5 replies to this topic

[LJB723]

Cryptologic
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: t50/t100
6 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
UTG: t802
UTG+1: t1675
CO: t552
Button: t1980
SB: t2448
Hero: t2543

Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is BB with
UTG raises all-in t802, UTG+1 raises all-in t1675, 3 folds, Hero ???

Obviously UTG has a huge range being so short. But UTG+1 was instantly all-in. Should I call here hoping for Ax against AX and they have each others outs? Or that I'm up against a low pp and Ax? Must admit I haven't being paying a lot of attention 'cause I'm watching the football so take this as readless.

[sactownjoey]

Instamuck. You are likely coin flipping against two hands for most of your stack and you very well could be dominated by one of them. I'd probably fold everything but QQ+ here.

[Shark527]

Going as readless on the table, I would fold.

I think TT is just too weak to play for that much of your stack against two opponents. They could have lower PP but I wouldn't think so. I'd figure UTG+1 to have a pretty strong hand here trying to isolate against the rest of the table from that early position. Your a coin flip against any big A and they could both have overcards so against 2 shared (like AK) 3 (AK/AQ) or 4 overcards (AK,QJ) what are you then? -4 given that UTG range is anything being so short - also throw in any PP lower and higher than yours.

Fold.

[AKProdigy]

My calling range here is AK, QQ+, maybe JJ

[MovingIn]

I can see a variety of hands from the first shove, Ax, KJ+, decent suited connectors, any pair... but the second shove indicates strength, the sort of range I'd expect TT to be in the middle of at best (AK, AQ, AA-77)... and then facing the other all-in as well that could be anything from desperation marginal crap to AA...

... easy fold.

Quick EDIT: My calling/overshove range here is right alongside AK's ^^^^^^^^^^^^.

[copernicus]

At first I thought this was a chip equity coinflip, with about 35% chance of beating both and 20% chance of beating UTG+1 but losing to UTG but that turns out to be a significant money loser, only returning 1167 for the 1525 commitment.