Jump to content


do you make the call?


  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

#1 custom36

custom36

    FCP Veteran

  • Members
  • 16,093 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 May 2005 - 04:47 PM

*Note - the converter hates UB. Deal with it.Ultimate Bet NL Hold'em 0.25/0.50Hero: $49Villian: $23Hero is CO with A :) K :club:3 limpers to Hero. Hero raises to $2. Folded to limpers, who all call.Flop: Q :D J :D 6 :club:Checked to Hero. Hero bets $5. One fold. UTG+1 goes all in for $21 total. Folded to hero.Do you call?

#2 Vade

Vade

    Forum Shopkeeper

  • Members
  • 3,864 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee, WI
  • Interests:Poker, Sports, Movies

Posted 06 May 2005 - 04:51 PM

16 dollars to win 34 dollars is the pot odds.I like the call here. You've got 9 clean outs and 6 of what are referred to as 1/2 outs as an A or a K may or may not make you the best hand. So presume 12 outs. You should win this pot almost half the time getting over 2-1 on your money.Go get em :D
Last night I stayed up late playing poker with Tarot cards. I got a full house and four people died.

#3 Swift_Psycho

Swift_Psycho

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 4,889 posts

Posted 06 May 2005 - 04:53 PM

Vade said:

16 dollars to win 34 dollars is the pot odds.I like the call here.  You've got 9 clean outs and 6 of what are referred to as 1/2 outs as an A or a K may or may not make you the best hand.  So presume 12 outs.  You should win this pot almost half the time getting over 2-1 on your money.Go get em :D
Your forgetting his straight draw outs as well.

#4 Vade

Vade

    Forum Shopkeeper

  • Members
  • 3,864 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee, WI
  • Interests:Poker, Sports, Movies

Posted 06 May 2005 - 04:54 PM

Whoops I amEven better then :D
Last night I stayed up late playing poker with Tarot cards. I got a full house and four people died.

#5 custom36

custom36

    FCP Veteran

  • Members
  • 16,093 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 May 2005 - 05:12 PM

No debate? Nobody that would even consider a fold? Jesus, I may have to post the results soon (there's a surprise ending to this hand).

#6 Vade

Vade

    Forum Shopkeeper

  • Members
  • 3,864 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee, WI
  • Interests:Poker, Sports, Movies

Posted 06 May 2005 - 05:16 PM

Custom36 said:

No debate?  Nobody that would even consider a fold?  Jesus, I may have to post the results soon (there's a surprise ending to this hand).
There's no debate because you must call here mathematically in a cash game ;)A tournament you'd get a lot of arguers against.What could someone use as an argument against a call here? That they don't like risking their 16 dollars?
Last night I stayed up late playing poker with Tarot cards. I got a full house and four people died.

#7 custom36

custom36

    FCP Veteran

  • Members
  • 16,093 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 May 2005 - 05:19 PM

Lol, I was hoping it wasn't that simple. I thought about a fold, but then I counted all of my outs and decided it would be stupid to fold. I called.Turn: 4 :diamond:River: 4 :heart:He turns over K :D 10 :) and I take down the pot. I love Friday.

#8 Swift_Psycho

Swift_Psycho

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 4,889 posts

Posted 06 May 2005 - 05:20 PM

Custom36 said:

No debate?  Nobody that would even consider a fold?  Jesus, I may have to post the results soon (there's a surprise ending to this hand).
The thing is that I wouldn't be faced with the same decision as you. After 3 limpers, you only raised to 4x the BB. I'd probably have made it more like 6. That would have led to a larger flop bet. By the time the guy moved in, I'd be forced to call off the rest of my chips with this draw because of how much I would have had committed.Truthfully though, this is almost certainly an easy call. If you are against top two, it would be a horrible fold. Against a set, it's very close. Your getting slightly better than 2-1 on this call and your barely worse than a 2-1 underdog against a set. I call in your position.

#9 Vade

Vade

    Forum Shopkeeper

  • Members
  • 3,864 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee, WI
  • Interests:Poker, Sports, Movies

Posted 06 May 2005 - 05:20 PM

Sweet. You had him drawing dead to a 9 or an Ace :D
Last night I stayed up late playing poker with Tarot cards. I got a full house and four people died.

