we have AA, who'd wanna fold?
(sw)
If you c/r, it's not for information, it's for value. That's the key concept. Nobody's saying that if you get 3-bet that it isn't time to fold. The idea is that when you do choose to c/r, it should be because you're pretty sure you've got the best hand, not becuase you're unsure if you've got the best hand or not.
I disagree, Who says a c/r should only be used for value? Obviously thats what most people use it for, but why should you eliminate it from your arsenal just because its usually used as a way to extract value.
Too many people are too concerned with playing their hand a certain way, when they should be asking what does villain hold in his range that I beat, what beats me, what does he think I have that he beats, and when will I know when i'm beat, or when will I know I'm still ahead.
You guys have told him what not too do, and what to do preflop and as 1st to act on the flop.But no one has finished the hand.
My guess is he leads out 25, villain raise to 60 (maybe he wuld raise more) and do we fold now? You would say No, you would 3-bet all in. How is this line optimal?
If its aces vs kings, then he probably should have got them all in preflop somehow. especially for stacks of 100bb's or less. thats the only thing i can think of that makes more sense.