grocery_mony 9 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 The province I live in announced this week that they will eliminate all trans fats sold in restraunts by 2010. I am personnally disgusted with this decision. I am all for labeling such foods but to outright ban them is too big brotherish. I find extremely hypocritical that the same government makes more than $2 a pack in tax on cigarettes a product that it is proven that half its users die a slow painful death and are extremely addictive. For christ sakes we are adults and can make are own decsions on what we eat. Though I dont eat at KFC people I know who do say that when they eliminated trans fats the taste of the product suffered. Even if they wanted to put some sort of tax on trans fat I wt would be better than saying you cant have them at all. Sorry for venting but I like me some trans fats.Edit: I am a retard, someone please move this to OT. Link to post Share on other sites
HollywoodAFD 0 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 The province I live in announced this week that they will eliminate all trans fats sold in restraunts by 2010. I am personnally disgusted with this decision. I am all for labeling such foods but to outright ban them is too big brotherish. I find extremely hypocritical that the same government makes more than $2 a pack in tax on cigarettes a product that it is proven that half its users die a slow painful death and are extremely addictive. For christ sakes we are adults and can make are own decsions on what we eat. Though I dont eat at KFC people I know who do say that when they eliminated trans fats the taste of the product suffered. Even if they wanted to put some sort of tax on trans fat I wt would be better than saying you cant have them at all. Sorry for venting but I like me some trans fats.Edit: I am a retard, someone please move this to OT.wow Link to post Share on other sites
MrJohn 0 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 Though I dont eat at KFCYou're missing out on their coleslaw and gravy/poutine. Mmmm. Their hot wings are tasty as well. Link to post Share on other sites
kkot 0 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 The province I live inPlease don't say Manitoba, please don't say Manitoba! Link to post Share on other sites
ROACHBABY 0 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 I am a retardQFT!!! Link to post Share on other sites
finztotheleft 0 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 New York City and Boston seem to be doing okay without transfats. There are still plenty of other yummy fatty foods around. Link to post Share on other sites
Balloon guy 158 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 But you have free healthcare? Link to post Share on other sites
terradawg 0 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 yeah, that's terrible. your government is trying to help you. how awful. move this to bad beats... Link to post Share on other sites
MyPlayIsRAB 0 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 fwiw its all of canada not just newbish donklumbia Link to post Share on other sites
Balloon guy 158 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 Hopefully they will get around to helping you not piss away your money online playing poker.Then they will help you not to break your legs skiing by shutting down the lifts.Then they will go to work on your other sports.But hey, they are here to help protect you from yourself. Link to post Share on other sites
grocery_mony 9 Posted February 25, 2008 Author Share Posted February 25, 2008 yeah, that's terrible. your government is trying to help you. how awful. move this to bad beats...Makes no sense to sell cigarettes then but they do. Makes no sense to sell liqour then but they do. Makes no sense to sell many of the pharmemeuciticals but they do. My guess is in long run more peoples life will be cut short from pollution from carbons but they will never try and take are cars away. But if I want a burger and fries that taste good every once and awhile no I cant because it might kill me 40 years down the road. Link to post Share on other sites
speedz99 145 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 There was a good King of the Hill about this a few weeks ago. Link to post Share on other sites
grocery_mony 9 Posted February 25, 2008 Author Share Posted February 25, 2008 There was a good King of the Hill about this a few weeks ago.I saw that then this week they announce this BS. Maybe I should open a modern day speak easy for fattys Link to post Share on other sites
LongLiveYorke 38 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 I haven't noticed even the slightest difference in NYC. I understand if you have a theoretical reason to be against it, but practically it will make no difference. Link to post Share on other sites
grocery_mony 9 Posted February 25, 2008 Author Share Posted February 25, 2008 I haven't noticed even the slightest difference in NYC. I understand if you have a theoretical reason to be against it, but practically it will make no difference.Do you eat types of foods that were effected(had to change the recipes, ect). My understanding is there is pretty much no getting around trans fats when it comes to some pastrys. I also heard McDonalds cant find a recipe that works for there fries. Have you eaten there since the ban? Link to post Share on other sites
