Snamuh 0 Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 Villain is 51/17/2.3 after about 100 hands. This has to be a set right?PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)MP ($103.05)Hero ($127.35)Button ($93.50)SB ($90.95)BB ($233.55)UTG ($101.20)Preflop: Hero is CO with A, Q. 2 folds, Hero raises to $4, 1 fold, SB calls $3.50, BB calls $3.Flop: ($12) 6, Q, 4(3 players)SB checks, BB bets $3, Hero raises to $10, SB folds, BB calls $7.Turn: ($32) 6(2 players)BB checks, Hero bets $22, BB raises to $55, Hero? Link to post Share on other sites
shinzilla 0 Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 Villain has taken a very, very strong line. This really looks like pocket 4's to me. Link to post Share on other sites
danc1984 0 Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 Yeah you gotta let it go. You just don't beat anything. The very least you are repping is AQ. Link to post Share on other sites
Snamuh 0 Posted October 17, 2007 Author Share Posted October 17, 2007 Villain has taken a very, very strong line. This really looks like pocket 4's to me.That's actually what I said in chat when I folded but my real question is whether the LAG tendencies of the villain changes your thought process or do you always just assume you are beaten by this line. Link to post Share on other sites
danc1984 0 Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 That's actually what I said in chat when I folded but my real question is whether the LAG tendencies of the villain changes your thought process or do you always just assume you are beaten by this line.Isn't his post flop agg. factor 2.3? This isn't ridiculously laggy is it? The villain would have to be superlag for me to think I am good enough here. Link to post Share on other sites
shinzilla 0 Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 Isn't his post flop agg. factor 2.3? This isn't ridiculously laggy is it? The villain would have to be superlag for me to think I am good enough here.That's not ridiculously laggy. In fact, I think it's less than optimal. I wouldn't call this villain a LAG; preflop, he's very loose but his aggression factor isn't crazy at all.As to the question whether we'd fold this every time, obviously it'd be dumb to fold this every single time. Without prior history that indicates that villain is capable of pulling off bluffs like this, however, I think we have to give him the benefit of the doubt and let it go here. You'd have to take the flow of the game into consideration in decisions like these. Obviously if villain is splashing around in a lot of pots, I'd probably go all the way in the hand in this situation. But with an aggression factor of only 2.3 and no indication that villain can pull off a bluff, just drop the hand. Link to post Share on other sites
mtdesmoines 2 Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 Villain is 51/17/2.3 after about 100 hands. This has to be a set right?PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)MP ($103.05)Hero ($127.35)Button ($93.50)SB ($90.95)BB ($233.55)UTG ($101.20)Preflop: Hero is CO with A, Q. 2 folds, Hero raises to $4, 1 fold, SB calls $3.50, BB calls $3.Flop: ($12) 6, Q, 4(3 players)SB checks, BB bets $3, Hero raises to $10, SB folds, BB calls $7.Turn: ($32) 6(2 players)BB checks, Hero bets $22, BB raises to $55, Hero?This top two pair, top kicker really sucks. Villain sees the board. Only thing you're beating is a "bluff." Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now