose
#6
Posted 27 April 2008 - 07:36 PM
QUOTE (Snamuh @ Sunday, April 27th, 2008, 10:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Much agreed.
Your too mellow with the downswing. Pls bust out of that ASAP.
QUOTE (dscoot @ Friday, April 10th, 2009, 3:20 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
im still not sold that many of these people that get these big online scores are winners when it comes to the live game, which, by the way, is real poker.
#7
Posted 27 April 2008 - 07:45 PM
QUOTE (freak2304 @ Sunday, April 27th, 2008, 7:28 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
that thread is more of an update thread and not really talking about strategy, like imo if gus plays his fast game vs chui he is gonna lose quite alot cuz chui is good enough not to get run over.
Someone said 50hands heads up is a small sample-size, well gus's style helps create that small sample size, his style is asking for luck to play a bigger role. Im just saying this bc he seemed to raise pf way too frequently heads up. The blinds were huge and just a few misteps can add up.
#8
Posted 27 April 2008 - 07:47 PM
QUOTE (chgocubs99 @ Sunday, April 27th, 2008, 11:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Your too mellow with the downswing. Pls bust out of that ASAP.
Haha, working on it! 14 buy-ins left!
Snamuh raises to $76.75, and is all in
BigKamp: yyou lose
BigKamp has 15 seconds left to act
BigKamp calls $24.50, and is all in
Seat 1: BigKamp (small blind) mucked [Ad Ac] - a full house, Aces full of Kings
Seat 2: Snamuh (big blind) showed [Kd Kh] and won ($102.50) with four of a kind, Kings
Snamuh: you lose
BigKamp: yyou lose
BigKamp has 15 seconds left to act
BigKamp calls $24.50, and is all in
Seat 1: BigKamp (small blind) mucked [Ad Ac] - a full house, Aces full of Kings
Seat 2: Snamuh (big blind) showed [Kd Kh] and won ($102.50) with four of a kind, Kings
Snamuh: you lose
#9
Posted 27 April 2008 - 07:48 PM
QUOTE (dscoot @ Sunday, April 27th, 2008, 11:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
that thread is more of an update thread and not really talking about strategy, like imo if gus plays his fast game vs chui he is gonna lose quite alot cuz chui is good enough not to get run over.
Someone said 50hands heads up is a small sample-size, well gus's style helps create that small sample size, his style is asking for luck to play a bigger role. Im just saying this bc he seemed to raise pf way too frequently heads up. The blinds were huge and just a few misteps can add up.
Someone said 50hands heads up is a small sample-size, well gus's style helps create that small sample size, his style is asking for luck to play a bigger role. Im just saying this bc he seemed to raise pf way too frequently heads up. The blinds were huge and just a few misteps can add up.
Ship the 500 posts.
Snamuh raises to $76.75, and is all in
BigKamp: yyou lose
BigKamp has 15 seconds left to act
BigKamp calls $24.50, and is all in
Seat 1: BigKamp (small blind) mucked [Ad Ac] - a full house, Aces full of Kings
Seat 2: Snamuh (big blind) showed [Kd Kh] and won ($102.50) with four of a kind, Kings
Snamuh: you lose
BigKamp: yyou lose
BigKamp has 15 seconds left to act
BigKamp calls $24.50, and is all in
Seat 1: BigKamp (small blind) mucked [Ad Ac] - a full house, Aces full of Kings
Seat 2: Snamuh (big blind) showed [Kd Kh] and won ($102.50) with four of a kind, Kings
Snamuh: you lose
#10
Posted 27 April 2008 - 07:48 PM
QUOTE (dscoot @ Sunday, April 27th, 2008, 10:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
that thread is more of an update thread and not really talking about strategy, like imo if gus plays his fast game vs chui he is gonna lose quite alot cuz chui is good enough not to get run over.
Someone said 50hands heads up is a small sample-size, well gus's style helps create that small sample size, his style is asking for luck to play a bigger role. Im just saying this bc he seemed to raise pf way too frequently heads up. The blinds were huge and just a few misteps can add up.
Someone said 50hands heads up is a small sample-size, well gus's style helps create that small sample size, his style is asking for luck to play a bigger role. Im just saying this bc he seemed to raise pf way too frequently heads up. The blinds were huge and just a few misteps can add up.
I'll say this as nice as possible...
1) It's "Chiu"
2) Pretty much everything that I bolded is factually incorrect.
QUOTE (dscoot @ Friday, April 10th, 2009, 3:20 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
im still not sold that many of these people that get these big online scores are winners when it comes to the live game, which, by the way, is real poker.
#11
Posted 27 April 2008 - 07:50 PM
QUOTE (dscoot @ Sunday, April 27th, 2008, 10:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
that thread is more of an update thread and not really talking about strategy, like imo if gus plays his fast game vs chui he is gonna lose quite alot cuz chui is good enough not to get run over.
Someone said 50hands heads up is a small sample-size, well gus's style helps create that small sample size, his style is asking for luck to play a bigger role. Im just saying this bc he seemed to raise pf way too frequently heads up. The blinds were huge and just a few misteps can add up.
Someone said 50hands heads up is a small sample-size, well gus's style helps create that small sample size, his style is asking for luck to play a bigger role. Im just saying this bc he seemed to raise pf way too frequently heads up. The blinds were huge and just a few misteps can add up.
You cant judge how either of them played based on 50 hands, esp without seeing the cards.
How do you know that gus didnt raise it up a ton with quality hands and Chiu kept calling and flopping 2 pair. Maybe Gus played absolutly amazing but the cards just wouldnt cooperate. And again I point out that he got his money in good for the tourney on the last hand.
Youre being completely results oriented
What if the 'HOKEY POKEY' really IS what it's ALL about?
#12
Posted 27 April 2008 - 07:53 PM
QUOTE (chgocubs99 @ Sunday, April 27th, 2008, 10:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
2) Pretty much everything that I bolded is factually incorrect.
But is it infactually correct?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









