skribe 0 Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 I've played a lot of PLO and I can never decide if it's more profitable to play 1 or 2 tables with a full buy in or 3 or 4 shorter. I always imagine tht the more tables I play, within reason, the more my variance is reduced. Any opinions on this? I definitely prefer playing big stacked, but I don't know. Link to post Share on other sites
skribe 0 Posted January 26, 2008 Author Share Posted January 26, 2008 i need some input before tomorrow's session plo junkies Link to post Share on other sites
bdc30 0 Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 full buyin, less tables ftw Link to post Share on other sites
Shark527 0 Posted January 28, 2008 Share Posted January 28, 2008 Would it be better to two table PLO with full buy ins? I usually four table limit hold'em simply because it is so much easier to follow the aciton. Too many PLO tables and I sometimes miss a few potential draws and pay attention to position less. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now