profit from the blinds?
Started by rog, Apr 28 2005 07:32 AM
11 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 28 April 2005 - 07:32 AM
According to pokertracker, I am down a bit from each of the blinds, but if you subtract the cost of the blinds from my losses, I'm actually up. Should I be able to recoup my blinds on average fromt he blinds, or should I just be happy I'm not losing more than my blinds on average from 1st and 2nd chair? Those of you with large databases, how do you do from the blinds?
#2
Posted 28 April 2005 - 08:17 AM
My assumption is that most people lose money from the blinds. The goal is to lose as little as possible. You are being forced to play the pot, out of position, with any two cards. This can't be +EV. Limiting your losses by folding trash in the small blind and only occasionally defending against steal attempts seem to be the most effective ways to limit the damage.
#3
Posted 28 April 2005 - 12:01 PM
You're going to lose from the blinds no matter what.How much are you losing(BB/100)?
back for kramit
#4
Posted 28 April 2005 - 12:07 PM
I'm losing around 2BB/100 from the blinds. That seems atrocious. The SB isn't bad, but the BB is killing me. You would think they'd be somewhat proportionate, but it isn't close.Maybe I'm calling raises too loosely from the BB. I'll have to check it out.
#5
Posted 28 April 2005 - 12:14 PM
Maybe.You're losing 2BB/100 from the BB? (Just to clear things up)
back for kramit
#6
Posted 28 April 2005 - 12:21 PM
wrto4556 said:
Maybe.You're losing 2BB/100 from the BB? (Just to clear things up)
#7
Posted 28 April 2005 - 12:32 PM
Well, this is a meaningless sample size, but it's still a little disconcerting that I'm hemhorraging money like this from the BB. Look at the net results of those hands that I've played....that's UGLY!
#8
Posted 28 April 2005 - 12:37 PM
I think the sample size actually has a lot to do with your BB problem.In 9K more hand I am sure it won't look as bad.
#9
Posted 28 April 2005 - 12:51 PM
here's 3800 more hands... they're seperate because they were played on a different site. (these are $.25/.50 rather than $.50/$1.00)
#10
Posted 28 April 2005 - 12:54 PM
BetItAll33 said:
Well, this is a meaningless sample size, but it's still a little disconcerting that I'm hemhorraging money like this from the BB. Look at the net results of those hands that I've played....that's UGLY!
#11
Posted 28 April 2005 - 01:07 PM
I think you make some valid points, but it's also due, in part, to sample size. I went through those hands and found some downright ugly hands, such as:Party Poker 0.5/1 Hold'em (9 handed) converterPreflop: Hero is BB with 9c, 8c. UTG raises, Hero calls.Why? I don't know. I suppose I thought I could get cute with a suited connector. Brilliant play in a heads up pot, I know. WRTO probably 3-bets, that aggressive mofo! /swFlop: (4.50 SB) 2d, Td, 9h (2 players)Hero bets, Hero calls.This flop seems as good as any, let's lead out! Turn: (4.25 BB) 5h (2 players)Hero checks, UTG bets, Hero calls.Now I'm pretty sure I'm beat, but call him down anyways. River: (6.25 BB) 6s (2 players)Hero checks, UTG bets, Hero calls.Final Pot: 8.25 BBWho likes my play? .... anybody? didn't think so.
#12
Posted 28 April 2005 - 01:10 PM
oh and you're absolutely right about posting too many BB's. I'm in the habit of sitting at a table for about 40 hands, then when I see that the vpip is around 18% I get the hell out of there.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









