Jump to content


limit he hand help


  • Please log in to reply
34 replies to this topic

#1 custom36

custom36

    FCP Veteran

  • Members
  • 16,093 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 01 May 2005 - 02:46 PM

I just started on Absolute Poker, and almost have enough points to get pokertracker (should have it by the end of the night). I don't know to get hand history there, so I'm gonna type it out.0.5/1 Limit Hold'em 9-handedHero is MP2 with AJ clubsUTG calls, folded to hero. Hero raises. SB and UTG call.SB is new to the table, UTG is tight/weakFlop: 8-5-7 rainbow2 checks. Hero bets. 2 calls.Turn: A2 checks. Hero bets. SB raises. UTG folds. Hero calls.Should I have 3-bet here?River: 9SB bets, Hero calls.Do I raise this?

#2 tskillz187

tskillz187

    Great Tiger, you're next!

  • Members
  • 6,131 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brockport/Buffalo, NY

Posted 01 May 2005 - 02:50 PM

no, no
Naismith (2:56:11 PM): fuckerflakeoutonmystakingnowmakingmillions

#3 tskillz187

tskillz187

    Great Tiger, you're next!

  • Members
  • 6,131 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brockport/Buffalo, NY

Posted 01 May 2005 - 02:52 PM

i guess you could argue a three bet the turn and then fold if he bets out on the river but then the pot is super big by that point, especially if he caps on the turn then you are just spewing chips away if you are gonna call him down, i think an argument can be made for folding on the turn, but i would call turn call river
Naismith (2:56:11 PM): fuckerflakeoutonmystakingnowmakingmillions

#4 KDawgCometh

KDawgCometh

    old skool

  • Moderators
  • 15,163 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:the bebop
  • Interests:poker(duh), soccer, football, rugby, music, and film

Posted 01 May 2005 - 03:29 PM

I'd threebet the turn, but the call behind on the river was fine
Wine Notes for those that care about such pretentious things

#5 Vade

Vade

    Forum Shopkeeper

  • Members
  • 3,864 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee, WI
  • Interests:Poker, Sports, Movies

Posted 01 May 2005 - 03:32 PM

I like the turn three bet also. He could be representing an ace, he could have a straight draw, or of course you could be behind.Raising the river is suicidal imo :D

#6 tskillz187

tskillz187

    Great Tiger, you're next!

  • Members
  • 6,131 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brockport/Buffalo, NY

Posted 01 May 2005 - 03:33 PM

KDawgCometh said:

I'd threebet the turn, but the call behind on the river was fine
and if he caps the turn do you call and then call a river bet?
Naismith (2:56:11 PM): fuckerflakeoutonmystakingnowmakingmillions

#7 custom36

custom36

    FCP Veteran

  • Members
  • 16,093 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 01 May 2005 - 03:44 PM

Well, thanks for your advice. A 3-bet crossed my mind, but I thought I may be pretty far behind. He had A-4. I really don't understand the check/raise on the turn. Maybe he thought he was going to hit the gutshot or maybe he's just a really big fish. I took down the pot - laughing.

#8 Vade

Vade

    Forum Shopkeeper

  • Members
  • 3,864 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee, WI
  • Interests:Poker, Sports, Movies

Posted 01 May 2005 - 03:49 PM

Custom36 said:

Well, thanks for your advice.  A 3-bet crossed my mind, but I thought I may be pretty far behind.  He had A-4.  I really don't understand the check/raise on the turn.  Maybe he thought he was going to hit the gutshot or maybe he's just a really big fish.  I took down the pot - laughing.
He's a fish of course ;)On top of that he presumed you had nothing...i dunno

#9 KDawgCometh

KDawgCometh

    old skool

  • Moderators
  • 15,163 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:the bebop
  • Interests:poker(duh), soccer, football, rugby, music, and film

Posted 01 May 2005 - 04:33 PM

tskillz187 said:

KDawgCometh said:

I'd threebet the turn, but the call behind on the river was fine
and if he caps the turn do you call and then call a river bet?
possibly. OP didn't give pot size so I can't fully determine, also there were no reads
Wine Notes for those that care about such pretentious things

#10 custom36

custom36

    FCP Veteran

  • Members
  • 16,093 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 01 May 2005 - 04:45 PM

KDawgCometh said:

tskillz187 said:

KDawgCometh said:

I'd threebet the turn, but the call behind on the river was fine
and if he caps the turn do you call and then call a river bet?
possibly. OP didn't give pot size so I can't fully determine, also there were no reads
Pot size when ___ card comes:Flop: $3.50Turn: $5.00River: $8.00Final: $10.00This is all minus rake, of course.

#11 tskillz187

tskillz187

    Great Tiger, you're next!

  • Members
  • 6,131 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brockport/Buffalo, NY

Posted 01 May 2005 - 05:10 PM

i think it would be giving you 10:1 odds to call on the river, but i dont think AJ wins with a cap on the turn and then a lead out on the river 10% given no reads
Naismith (2:56:11 PM): fuckerflakeoutonmystakingnowmakingmillions

#12 Absolute

Absolute

    The Greatest

  • Members
  • 3,459 posts

Posted 01 May 2005 - 05:25 PM

This sounds crazy, but raise the turn and fold to a cap.If he just calls your turn 3bet hell check the river.

