The Steven Stamkos Sweepstakes
#1
Posted 07 February 2008 - 08:39 PM
1. Los Angeles Kings 25%
2. Tampa Bay Lightning 18.8%
3. Chicago Blackhawks 14.2%
4. New York Islanders 10.7%
5. Toronto Maple Leafs 8.1%
#2
Posted 07 February 2008 - 09:10 PM
#3
Posted 07 February 2008 - 09:20 PM
http://www.nhl.com/nhl/app?service=page&am...e=StandingsPage
#4
Posted 07 February 2008 - 09:24 PM
I be darned. Thanks.
#5
Posted 07 February 2008 - 09:32 PM
They did, until Toews went down, Havlat forgot how to score goals (he's scored in exactly 4 games all year), Khabibulin forgot how to win games (tonight was his first win since December) and the Hawks went 4-10 in January.
Losing to Los Angles 9-2 was basically the beginning of the end, that's the game they lost Toews in and they haven't been the same since.
#6
Posted 07 February 2008 - 10:26 PM
Losing to Los Angles 9-2 was basically the beginning of the end, that's the game they lost Toews in and they haven't been the same since.
Williams and Adams' injuries hurt also. They are the type of players that were supposed to keep a young team from going on losing streaks. Sopel was injured for a while there also. I know it sounds bad, but I don't want the Hawks to get Stamkos, too many young guys already.

#7
Posted 08 February 2008 - 12:03 AM
If the Hawks ended up with the #1 overall, they'd be foolish not to trade down a couple spots for an extra pick and take one of the defensemen. If they end up drafting #2 or #3 I'd expect them to take Doughty or Pietrangelo.
#8
Posted 09 February 2008 - 04:52 AM
1. Los Angeles Kings 25%
2. Tampa Bay Lightning 18.8%
3. Toronto Maple Leafs 14.2%
4. Chicago Blackhawks 10.7%
5. New York Islanders 8.1%
#9
Posted 09 February 2008 - 07:34 AM
1. Los Angeles Kings 25%
2. Tampa Bay Lightning 18.8%
3. Toronto Maple Leafs 14.2%
4. Chicago Blackhawks 10.7%
5. New York Islanders 8.1%
That adds up to 76.8 -- the remaining 24% either all goes to LA or is split evenly...
#10
Posted 09 February 2008 - 09:13 AM
#11
Posted 09 February 2008 - 09:18 AM
yes, but the max they can move up to is the #2 or #3 pick IIRC (if I recall correctly).
#12
Posted 09 February 2008 - 09:26 AM
Correct. The most you can move up is three places.
#13
Posted 09 February 2008 - 11:43 AM
Chicago moved from 5 to 1 last year, right?
#14
Posted 09 February 2008 - 11:44 AM
sorry, if you're not in the top 5, the most you can move up is 3 places.... I think it's the top 5 anyway
#15
Posted 17 October 2008 - 05:41 AM
Back to junior you will soon go....
Keep pinning your hopes on DRAFT PICKS...big success you will be...
#16
Posted 17 October 2008 - 05:47 AM
#17
Posted 17 October 2008 - 05:53 AM
ya ok...you are way off...
Stamkos was hyped as the rookie of the year by all of the media.. He has done nothing so far averaging about 9 minutes a game...I dont think its a huge assesment that he will not be the impact player that he has been touted, especially NOT YET.
To take your argument further..Poker is profitable because you have to think outside the box and go against what the masses think is the right thing and they have been telling you to do..
Just because Gruven said Stamkos is rookie of the year and the Leafs will finish last , doesnt mean it will happen.
#18
Posted 17 October 2008 - 06:00 AM
#19
Posted 17 October 2008 - 06:01 AM
So far everything I have is coming true....
And my predictions, are conventional.
#20
Posted 17 October 2008 - 06:04 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










