Banning Trans Fats?
#1
Posted 24 February 2008 - 06:53 PM
Edit: I am a retard, someone please move this to OT.
#2
Posted 24 February 2008 - 06:55 PM
Edit: I am a retard, someone please move this to OT.
wow

"If it wasn't for luck I'd win every one" -- Phil Hellmuth
#3
Posted 24 February 2008 - 07:34 PM
You're missing out on their coleslaw and gravy/poutine. Mmmm. Their hot wings are tasty as well.
#4
Posted 24 February 2008 - 07:36 PM
Please don't say Manitoba, please don't say Manitoba!
#5
Posted 24 February 2008 - 07:41 PM
#6
Posted 24 February 2008 - 07:45 PM

for great rakeback paid daily at RakeUpdate, click here !
for great rakeback paid monthly at RaketheRake, please refer to member RTR20401
#7
Posted 24 February 2008 - 08:14 PM
"The whole modern world has divided itself into Conservatives and Progressives. The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of the Conservatives is to prevent the mistakes from being corrected." G.K. Chesterson 1900
timwakefield, on 18 April 2012 - 10:38 AM, said:
#8
Posted 24 February 2008 - 08:25 PM
#9
Posted 24 February 2008 - 08:30 PM
KidPoker: Im not a fan of the back door personally, despite forum rumors!
#10
Posted 24 February 2008 - 08:30 PM
Then they will help you not to break your legs skiing by shutting down the lifts.
Then they will go to work on your other sports.
But hey, they are here to help protect you from yourself.
"The whole modern world has divided itself into Conservatives and Progressives. The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of the Conservatives is to prevent the mistakes from being corrected." G.K. Chesterson 1900
timwakefield, on 18 April 2012 - 10:38 AM, said:
#11
Posted 24 February 2008 - 09:14 PM
Makes no sense to sell cigarettes then but they do. Makes no sense to sell liqour then but they do. Makes no sense to sell many of the pharmemeuciticals but they do. My guess is in long run more peoples life will be cut short from pollution from carbons but they will never try and take are cars away. But if I want a burger and fries that taste good every once and awhile no I cant because it might kill me 40 years down the road.
#12
Posted 24 February 2008 - 09:25 PM
#13
Posted 24 February 2008 - 09:28 PM
I saw that then this week they announce this BS. Maybe I should open a modern day speak easy for fattys
#14
Posted 24 February 2008 - 09:28 PM
#15
Posted 24 February 2008 - 09:32 PM
Do you eat types of foods that were effected(had to change the recipes, ect). My understanding is there is pretty much no getting around trans fats when it comes to some pastrys. I also heard McDonalds cant find a recipe that works for there fries. Have you eaten there since the ban?
#16
Posted 24 February 2008 - 09:33 PM
I eat at McD's but I don't get the fries because they're so darn unhealthy. Hope that helps, though I know it doesn't.
#17
Posted 24 February 2008 - 09:35 PM
That can't be true, can it? A smoker has a 50% chance of not contracting cancer/emphysema? It's gotta be much higher than that, yes?
Someone help me out here.
#18
Posted 24 February 2008 - 09:36 PM
That can't be true, can it? A smoker has a 50% chance of not contracting cancer/emphysema? It's gotta be much higher than that, yes?
Someone help me out here.
The warning labels on cigarettes up here state that 50% of smokers die from smoking related illnesses.
#19
Posted 24 February 2008 - 09:37 PM
Weird.
As to this topic, I don't know whether I agree with the OP, or whether I think people are so stupid as to need people telling them what to do, or whether I am indifferent altogether.
I'll pick one of those options at random if I'm forced to make a play on the subject later.
#20
Posted 24 February 2008 - 09:40 PM
That can't be true, can it? A smoker has a 50% chance of not contracting cancer/emphysema? It's gotta be much higher than that, yes?
Someone help me out here.
http://www.mskcc.org/mskcc/html/12463.cfm
I did the test...a 60 year old that has been smoking 20 cigarettes a day for 40 years has a 6% chance of developing lung cancer in the next ten years. I know lung cancer is just one of the possible killers that can be partially caused by smoking, but if it's that low of a percentage it can't be even close to 50% overall.
Not that anyone should take a 6% chance.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









