shorthanded limit hand
Started by custom36, May 02 2005 11:58 PM
14 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 02 May 2005 - 11:58 PM
Absolute Poker $0.50/1 Limit HE 6-max tableHero is button with A
Q :diamond:Preflop: UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, MP calls, Hero raises, SB folds, BB reraises, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, MP calls, Hero calls.I just call the reraise because a cap seems like a bad idea (I could just be weak here).Flop: ($7.50) 9
8
6 :spade:BB bets, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, MP calls, Hero callsI call here because I think he just has high cards and I have a backdoor flush draw with a monster pot.Turn: ($10.00) 2 :spade:BB bets, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, MP calls, Hero callsAgain, I'm getting odds to chase the flush with 2 over cards. I have no idea what the cold callers have got. I'm not going to fold - would raising have been a good idea?River: ($15.00) 5 :spade:BB checks, UTG checks, UTG+1 checks, MP checks, Hero bets, BB calls, 2 folds, MP calls.I hit my miracle card. I bet here, and I'm sure BB calls to see it. I'm not quite sure why MP called. Had it been a smaller pot, I would have folded somehwere along the line, but this was huge and I saw no reason to fold with these kind of pot odds. Was I right to stay in?Showdown: ($18.00)
#2
Posted 03 May 2005 - 12:23 AM
If it was suited, I would have capped because we have the button.This play looks standard.
back for kramit
#3
Posted 03 May 2005 - 04:17 AM
The only thing I was uncertain of was your raise pre-flop from the button with all those callers ahead of you. Not that I think it was wrong to do, but the fact that all those limpers ended up calling two bets after the BB re-raised would have me worried no matter what the flop was.Taking one off, as it is sometimes referred to, on the flop is a standard play, to see what develops with your high potential hand. Especially considering you have position. Had someone raised the BB after the flop, then it becomes a lot more difficult to take that turn card. As it happens, you caught a spade on the turn (which is what you wanted), so all is well in the universe. I wouldn't be too worried about the straight possibility after the flop (doubtful the BB re-raised with 7-10 or something similar, so you have two overcards and a backdoor flush possible. Well played before the river in my opinion. Your only option was to bet on the river, so it was all in all a well-played hand IMO. :wink:
#4
Posted 03 May 2005 - 05:56 AM
Should he have raised the turn? There were 14 BBs in there when the betting got to him, with 8 clean outs to the nuts, and 6 outs to either a non-nut A-high flugh, TPTK or TP2K. Are those enough outs to raise the turn for pot-building purposes, even with the possibility of a made flush 3-betting?
#5
Posted 03 May 2005 - 07:15 AM
The only thing I don't like here is your play on the flop, the rest is good. You don't want to bet the turn, you have pot odds to call the turn, not raise the turn. Now, as for the flop, you say you called because you thought he only had high cards, well that's all that you have, and if you're counting on the backdoor flush, forget it came up, you should be folding. With four other people in and all calling you're probably beat. Even if he had two high cards (I would put him on a high pair, I don't know why you'd bet out at four other players with just high cards), but let's say he has two high cards. The triple bet before the flop suggests he probably has AK, so if the ace comes it's no help to you. A queen maybe wins it for you. So I fold here. You're going to make the flush about 1/36, and MAYBE the queen wins is for you. Or maybe you hit your ace and lose a couple more bets, or maybe you make your Q and still lose.I fold the flop, the rest I would do the same as you did.
#6
Posted 03 May 2005 - 07:21 AM
Rocketwadster said:
The only thing I was uncertain of was your raise pre-flop from the button with all those callers ahead of you. Not that I think it was wrong to do, but the fact that all those limpers ended up calling two bets after the BB re-raised would have me worried no matter what the flop was.
QUOTE (CozMyn @ Sunday, March 8th, 2009, 5:54 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
i tried to talk here about that program, the RNG , not to talk about when to accept all in without to see flop.
You can accept all in whenever you want, or whenever you feel lucky, but in virtual room's is not like in reality. In reality anything is possible... in virtual rooms you can be "the one" who knows the future, or who can change the future.
You can accept all in whenever you want, or whenever you feel lucky, but in virtual room's is not like in reality. In reality anything is possible... in virtual rooms you can be "the one" who knows the future, or who can change the future.
#7
Posted 03 May 2005 - 07:27 AM
dbdbarry said:
The only thing I don't like here is your play on the flop, the rest is good. You don't want to bet the turn, you have pot odds to call the turn, not raise the turn. Now, as for the flop, you say you called because you thought he only had high cards, well that's all that you have, and if you're counting on the backdoor flush, forget it came up, you should be folding. With four other people in and all calling you're probably beat. Even if he had two high cards (I would put him on a high pair, I don't know why you'd bet out at four other players with just high cards), but let's say he has two high cards. The triple bet before the flop suggests he probably has AK, so if the ace comes it's no help to you. A queen maybe wins it for you. So I fold here. You're going to make the flush about 1/36, and MAYBE the queen wins is for you. Or maybe you hit your ace and lose a couple more bets, or maybe you make your Q and still lose.I fold the flop, the rest I would do the same as you did.
QUOTE (CozMyn @ Sunday, March 8th, 2009, 5:54 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
i tried to talk here about that program, the RNG , not to talk about when to accept all in without to see flop.
You can accept all in whenever you want, or whenever you feel lucky, but in virtual room's is not like in reality. In reality anything is possible... in virtual rooms you can be "the one" who knows the future, or who can change the future.
You can accept all in whenever you want, or whenever you feel lucky, but in virtual room's is not like in reality. In reality anything is possible... in virtual rooms you can be "the one" who knows the future, or who can change the future.
#8
Posted 03 May 2005 - 08:06 AM
dbdbarry said:
I fold the flop, the rest I would do the same as you did.
#9
Posted 03 May 2005 - 11:10 AM
I wouldn't change much. Your flop call was maybe a bit loose, but close enough.
#10
Posted 03 May 2005 - 11:12 AM
rog said:
I wouldn't change much. Your flop call was maybe a bit loose, but close enough.
#11
Posted 03 May 2005 - 11:12 AM
rog said:
I wouldn't change much. Your flop call was maybe a bit loose, but close enough.
QUOTE (CozMyn @ Sunday, March 8th, 2009, 5:54 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
i tried to talk here about that program, the RNG , not to talk about when to accept all in without to see flop.
You can accept all in whenever you want, or whenever you feel lucky, but in virtual room's is not like in reality. In reality anything is possible... in virtual rooms you can be "the one" who knows the future, or who can change the future.
You can accept all in whenever you want, or whenever you feel lucky, but in virtual room's is not like in reality. In reality anything is possible... in virtual rooms you can be "the one" who knows the future, or who can change the future.
#12
Posted 03 May 2005 - 01:41 PM
wrto4556 said:
This play looks standard.
back for kramit
#14
Posted 03 May 2005 - 03:29 PM
You are 4.1:1 to hit your flush so a raise on the turn is debatable. The EV between raising and calling the turn is close. Else it is fine. Don't you dare fold that flop.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










