Who Has Visited The Most Us States?
#1
Posted 19 January 2008 - 09:20 AM
Wi,Il,Mn,Ohio,Ny,Mo,In,Sc,Nv,Az,Fl,Nj,Pa,Tn,Kentucky,Va,Washington DC.
I think there might be one more that I forgot, what about you?
BeatUontehRiver (FTP)
Hub Dub 04 (Cake)
Luck_Comes (UB)
#2
Posted 19 January 2008 - 09:22 AM
Wi,Il,Mn,Ohio,Ny,Mo,In,Sc,Nv,Az,Fl,Nj,Pa,Tn,Kentucky,Va,Washington DC.
I think there might be one more that I forgot, what about you?
if i were to flame you and I'm not I'd say
Washington DC isn't a state bonehead
#3
Posted 19 January 2008 - 09:25 AM
BeatUontehRiver (FTP)
Hub Dub 04 (Cake)
Luck_Comes (UB)
#4
Posted 19 January 2008 - 09:26 AM
ME, VT, NH, MA, CT, RI, NY, PA, NJ, MD, OH, VA, NC, GA, FL, LA, MO, IL, NE, CO, UT, WA, OR, CA, NV, AZ, NM, TX
#5
Posted 19 January 2008 - 09:27 AM
Not in a list of states you visited. But I see your point.
#6
Posted 19 January 2008 - 09:32 AM
#7
Posted 19 January 2008 - 09:33 AM
#8
Posted 19 January 2008 - 09:38 AM
It's definitely not a state
The reason that people want to make it a state is that the people who live there don't have representation in congress - no senators or reps
The reason that it didn't become and state and probably won't is well ... the people who live there are predominantly black and like Kayne West said ...
It's a sad paradox - the all the city's monuments are white - the president lives in the white house
and the only people who live there permanently are poor blacks
#9
Posted 19 January 2008 - 09:40 AM
Because it sounds better than Murder Capital.
#10
Posted 19 January 2008 - 09:45 AM
The reason that people want to make it a state is that the people who live there don't have representation in congress - no senators or reps
The reason that it didn't become and state and probably won't is well ... the people who live there are predominantly black and like Kayne West said ...
It's a sad paradox - the all the city's monuments are white - the president lives in the white house
and the only people who live there permanently are poor blacks
No, you are wrong. Or you are partly right but not in the way you intended.
The reason DC (and Puerto Rico and perhaps a few other places debatably) don't have a voting representative in Congress is because they would vote Democrat, and there are enough Republicans in Congress that they will never get a 2/3rds vote to create another Democrat state.
Typically most black people tend to vote Democrat, but it is their political leanings, not their race which is the issue here.
#11
Posted 19 January 2008 - 09:54 AM
#12
Posted 19 January 2008 - 09:57 AM
The reason DC (and Puerto Rico and perhaps a few other places debatably) don't have a voting representative in Congress is because they would vote Democrat, and there are enough Republicans in Congress that they will never get a 2/3rds vote to create another Democrat state.
Typically most black people tend to vote Democrat, but it is their political leanings, not their race which is the issue here.
Also it's stipulated in the Consititution that D.C. should be a "federal district". That makes it even harder to turn it into a state than a territory like PR.
#13
Posted 19 January 2008 - 10:01 AM
QUICK! What are they? lol

"If it wasn't for luck I'd win every one" -- Phil Hellmuth
#14
Posted 19 January 2008 - 10:03 AM
QUICK! What are they? lol
Last 2 as in Hawaii and Alaska?
I've been to:
Hawaii
California
Nevada
Arizona
Washington
Idaho
Montana
Wyoming
Colorado
North Dakota
South Dakota
Minnesota
Wisconsin
Illinois
Indiana
Ohio
Michigan
Maryland
Virginia
Florida
Only 20, which isn't a lot for someone who wants to visit all 50...kind of hard when I go to Vegas half of all my vacations.
#15
Posted 19 January 2008 - 10:08 AM
Bingo..and although I will be going to Hawaii this year...I dont see me ever going to Alaksa.

"If it wasn't for luck I'd win every one" -- Phil Hellmuth
#16
Posted 19 January 2008 - 10:12 AM
ME, VT, NH, MA, CT, RI, NY, PA, NJ, MD, OH, VA, NC, GA, FL, LA, MO, IL, NE, CO, UT, WA, OR, CA, NV, AZ, NM, TX
You've been to Nebraska, Illinois and Missouri, but never Iowa?
#17
Posted 19 January 2008 - 10:15 AM
The reason DC (and Puerto Rico and perhaps a few other places debatably) don't have a voting representative in Congress is because they would vote Democrat, and there are enough Republicans in Congress that they will never get a 2/3rds vote to create another Democrat state.
Typically most black people tend to vote Democrat, but it is their political leanings, not their race which is the issue here.
Heh don't be offended because I'm not trying to be a jerk but what you said proves that it is because of their race
You said Blacks vote mostly democrat so republicans don't want them voting - the republicans assume maybe correctly that most of their race have the same political leanings - thus it is their race
Although, if you want to say that blacks mostly vote democrat because they are percentage wise in a lower income class and lower income classes tend to vote democrat I'd buy that too
#18
Posted 19 January 2008 - 10:16 AM
Don't you feel safer knowing Speedz never stopped by to say hi?
#19
Posted 19 January 2008 - 10:37 AM
I've driven through, but never stopped there. It's actually a much better looking state than I expected.
#20
Posted 19 January 2008 - 10:37 AM
You said Blacks vote mostly democrat so republicans don't want them voting - the republicans assume maybe correctly that most of their race have the same political leanings - thus it is their race
Although, if you want to say that blacks mostly vote democrat because they are percentage wise in a lower income class and lower income classes tend to vote democrat I'd buy that too
I said you were partly right because of the fact that most black people vote Democrat, but if everyone in DC was white it wouldn't make any difference. It's not a race issue, it's a party issue.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









