Worst Sharkscope Ever?
#1
Posted 28 November 2007 - 05:24 PM
-479k. Ouch.
#2
Posted 28 November 2007 - 05:28 PM
Nemo213 or something is supposed to be pretty bad too, search him

Baller
#3
Posted 28 November 2007 - 09:31 PM
#5
Posted 28 November 2007 - 09:41 PM
Tom.
EStormOk: You people sure do bitch a lot. I didn't think it was that bad. I guess I am just clueless. I'll try to bitch more in the future.
Lurbz: You must be new here
#6
Posted 28 November 2007 - 09:43 PM
Tom.
Probably as cold as it is in New Berlin
#7
Posted 28 November 2007 - 09:44 PM
KidPoker 7 -$547 $1,058 -3% -$3,832 - PokerStars
#8
Posted 28 November 2007 - 09:50 PM
I don't sports bet much, i'm not very good at it. But good luck. I'm sticking to fantasy football, I made the playoffs in my league, and i'm hoping to take home a few bucks from that.
Tom.
P.S. My sharkscope sucks balls. mr_druid on Full Tilt. Probably a good thing I am suspended from there. Roomie has a ROI of 11%, makes me look like the sng black sheep of the household.
EStormOk: You people sure do bitch a lot. I didn't think it was that bad. I guess I am just clueless. I'll try to bitch more in the future.
Lurbz: You must be new here
#9
Posted 28 November 2007 - 09:55 PM
If I could give u a little betting insight. Dont bet with your heart. If you are going to take the packers, take the points cause it could be close. The Packers are good(god i hate saying that as a bears fan) but they really havent beaten good teams like the cowboys have. I am predicting the cowboys win by 10. Close game pack down by 3 and driving and Favre gets picked for six and the cowboys cover. And oh yea, I went to school with Romo so I will be sporting the jersey tomorrow at the local tavern.
GO BOYS!!
#10
Posted 28 November 2007 - 10:09 PM
LMAO. Thanks buddy. It's not that the Packers are 10-1 against the spread, and obv. the money line this year.
Packers have made me thousands this season. Sorry for the brag, but it's more than just betting with my heart. To get a team that is 10-1 at +220 no matter who it is, is a good bet. IMO, they should be no more than +175.
#11
Posted 28 November 2007 - 10:53 PM
acescraps 888 -$96 $222 -42% -$85,565 Tilt PokerStars x
#12
Posted 29 November 2007 - 04:49 AM
[/quote]
It's Nemo234...unreal
#13
Posted 29 November 2007 - 07:00 AM
It's Nemo234...unreal
Wow. Just wow.
Nemo234:



#14
Posted 29 November 2007 - 07:03 AM
-479k. Ouch.
I saw him win the $100r then played with him in a tourney the next night... someone called him on his sharkscope numbers and his response was classic:
"Yeah, I sit and go"
#15
Posted 29 November 2007 - 08:31 AM
and im somehow +200
I guess Ive lost my money in cash games and MTTs
#16
Posted 29 November 2007 - 09:19 AM
#17
Posted 29 November 2007 - 09:26 AM
Nemo234:

Is it true? That amount of money and he's never been ahead? Not once. Not for a minute? Or is this just a snapshot?
#18
Posted 29 November 2007 - 09:46 AM
2nd Episode is up! See my sound man go down. Sorry buddy.
3rd Episode is up! This is just wrong and should be banned from teh internets!
#19
Posted 29 November 2007 - 01:12 PM

Wow , thats 1 sick graph
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











