The Hobbit
#1
Posted 18 December 2007 - 01:26 PM
Unfortunatley, it isn't coming out until 2010.
Any ideas what the sequel will be?
http://www.cinematical.com/2007/12/18/brea...t-and-a-sequel/
_____ That's what she said!
#2
Posted 18 December 2007 - 01:34 PM
#3
Posted 18 December 2007 - 01:39 PM
Also any word in whether Bilbo from LOTR would be the same Bilbo?
As for the sequel, I have no idea. I have read all three LOTR and the hobbit but those are the only works my Tolken I have read. I know they are some ansillary middle earth work he did, but I am not sure what they contained. Maybe they could be building off of that.
#4
Posted 18 December 2007 - 01:41 PM
Also any word in whether Bilbo from LOTR would be the same Bilbo?
As for the sequel, I have no idea. I have read all three LOTR and the hobbit but those are the only works my Tolken I have read. I know they are some ansillary middle earth work he did, but I am not sure what they contained. Maybe they could be building off of that.
Isn't that bilbo too old? Ian Holm-Bilbo from Lord of the Rings was born in 1931. They would probably want another actor to play Bilbo.
Here's another link.
_____ That's what she said!
#5
Posted 18 December 2007 - 01:43 PM
They could use parts of The Simillarion or whatever that follow up to the hobbit was. I really think the Hobbit can be done as a one time 2 1/2 to 3 hour movie. There is really no good spot to split apart the story.
#6
Posted 18 December 2007 - 02:01 PM
_____ That's what she said!
#7
Posted 18 December 2007 - 02:02 PM
Here's another link.
I had no idea he was that old. Wow he looks great for his age. I thought he was in his fifties. So considering the movies are 6 years old now, I would assume he is too old to play that part now. But since Frodo was supposed to 50ish when he took his journey, I do not think it needs to be a kid or young man to play the part. Anyone from mid 20's to 40 could work.
#8
Posted 18 December 2007 - 02:03 PM
Yes and strangley enough I knew what you were trying to say, but with off chance you were talking about hobbies.
#9
Posted 18 December 2007 - 02:12 PM
Ya I agree, it needs to be a 2.5-3hr movie by itself. From my understanding the Simillarion (Sp?) is kind of like the bible of middle earth. It's not really a story as it is the tales of how it all began to how it ended. Perhaps it covers some ground between The Hobbit & LOTR although I'm not sure as I've never read it. I know Tolkien never finished The Simillarion as he was writing it throughout his life, I believe his son did.
Regardless, if Peter Jackson is producing it I think it's safe to say it'll be a gem.
#10
Posted 18 December 2007 - 02:15 PM
Fixed your prob
#11
Posted 18 December 2007 - 02:19 PM
Regardless, if Peter Jackson is producing it I think it's safe to say it'll be a gem.
This is how I understand a lot of Tolkens other middle earth stuff, that it was more of a road map and history or anthology than a story. Plus didn't he create and entire elvish language?
#12
Posted 18 December 2007 - 02:22 PM
Yea he basically created his own world, he's like the Godfather of Fantasy.
#13
Posted 18 December 2007 - 02:26 PM
Regardless, if Peter Jackson is producing it I think it's safe to say it'll be a gem.
Thats a fairly accurate representation of it, but there is stuff they can pull from to make a story or extend the Hobbit I suppose.
Peter Jackson is producing, he isn't signed on to direct it yet.... which makes me wonder if he is going to.
#14
Posted 18 December 2007 - 03:10 PM
I remember hearing a long time ago, before the movie was confirmed, that he didn't want to direct it. I really hope he does though, just so he can redeem himself after he destroyed Kong.
Make love to a real woman.
#15
Posted 18 December 2007 - 03:24 PM
I don't know if he did that, or Jack Black
#16
Posted 18 December 2007 - 04:02 PM
Kong is a dumb story to begin with, so I don't know what miracle you were expecting him to pull off.
#17
Posted 18 December 2007 - 05:25 PM
I'll go with the former on this one.
Anytime you have a movie about a giant beast, it shouldn't take an hour and a half to finally get to said giant beast.
Make love to a real woman.
#18
Posted 18 December 2007 - 06:40 PM
I love you.
Anytime you have a movie about a giant beast, it shouldn't take an hour and a half to finally get to said giant beast.
I agree. I was kind of thinking the same thing durin Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End because it took over 40 minutes for Jack Sparrow to appear.
_____ That's what she said!
#19
Posted 18 December 2007 - 06:53 PM
That movie sucked for a lot of reasons, that wasn't one of them.
#20
Posted 18 December 2007 - 07:45 PM
Concur. Boy did that movie suck.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









