No_Neck 0 Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 Poker StarsNo Limit Holdem Ring gameBlinds: $0.25/$0.506 playersConverterStack sizes:UTG: $15.15UTG+1: $107.80CO: $59.40Button: $87.75Hero: $125.80BB: $48.75Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is SB with A 2 UTG calls, 2 folds, Button raises to $1, Hero calls, BB folds, UTG calls.Flop: Q J T ($3.5, 3 players)Hero checks, UTG bets $1, Button raises to $4, Hero raises to $17.5, UTG folds, Button raises to $31Villian is an aggro donkey like 70/40/3 or something like that Link to post Share on other sites
Naismith 0 Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 Once you've gotten to this point, shovel shovel shovel. Link to post Share on other sites
No_Neck 0 Posted October 8, 2007 Author Share Posted October 8, 2007 Once you've gotten to this point, shovel shovel shovel.you just call the buttons raise to $4? Link to post Share on other sites
NoBBiR 0 Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 Once you've gotten to this point, shovel shovel shovel.At this point, I agree. He doesn't necessarily have the nuts at this point and might not put in his last $50 if you shove if he has say, TTP or 89.you just call the buttons raise to $4?Just call the raise to $4 for the most part. It advertises your hand, but you don't get in these gay situations. Link to post Share on other sites
Naismith 0 Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 you just call the buttons raise to $4?Not necessarily.I'm just saying if I played it as such to this point, I'm getting it all gassed. Link to post Share on other sites
Acid_Knight 2 Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 I'd have just called on the flop. Your draws are totally transparent and aren't likely to get paid if you hit.That said, if you think you have FE, go for it and shovel. Link to post Share on other sites
Naismith 0 Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 I'd have just called on the flop. Your draws are totally transparent and aren't likely to get paid if you hit.That said, if you think you have FE, go for it and shovel.At this point, FE is just bonus. We likely have 11 outs minimum to the nutzzzzzzz. Link to post Share on other sites
Acid_Knight 2 Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 At this point, FE is just bonus. We likely have 11 outs minimum to the nutzzzzzzz.Wouldn't it suck if the villain shows up with KQss? Link to post Share on other sites
Naismith 0 Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 Wouldn't it suck if the villain shows up with KQss?We just suckout if he has KQss. Link to post Share on other sites
whiterice714 0 Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 We just suckout if he has KQss.yeahthis game's easy=] Link to post Share on other sites
Roberts2003 0 Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 i would usually just call the flop raise unless you think you have a tight enough image to get him to fold. personally, i usually have such a shitty image that this kind of play would rarely work. Link to post Share on other sites
Acid_Knight 2 Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 i would usually just call the flop raise unless you think you have a tight enough image to get him to fold. personally, i usually have such a shitty image that this kind of play would rarely work.Shitty image to get people to fold, amazingly awesome image to get people to stack off with 1 pair. There's always a bright side you know. Link to post Share on other sites
Acid_Knight 2 Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 We just suckout if he has KQss.I have so much to learn from you. Link to post Share on other sites
No_Neck 0 Posted October 8, 2007 Author Share Posted October 8, 2007 Wouldn't it suck if the villain shows up with AKo?yeah it would... and he did, but he is noooo match for riverstars I think I should have just called the $4. Link to post Share on other sites
Acid_Knight 2 Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 yeah it would... and he did, but he is noooo match for riverstars I think I should have just called the $4.If he has KQss, we're a 65% to 34% dog and we tie 1% of the time.If he has AKo with no spade, we're gonna win 36.4% to his 56.7% and tie 7% of the time.If he has AK with one spade, which is the worst case, we're only gonna win 32.6% to his 56.77% and tie 10.6%.So, AKo with no spade is actually better for him to have than KQss as far as we're concerned. Link to post Share on other sites
krup24 0 Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 I think I should have just called the $4.results oriented thinking, i like the shove and there is FE all be it small but wait maybe thats results oriented thinking as well Link to post Share on other sites
Acid_Knight 2 Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 results oriented thinking, i like the shove and there is FE all be it small but wait maybe thats results oriented thinking as wellWith that many bets and raises back and forth, the Villain almost always has one of the following few hands that he'll never fold:Combo drawTwo PairSetStraightObv it's results oriented because we see that he's reraising after we 3-betthe flop, but you never have FE here if you shove. Link to post Share on other sites
Gene zzz 0 Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 Call the 31 your chances of the flush are greater then his stack; seeing the turn for that little is great he is nearly allout and you have plenty of earned coverage to use nothing to fear in taking these odds all the other hands don't matter because you can get a check from him on the next round or have the flush and break him. You make the flush enough not to have to worry over the board pairing when you can see card for card the next two rounds ;if a card dups and he bet out you can fold. Him having 2 pair now or three of a kind leave you with outs against you but him drawing the same and the many other hands he may have give you an easy call the odds he is making for himself in those cases are also good enough for you to continue play. Going all in is not correct he won't fold enough and if he is bluffing he put in to many chips already. Link to post Share on other sites
Roberts2003 0 Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 Shitty image to get people to fold, amazingly awesome image to get people to stack off with 1 pair. There's always a bright side you know.hahaha yes this is true as well. Link to post Share on other sites
Acid_Knight 2 Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 Call the 31 your chances of the flush are greater then his stack; seeing the turn for that little is great he is nearly allout and you have plenty of earned coverage to use nothing to fear in taking these odds all the other hands don't matter because you can get a check from him on the next round or have the flush and break him. You make the flush enough not to have to worry over the board pairing when you can see card for card the next two rounds ;if a card dups and he bet out you can fold. Him having 2 pair now or three of a kind leave you with outs against you but him drawing the same and the many other hands he may have give you an easy call the odds he is making for himself in those cases are also good enough for you to continue play. Going all in is not correct he won't fold enough and if he is bluffing he put in to many chips already.zach i swear to god youd ban me if i posted stuff like this lacking punctuation not making sense who says periods and commas and everything. are important cause you can just stick them in? where ever and let everyone else sort it out I really/ think this guy has got some kind of mental issues or learn disablety and i shud start speling bad now cuz he does that too a little.I'm a bad person. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now