Jump to content


pokertracker review of stats


  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

#1 wisky_VI

wisky_VI

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 556 posts
  • Location:Badgerland
  • Interests:poker, cigars, hunting, golf, fishing
  • Favorite Poker Game:2-7 Triple Draw

Posted 26 April 2005 - 07:12 AM

Though I'm only up to 1400 hands if anyone uses Pokerroom or Paradise I'm willing to transfer ___ dollars for your review of my stat's. Actually I have Netteller money as well if needed.PM me or email wiskyvi@gmail.comIf pokerschools were closer I would certainly enroll and really try to learn some more and work on my faults but alas Wisconsin isn't prime territory.I am reading SS2 and have read SS1, plus have a couple other books waiting to read.

#2 BetItAll33

BetItAll33

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 453 posts
  • Location:midwest, USA

Posted 26 April 2005 - 07:31 AM

Why don't you just post some of the stats here? You'll get plenty of opinions from good players.

#3 wisky_VI

wisky_VI

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 556 posts
  • Location:Badgerland
  • Interests:poker, cigars, hunting, golf, fishing
  • Favorite Poker Game:2-7 Triple Draw

Posted 26 April 2005 - 08:00 AM

I'm more worried about restraining my mouth(fingers)from flamers. People typing tough stuff on the net versus in person tends to annoy me but hey what can it hurt....conversly i love to tilt people on chat while playing online !!! hehehe

#4 BetItAll33

BetItAll33

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 453 posts
  • Location:midwest, USA

Posted 26 April 2005 - 08:12 AM

don't sweat the flamers... most of them don't linger around the strategy section or bother with pokertracker posts. However, don't be surprised if you are criticized and ridiculed for bad play. That's just a rite of passage around here.

#5 wisky_VI

wisky_VI

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 556 posts
  • Location:Badgerland
  • Interests:poker, cigars, hunting, golf, fishing
  • Favorite Poker Game:2-7 Triple Draw

Posted 26 April 2005 - 08:19 AM

that part i understand completely.now I need to figure out how others got those screen shots cut-n-pasted of the important stats !! duh ! :oops:

#6 BetItAll33

BetItAll33

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 453 posts
  • Location:midwest, USA

Posted 26 April 2005 - 08:28 AM

wisky_VI said:

that part i understand completely.now I need to figure out how others got those screen shots cut-n-pasted of the important stats !! duh ! :oops:
well, actually that's not so simple. You can copy a screenshot to the clipboard by pressing alt-print screen. Then you can paste the image into a photo editing program. Then comes the tough part... you have to upload the image to the web; you have to have web space or use a picture sharing service or something like that. If you want to email me the images, I could do that part of it for you, then provide you with links. Betitall@hotmail.com.good luck.

#7 wisky_VI

wisky_VI

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 556 posts
  • Location:Badgerland
  • Interests:poker, cigars, hunting, golf, fishing
  • Favorite Poker Game:2-7 Triple Draw

Posted 26 April 2005 - 08:32 AM

jokes..err...files on the way. :D

#8 BetItAll33

BetItAll33

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 453 posts
  • Location:midwest, USA

Posted 26 April 2005 - 08:55 AM

OK Whiskey, here are your stats. Let the flames begin!Posted Image

#9 Vade

Vade

    Forum Shopkeeper

  • Members
  • 3,864 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee, WI
  • Interests:Poker, Sports, Movies

Posted 26 April 2005 - 09:01 AM

Where's stuff like agro factor? That's important as is call percentages.Well, I don't know how you're winning money, cause 57% VP$IP?!?!That's insane man, and 85% calling from the small blind.62% flops seen is at least twice the ideal also. You my friend are a fish :D

#10 cdddc75

cdddc75

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,780 posts
  • Location:Portland

Posted 26 April 2005 - 09:08 AM

I'd like to know the aggro factor as well.I would question the OP's ability to sustain any sort of win rate with that VP$IP. I can see winning a bunch over 1,500 hands with that VP$IP, but this smells like a crash and burn waiting to happen.Not trying to flame here...just sounding a caution.

#11 Whatever

Whatever

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,694 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:McAllen, Tx

Posted 26 April 2005 - 09:09 AM

You play limit?

#12 BetItAll33

BetItAll33

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 453 posts
  • Location:midwest, USA

Posted 26 April 2005 - 09:11 AM

just to be clear, are you playing limit, or no limit? It looks like $.50/$1, but can you clear that up?You play TOO MANY HANDS. Just curious, what sort of hand would you fold preflop?