LongLiveYorke 38 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 Do you eat types of foods that were effected(had to change the recipes, ect). My understanding is there is pretty much no getting around trans fats when it comes to some pastrys. I also heard McDonalds cant find a recipe that works for there fries. Have you eaten there since the ban?I eat at McD's but I don't get the fries because they're so darn unhealthy. Hope that helps, though I know it doesn't. Link to post Share on other sites
GWCGWC 83 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 I find extremely hypocritical that the same government makes more than $2 a pack in tax on cigarettes a product that it is proven that half its users die a slow painful death and are extremely addictive.That can't be true, can it? A smoker has a 50% chance of not contracting cancer/emphysema? It's gotta be much higher than that, yes? Someone help me out here. Link to post Share on other sites
grocery_mony 9 Posted February 25, 2008 Author Share Posted February 25, 2008 I find extremely hypocritical that the same government makes more than $2 a pack in tax on cigarettes a product that it is proven that half its users die a slow painful death and are extremely addictive.That can't be true, can it? A smoker has a 50% chance of not contracting cancer/emphysema? It's gotta be much higher than that, yes? Someone help me out here.The warning labels on cigarettes up here state that 50% of smokers die from smoking related illnesses. Link to post Share on other sites
Spademan 94 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 Speedz, you've seen a King of the Hill episode that relates to everything. Weird. As to this topic, I don't know whether I agree with the OP, or whether I think people are so stupid as to need people telling them what to do, or whether I am indifferent altogether. I'll pick one of those options at random if I'm forced to make a play on the subject later. Link to post Share on other sites
speedz99 145 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 I find extremely hypocritical that the same government makes more than $2 a pack in tax on cigarettes a product that it is proven that half its users die a slow painful death and are extremely addictive.That can't be true, can it? A smoker has a 50% chance of not contracting cancer/emphysema? It's gotta be much higher than that, yes? Someone help me out here. http://www.mskcc.org/mskcc/html/12463.cfmI did the test...a 60 year old that has been smoking 20 cigarettes a day for 40 years has a 6% chance of developing lung cancer in the next ten years. I know lung cancer is just one of the possible killers that can be partially caused by smoking, but if it's that low of a percentage it can't be even close to 50% overall.Not that anyone should take a 6% chance. Link to post Share on other sites
speedz99 145 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 Speedz, you've seen a King of the Hill episode that relates to everything.It just that good of a show.The warning labels on cigarettes up here state that 50% of smokers die from smoking related illnesses.I guess I was wrong. Link to post Share on other sites
Vinnie_Terranova 5 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 As to this topic, I don't know whether I agree with the OP, or whether I think people are so stupid as to need people telling them what to do, or whether I am indifferent altogether. I'll pick one of those options at random if I'm forced to make a play on the subject later.This is almost exactly how I feel. Except I could never have said it so efficiently. Link to post Share on other sites
GWCGWC 83 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 The warning labels on cigarettes up here state that 50% of smokers die from smoking related illnesses.You all have some pretty pics on your cigarette packs too. http://www.mskcc.org/mskcc/html/12463.cfmI did the test...a 60 year old that has been smoking 20 cigarettes a day for 40 years has a 6% chance of developing lung cancer in the next ten years. I know lung cancer is just one of the possible killers that can be partially caused by smoking, but if it's that low of a percentage it can't be even close to 50% overall.Not that anyone should take a 6% chance.There's nothing good about smoking but pretty much everyone gets some kind of cancer if they live long enough. I obviously pulled that statement out of my cancer ridden colon. 6% of smokers get lung cancer? Again, I would expect that to be much higher. Link to post Share on other sites
speedz99 145 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 6% of smokers get lung cancer? Again, I would expect that to be much higher.If it was that much higher there would be entire hospitals dedicated to nothing else. Link to post Share on other sites
El Guapo 10 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 A few years ago McD's was cooking there fries in animal fat. When vegetarians freaked out, they switched and they fries tasted a bit different.Not really sure how that applies, but this thread made me think of this. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now