#13

  • Guests

Posted 01 May 2005 - 05:42 PM

Absolute said:

This sounds crazy, but raise the turn and fold to a cap.If he just calls your turn 3bet hell check the river.
I can understand the 3-bet/fold to cap on the turn as it means he probably has you drawing dead. (I don't agree with this as there are a TON of horrible people at this level that are more than happy to cap this on the turn.)If you 3-bet, and he only calls, and the river looks harmless why check behind him? At this point the pot is pretty big and I think you're ahead more than 50% of the time to make the bet worth it.With that said, checking isn't horrible as there are a LOT of people that are also very weak and may think they're two pair may be no good in that position or have fancy play syndrome and try for a check/raise on the river. Without reads I think there is very little difference between them and I personally lean towards the more aggressive approach.Zara

#14 Emptyeye

Emptyeye

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,136 posts

Posted 01 May 2005 - 05:50 PM

Zarathustra said:

Absolute said:

This sounds crazy, but raise the turn and fold to a cap.If he just calls your turn 3bet hell check the river.
I can understand the 3-bet/fold to cap on the turn as it means he probably has you drawing dead. (I don't agree with this as there are a TON of horrible people at this level that are more than happy to cap this on the turn.)If you 3-bet, and he only calls, and the river looks harmless why check behind him? At this point the pot is pretty big and I think you're ahead more than 50% of the time to make the bet worth it.With that said, checking isn't horrible as there are a LOT of people that are also very weak and may think they're two pair may be no good in that position or have fancy play syndrome and try for a check/raise on the river. Without reads I think there is very little difference between them and I personally lean towards the more aggressive approach.Zara
I think what Absolute meant to say was "he'll (Meaning the opponent) check the river", not "Hell, check the river".APOSTROPHES, man! :D

#15 Absolute

Absolute

    The Greatest

  • Members
  • 3,459 posts

Posted 01 May 2005 - 06:04 PM

Zarathustra said:

Absolute said:

This sounds crazy, but raise the turn and fold to a cap.If he just calls your turn 3bet hell check the river.
I can understand the 3-bet/fold to cap on the turn as it means he probably has you drawing dead. (I don't agree with this as there are a TON of horrible people at this level that are more than happy to cap this on the turn.)If you 3-bet, and he only calls, and the river looks harmless why check behind him? At this point the pot is pretty big and I think you're ahead more than 50% of the time to make the bet worth it.With that said, checking isn't horrible as there are a LOT of people that are also very weak and may think they're two pair may be no good in that position or have fancy play syndrome and try for a check/raise on the river. Without reads I think there is very little difference between them and I personally lean towards the more aggressive approach.Zara
You think I would check behind on the river?Do I look like Corky from Life Goes On?

#16

  • Guests

Posted 01 May 2005 - 06:05 PM

Emptyeye said:

I think what Absolute meant to say was "he'll (Meaning the opponent) check the river", not "Hell, check the river".APOSTROPHES, man! :D
Hehe, I think you just might be right now that you mention that. :oops: If that's what is meant, then yes, I agree he'll check the river and I still think you should bet.Zara

#17 KDawgCometh

KDawgCometh

    old skool

  • Moderators
  • 15,163 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:the bebop
  • Interests:poker(duh), soccer, football, rugby, music, and film

Posted 01 May 2005 - 06:09 PM

Sorry Absolute, I'd call the cap aas we're getting odds to try to make 2 pair. Plus if another Ace comes then that's a good card fopr us too as it makes it less likely that they have an ace. But if it got capped I 'd fold to a river bet
Wine Notes for those that care about such pretentious things

#18 CobaltBlue

CobaltBlue

    Post-Apocalyptic Wanderer

  • Members
  • 9,167 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ft Lauderdale, FL
  • Favorite Poker Game:Hold 'Em, Crazy Pineapple, 2-7 TD

Posted 01 May 2005 - 06:59 PM

Custom36 said:

He had A-4.  I really don't understand the check/raise on the turn.
Just a guess, but he likely thought he'd sucked out your nines, tens, jacks, queens, or kings.

#19 Absolute

Absolute

    The Greatest

  • Members
  • 3,459 posts

Posted 01 May 2005 - 07:25 PM

Zarathustra said:

Emptyeye said:

I think what Absolute meant to say was "he'll (Meaning the opponent) check the river", not "Hell, check the river".APOSTROPHES, man! :D
Hehe, I think you just might be right now that you mention that. :oops: If that's what is meant, then yes, I agree he'll check the river and I still think you should bet.Zara
ive already clarified that this is what i meanthave i not

#20 Absolute

Absolute

    The Greatest

  • Members
  • 3,459 posts

Posted 01 May 2005 - 07:26 PM

KDawgCometh said:

Sorry Absolute, I'd call the cap aas we're getting odds to try to make 2 pair. Plus if another Ace comes then that's a good card fopr us too as it makes it less likely that they have an ace. But if it got capped I 'd fold to a river bet
i wont hold it against you that you are wrong




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users