#13 wisky_VI

wisky_VI

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 556 posts
  • Location:Badgerland
  • Interests:poker, cigars, hunting, golf, fishing
  • Favorite Poker Game:2-7 Triple Draw

Posted 26 April 2005 - 09:28 AM

ok on the fish part, i posted for advice not to say hey i'm the best. flame on but put in advice or constructive criticism with the pain. Thanks.i play only NL.aggr got cutoff for some reason ?preflop .45flop 3.19turn 2.35river 1.44total 1.09

#14 cdddc75

cdddc75

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,780 posts
  • Location:Portland

Posted 26 April 2005 - 09:36 AM

From your stats, I think your success is due to one (or both) of the following:1. You are a wizard at postflop play.2. Your cards have run well so far and your results are significantly better than the expected value of the cards you play.I hope you understand why voluntarily playing 57% of your hands is a losing proposition in the long run.

#15 wisky_VI

wisky_VI

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 556 posts
  • Location:Badgerland
  • Interests:poker, cigars, hunting, golf, fishing
  • Favorite Poker Game:2-7 Triple Draw

Posted 26 April 2005 - 09:46 AM

cdddc75 said:

From your stats, I think your success is due to one (or both) of the following:1. You are a wizard at postflop play.2. Your cards have run well so far and your results are significantly better than the expected value of the cards you play.I hope you understand why voluntarily playing 57% of your hands is a losing proposition in the long run.
******* Please be advised I am not happy with the results and want outside reinforcement/advice on fixing my huge leaks. This was posted with me thinking my play sucks !My only advantage probably at this time is playing a limit far below my bankroll level hence taking risks does not faze me. In the long run I realize this will not work if I want to play larger limits.

#16 cdddc75

cdddc75

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,780 posts
  • Location:Portland

Posted 26 April 2005 - 10:03 AM

wisky_VI said:

cdddc75 said:

From your stats, I think your success is due to one (or both) of the following:1. You are a wizard at postflop play.2. Your cards have run well so far and your results are significantly better than the expected value of the cards you play.I hope you understand why voluntarily playing 57% of your hands is a losing proposition in the long run.
******* Please be advised I am not happy with the results and want outside reinforcement/advice on fixing my huge leaks. This was posted with me thinking my play sucks !My only advantage probably at this time is playing a limit far below my bankroll level hence taking risks does not faze me. In the long run I realize this will not work if I want to play larger limits.
Your results are actually well above average. Kudos to you for realizing that your game has leaks while your results do not show them. NLHE cash games aren't my expertise, so I don't have much to add other than hand selection. It seems to me that you are playing at least twice as many hands as you should.

#17 wrto4556

wrto4556

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,418 posts

Posted 26 April 2005 - 01:16 PM

Fold more. Alot more.
back for kramit

#18 JaysonWeber

JaysonWeber

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 3,665 posts
  • Location:Green Bay
  • Interests:Poker, who woulda thought.

Posted 26 April 2005 - 01:31 PM

My roommate litterally jumped when I saw these stats, because I bloody laughed so hard. Yes... Tighten up man! Read a NL Hold'Em Book about pre-flop play!You're lucky to be out on-top after this many hands, try to gear it way down in the next 1.5k hands...
"Here are my rules: what can be done with one substance must never be done with another. No two materials are alike. No two sites on earth are alike. No two buildings have the same purpose. The purpose, the site, the material determine the shape. Nothing can be reasonable or beautiful unless its made by one central idea, and the idea sets every detail. A building is alive, like a man." - The Fountainhead.

#19 allinbluff35

allinbluff35

    Inevitably Running Bad

  • Members
  • 9,505 posts
  • Location:The Land Of Busto.

Posted 26 April 2005 - 01:39 PM

you have found out that there is a lot of luck involved in NLHE, can't wait for the downswing stats
Only after you have lost everything, are you free to do anything.


Sign Up For RakeBack Here.

#20 wisky_VI

wisky_VI

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 556 posts
  • Location:Badgerland
  • Interests:poker, cigars, hunting, golf, fishing
  • Favorite Poker Game:2-7 Triple Draw

Posted 27 April 2005 - 02:19 AM

but alas if I see advice/reinforement and actually follow thru that doesn't have to occur. sadly I know some of these things but need to be prodded...Did so last night for about 1.5 hour session and worked well. A few hands with overagression on my part could have been nasty plus played nice and folded properly or close to it pre-flop. Now have to figure how to get pokertracker info from home pc merged with office pc.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users