Jump to content


when to go for overcalls


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

#1 wrto4556

wrto4556

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,418 posts

Posted 27 April 2005 - 08:20 PM

I seen a few posts where people are talking about going for overcalls. So, I decided to post something, well, because im bored.Going for overcalls shouldn't happen very often. Most of the time when you are in a hand you should be betting and/or raising. Cold calling preflop is bad most of the time, check/calling is bad most of the time, and calling behind a better when you have a strong hand is bad most of the time.A player should tend to go for overcalls when:a) He is not sure he has the original bettor beat andB) He is sure he has everone else behind him beat.This is the most common scenario to go for overcalls. Also, if you think the bettor is bluffing and will not call a raise and you have people to act behind you that are loose/passive, you should just call and let all the other, unsophisticated players come in. The pot has to be small for this to work, but in bigger pots we should play aggressive.There are a few examples of when to go for overcalls in SSHE but they are far from prime. One is decent. It says when you have a one card straight and someone bets into you you should call as long as there are a loose player(s) to act behind you.This whole concept comes from the fact that you have to be good 2/3 of the time to raise a river. If someone bets and you *think* you have the best, if you raise you could get 3-bet. So, by raising you win 2 when you are ahead but lose 3 when you are behind. Therefore, you have to have the best hand 2/3 of the time to make raising correct. Well, if you aren't sure if you have the bettor beat 2/3 of the time and you have people to act behind you, you should go for overcalls. You don't have to have the best hand nearly as much.Say you have AJ and the final board is T8972® and someone in early position bets into you. You have 4 people to act behind you who are all loose/passive players. If you raise, you make 2 bets when you are ahead (or you split, which cuts into your win percent) and lose 3 when you are behind. But, if you just call, you lose 1 when you are behind and win 1-5 when you are ahead. Clearly you can see the benefits to calling instead of raising with the straight even if you believe to be best more than 2/3 of the time.To continue, overcalls happen most frequently on the river. If you have a good hand(especially on the fop) you should raise even if you think you will get 3-bet. You drive out opponents and increase your chance to win the pot.
back for kramit

#2 wrto4556

wrto4556

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,418 posts

Posted 27 April 2005 - 09:39 PM

Whiffed?
back for kramit

#3 Absolute

Absolute

    The Greatest

  • Members
  • 3,459 posts

Posted 27 April 2005 - 09:40 PM

strike one

#4 obs

obs

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 276 posts
  • Location:3/6

Posted 27 April 2005 - 10:04 PM

What about on the turn when you hit your monster, are bet into on your immediate right, and have 2-4 people to act behind you. Like you hit your nut flush or straight on the turn and the pot is small (4-6BB).

#5 wrto4556

wrto4556

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,418 posts

Posted 27 April 2005 - 10:09 PM

When the pot is small, it's correct.
back for kramit

#6 Vade

Vade

    Forum Shopkeeper

  • Members
  • 3,864 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee, WI
  • Interests:Poker, Sports, Movies

Posted 27 April 2005 - 10:10 PM

I like it, though it is a relatively rarely used piece of strat

#7 DKE_XP120

DKE_XP120

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,280 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pittsburgh, PA
  • Interests:Poker, Video Games, Eating, Sleeping

Posted 27 April 2005 - 10:25 PM

Shouldnt this be in your strategy blog... which has been updated about as recently as your life blog.. way to be a slacker

#8 allinbluff35

allinbluff35

    Inevitably Running Bad

  • Members
  • 9,505 posts
  • Location:The Land Of Busto.

Posted 27 April 2005 - 10:27 PM

DKE_XP120 said:

Shouldnt this be in your strategy blog... which has been updated about as recently as your life blog.. way to be a slacker
he's been smoking a lot of pole lately
Only after you have lost everything, are you free to do anything.


Sign Up For RakeBack Here.

#9 Absolute

Absolute

    The Greatest

  • Members
  • 3,459 posts

Posted 27 April 2005 - 10:30 PM

DKE_XP120 said:

Shouldnt this be in your strategy blog... which has been updated about as recently as your life blog.. way to be a slacker
life blog?thats the funniest shit ive heard in a whilei cant imagine reading anyones life blogsometimes i read daniels journal and start to feel weirdif weird = gay

#10 DKE_XP120

DKE_XP120

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,280 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pittsburgh, PA
  • Interests:Poker, Video Games, Eating, Sleeping

Posted 27 April 2005 - 10:30 PM

allinbluff35 said:

DKE_XP120 said:

Shouldnt this be in your strategy blog... which has been updated about as recently as your life blog.. way to be a slacker
he's been smoking a lot of pole lately
At least i'm clued in on the life part,,,, what about the strategy

#11 DKE_XP120

DKE_XP120

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,280 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pittsburgh, PA
  • Interests:Poker, Video Games, Eating, Sleeping

Posted 27 April 2005 - 10:35 PM

Absolute said:

DKE_XP120 said:

Shouldnt this be in your strategy blog... which has been updated about as recently as your life blog.. way to be a slacker
life blog?thats the funniest censored ive heard in a whilei cant imagine reading anyones life blogsometimes i read daniels journal and start to feel weirdif weird = gay
More or less poker life, not like, I went swimming today, though I beleive he's talked about it before :oops:

#12 wrto4556

wrto4556

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,418 posts

Posted 27 April 2005 - 10:59 PM

DKE_XP120 said:

Shouldnt this be in your strategy blog... which has been updated about as recently as your life blog.. way to be a slacker
I might delete those. I really don't have the time to update them. Actually, I do. :-) Im just a slacker when it comes to things that aren't directly related to poker.I might keep the strat one up....who knows.
back for kramit

#13 BeanGW

BeanGW

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,480 posts
  • Location:Movin on up... to the East Side
  • Interests:Women, booze, and gambling

Posted 28 April 2005 - 07:10 AM

WRTO: This is awesome stuff. Just wanted to say thanks!

#14 srblan

srblan

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 555 posts

Posted 28 April 2005 - 08:13 AM

Nice post. A little to add. One of the most common mistakes that people make overcalling is calling when they know that they can beat the original raiser, but they are not sure they can beat everyone else. If you have a weak hand that you know can beat the aggressor, but probably can't beat another player in the hand, get out. Sometimes you will fold the winner, but you will much more frequently just be a donor.

#15 KDawgCometh

KDawgCometh

    old skool

  • Moderators
  • 15,163 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:the bebop
  • Interests:poker(duh), soccer, football, rugby, music, and film

Posted 28 April 2005 - 10:13 AM

wrto4556 said:

DKE_XP120 said:

Shouldnt this be in your strategy blog... which has been updated about as recently as your life blog.. way to be a slacker
I might delete those. I really don't have the time to update them. Actually, I do. :-) Im just a slacker when it comes to things that aren't directly related to poker.I might keep the strat one up....who knows.
yeah, I've gotten lazy on it too :D
Wine Notes for those that care about such pretentious things

#16 Absolute

Absolute

    The Greatest

  • Members
  • 3,459 posts

Posted 28 April 2005 - 10:14 AM

KDawgCometh said:

wrto4556 said:

DKE_XP120 said:

Shouldnt this be in your strategy blog... which has been updated about as recently as your life blog.. way to be a slacker
I might delete those. I really don't have the time to update them. Actually, I do. :-) Im just a slacker when it comes to things that aren't directly related to poker.I might keep the strat one up....who knows.
yeah, I've gotten lazy on it too :D
just tell me you dont have one of those "life blogs" keith

#17 KDawgCometh

KDawgCometh

    old skool

  • Moderators
  • 15,163 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:the bebop
  • Interests:poker(duh), soccer, football, rugby, music, and film

Posted 28 April 2005 - 10:39 AM

naw, cause I only have a shell of a life. THere's not much more for me to say, I woke up, played poker for three to four hours, watched TV, played some more poker, and then went out to the bars, or Xperson's house, went home checked FCP&2+2 and went to sleep. not exactly exciting stuff
Wine Notes for those that care about such pretentious things

#18 Absolute

Absolute

    The Greatest

  • Members
  • 3,459 posts

Posted 28 April 2005 - 10:43 AM

KDawgCometh said:

naw, cause I only have a shell of a life. THere's not much more for me to say, I woke up, played poker for three to four hours, watched TV, played some more poker, and then went out to the bars, or Xperson's house, went home checked FCP&2+2 and went to sleep. not exactly exciting stuff
what about the lucky mrs. kdawg

#19 KDawgCometh

KDawgCometh

    old skool

  • Moderators
  • 15,163 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:the bebop
  • Interests:poker(duh), soccer, football, rugby, music, and film

Posted 28 April 2005 - 10:50 AM

Absolute said:

KDawgCometh said:

naw, cause I only have a shell of a life. THere's not much more for me to say, I woke up, played poker for three to four hours, watched TV, played some more poker, and then went out to the bars, or Xperson's house, went home checked FCP&2+2 and went to sleep. not exactly exciting stuff
what about the lucky mrs. kdawg
you mean the one that's attached to my wrist?, she's good. I have had a bad go at love in life, much of it my own doing. NOthing ever of more then a night or two. The past five years I had a job in which I didn't really want a decent girl to have involvement for her own safety. if you connect the dots then It wouldn't be too hard to figure out what that "job" might've been. BTW, I was definetly no small timer either with said job
Wine Notes for those that care about such pretentious things

#20 allinbluff35

allinbluff35

    Inevitably Running Bad

  • Members
  • 9,505 posts
  • Location:The Land Of Busto.

Posted 28 April 2005 - 02:03 PM

you mean the one that's attached to my wrist?, she's good. I have had a bad go at love in life, much of it my own doing. NOthing ever of more then a night or two. The past five years I had a job in which I didn't really want a decent girl to have involvement for her own safety. if you connect the dots then It wouldn't be too hard to figure out what that "job" might've been. BTW, I was definetly no small timer either with said jobslinging it
Only after you have lost everything, are you free to do anything.


Sign Up For RakeBack Here.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users