Posted 08 December 2004 - 10:59 AM
It seems many responses to this topic are trying to persuade that online poker is not random because more bad beats take place. That is simply ridiculous. The designers of the software know precisely what they are doing in order to make it simulate an actual deck. I can guarentee that is is more random then a live game where you can only rely on the dealer's shuffle.Furthermore, more "bad beats" seem to happen because you see an outrageously more number of hands online then you do live. This is what attracts most of you to online games anyway, that you can play multiple tables and come across more situations. So ofcourse, with more situations, you will see more "bad beats."My only advice is that a lot of people are playing poker with the wrong style. I mean that the recurring theme in online play is for people to just play their own hand and when that gets beat, then its bad luck. Poker is more than just the cards and the odds, but when you play multiple tables, that's all you get. You can never say with certainty that when you have A K and you get a K on the flop that you should move in or reraise a bet. It is a game that is always dependent on the situation. You can never generalize your competition no matter if your table is made of fish because some fish are weak/tight and some are very aggressive. What I'm getting at is this: in order to maximize your profits and your win rate at the table, you have to factor in everything ranging from your opponent's styles, your position, how they have bet in the past, and so much more that I think it is absurd to ever believe playing multiple tables is the right way to play poker and it is also absurd to believe in bad beats online when you are only really concentrating on just your hand.By the way, I play live because I am doing my best to improve my game and gain experience in every aspect of this great game. However, I do think online is a great medium for trying out new strategies and recognizing recurring scenarios. I just have problems with people complaining about so called bad beats and also discussing how playing multiple tables is a good way to play poker.One final comment, Mike Caro wrote this great article for Cardplayer magazine and I think his statement fits in well here..."As I’ve said many times, there’s nothing wrong with a wagering game involving pairs, straights, flushes, and full houses that is played in silence. Just don’t call it 'poker.' That name is already taken." -Mike Caro