#10 princeof56k

princeof56k

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,520 posts
  • Location:houston, tx

Posted 06 May 2005 - 05:31 PM

While I agree that mathematically this is a call, I just keep thinking the guy has a set for some reason. Any reads on this guy? I mean there's a straight and a flush draw on the board. He might also think you have Q with a good kicker. I keep thinking this is a set of 6's hoping for a call. If you think you are up against a set that might change things. While you are on a draw to beat him, even if you hit your hand he could outdraw you with a full house.EDIT: oops, posted a little late and saw the results. I was dead wrong. lol

#11 Swift_Psycho

Swift_Psycho

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 4,889 posts

Posted 06 May 2005 - 05:37 PM

princeof56k said:

While I agree that mathematically this is a call, I just keep thinking the guy has a set for some reason.  Any reads on this guy?  I mean there's a straight and a flush draw on the board.  He might also think you have Q with a good kicker.  I keep thinking this is a set of 6's hoping for a call.  If you think you are up against a set that might change things.  While you are on a draw to beat him,  even if you hit your hand he could outdraw you with a full house.EDIT: oops, posted a little late and saw the results.  I was dead wrong. lol
Here's the thing though, the math is so incredibly close that it's about a break-even call if he calls with this hand against a set. If there is any chance that the guy doesn't have a set (and of course there is), folding here is horrible.

#12 custom36

custom36

    FCP Veteran

  • Members
  • 16,093 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 May 2005 - 05:40 PM

princeof56k said:

While I agree that mathematically this is a call, I just keep thinking the guy has a set for some reason.  Any reads on this guy?  I mean there's a straight and a flush draw on the board.  He might also think you have Q with a good kicker.  I keep thinking this is a set of 6's hoping for a call.  If you think you are up against a set that might change things.  While you are on a draw to beat him,  even if you hit your hand he could outdraw you with a full house.EDIT: oops, posted a little late and saw the results.  I was dead wrong. lol
:eh:Yeah, I have the nut flush and nut straight draw. If he makes his flush, I win. If I'm up against a set, the only way to pair that flop while making my flush is with the Q :D and even then I have a royal flush draw.

#13 Vade

Vade

    Forum Shopkeeper

  • Members
  • 3,864 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee, WI
  • Interests:Poker, Sports, Movies

Posted 06 May 2005 - 05:41 PM

princeof56k said:

While I agree that mathematically this is a call, I just keep thinking the guy has a set for some reason.  Any reads on this guy?  I mean there's a straight and a flush draw on the board.  He might also think you have Q with a good kicker.  I keep thinking this is a set of 6's hoping for a call.  If you think you are up against a set that might change things.  While you are on a draw to beat him,  even if you hit your hand he could outdraw you with a full house.EDIT: oops, posted a little late and saw the results.  I was dead wrong. lol
Most players can't put people on bottom set, I know I can't. This is why the math comes through as the only deciding factor. 16 outs and over 2-1 on the call
Last night I stayed up late playing poker with Tarot cards. I got a full house and four people died.

#14 princeof56k

princeof56k

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,520 posts
  • Location:houston, tx

Posted 06 May 2005 - 05:51 PM

Swift_Psycho said:

Here's the thing though, the math is so incredibly close that it's about a break-even call if he calls with this hand against a set.  If there is any chance that the guy doesn't have a set (and of course there is), folding here is horrible.
First I want t say I agree with you.Not that I want to make a big issue about this, but just as an exercise I went to odds calculator and supposed the villan had a pair of 6's (since a set is the worst thing he could up against). The results came out to be 33% for our hero. Which is almost exactly the odds he is getting. So you are right, this is a mathematical call since there is always the possiblity he doesnt have a set and he is basically even against the worst case senario.

#15 custom36

custom36

    FCP Veteran

  • Members
  • 16,093 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 May 2005 - 05:57 PM

33%?Any club that doesn't pair the board wins it for me = 8 outs.Any 10 wins it for me = 3 outsThen there are runner-runner possibilites, but I won't count them.11 outs = 42%, doesn't it?

#16 princeof56k

princeof56k

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,520 posts
  • Location:houston, tx

Posted 06 May 2005 - 06:10 PM

Custom36 said:

33%?Any club  that doesn't pair the board wins it for me = 8 outs.Any 10 wins it for me = 3 outsThen there are runner-runner possibilites, but I won't count them.11 outs = 42%, doesn't it?
Suppose you are against a set of 6's, and on the turn you make your flush with a 2 of clubs. At that point, your opponent has 10 outs to beat you (3 Queens, 3 Jacks, 3 Twos, and the last Six). Basically all he has to to is pair the board to beat you.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users