Jump to content

pokertracker review of stats


Recommended Posts

Though I'm only up to 1400 hands if anyone uses Pokerroom or Paradise I'm willing to transfer ___ dollars for your review of my stat's. Actually I have Netteller money as well if needed.PM me or email wiskyvi@gmail.comIf pokerschools were closer I would certainly enroll and really try to learn some more and work on my faults but alas Wisconsin isn't prime territory.I am reading SS2 and have read SS1, plus have a couple other books waiting to read.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm more worried about restraining my mouth(fingers)from flamers. People typing tough stuff on the net versus in person tends to annoy me but hey what can it hurt....conversly i love to tilt people on chat while playing online !!! hehehe

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't sweat the flamers... most of them don't linger around the strategy section or bother with pokertracker posts. However, don't be surprised if you are criticized and ridiculed for bad play. That's just a rite of passage around here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

that part i understand completely.now I need to figure out how others got those screen shots cut-n-pasted of the important stats !! duh ! :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites
that part i understand completely.now I need to figure out how others got those screen shots cut-n-pasted of the important stats !! duh ! :oops:
well, actually that's not so simple. You can copy a screenshot to the clipboard by pressing alt-print screen. Then you can paste the image into a photo editing program. Then comes the tough part... you have to upload the image to the web; you have to have web space or use a picture sharing service or something like that. If you want to email me the images, I could do that part of it for you, then provide you with links. Betitall@hotmail.com.good luck.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Where's stuff like agro factor? That's important as is call percentages.Well, I don't know how you're winning money, cause 57% VP$IP?!?!That's insane man, and 85% calling from the small blind.62% flops seen is at least twice the ideal also. You my friend are a fish :club:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like to know the aggro factor as well.I would question the OP's ability to sustain any sort of win rate with that VP$IP. I can see winning a bunch over 1,500 hands with that VP$IP, but this smells like a crash and burn waiting to happen.Not trying to flame here...just sounding a caution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok on the fish part, i posted for advice not to say hey i'm the best. flame on but put in advice or constructive criticism with the pain. Thanks.i play only NL.aggr got cutoff for some reason ?preflop .45flop 3.19turn 2.35river 1.44total 1.09

Link to post
Share on other sites

From your stats, I think your success is due to one (or both) of the following:1. You are a wizard at postflop play.2. Your cards have run well so far and your results are significantly better than the expected value of the cards you play.I hope you understand why voluntarily playing 57% of your hands is a losing proposition in the long run.

Link to post
Share on other sites
From your stats, I think your success is due to one (or both) of the following:1. You are a wizard at postflop play.2. Your cards have run well so far and your results are significantly better than the expected value of the cards you play.I hope you understand why voluntarily playing 57% of your hands is a losing proposition in the long run.
******* Please be advised I am not happy with the results and want outside reinforcement/advice on fixing my huge leaks. This was posted with me thinking my play sucks !My only advantage probably at this time is playing a limit far below my bankroll level hence taking risks does not faze me. In the long run I realize this will not work if I want to play larger limits.
Link to post
Share on other sites
From your stats, I think your success is due to one (or both) of the following:1. You are a wizard at postflop play.2. Your cards have run well so far and your results are significantly better than the expected value of the cards you play.I hope you understand why voluntarily playing 57% of your hands is a losing proposition in the long run.
******* Please be advised I am not happy with the results and want outside reinforcement/advice on fixing my huge leaks. This was posted with me thinking my play sucks !My only advantage probably at this time is playing a limit far below my bankroll level hence taking risks does not faze me. In the long run I realize this will not work if I want to play larger limits.
Your results are actually well above average. Kudos to you for realizing that your game has leaks while your results do not show them. NLHE cash games aren't my expertise, so I don't have much to add other than hand selection. It seems to me that you are playing at least twice as many hands as you should.
Link to post
Share on other sites

My roommate litterally jumped when I saw these stats, because I bloody laughed so hard. Yes... Tighten up man! Read a NL Hold'Em Book about pre-flop play!You're lucky to be out on-top after this many hands, try to gear it way down in the next 1.5k hands...

Link to post
Share on other sites

but alas if I see advice/reinforement and actually follow thru that doesn't have to occur. sadly I know some of these things but need to be prodded...Did so last night for about 1.5 hour session and worked well. A few hands with overagression on my part could have been nasty plus played nice and folded properly or close to it pre-flop. Now have to figure how to get pokertracker info from home pc merged with office pc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

actually, depending on the blinds and the size of the stacks in the game seeing a lot of flops isn't always bad (i.e. with good drawing hands, in position, with several others in the pot). I'd have to see some of the hands, but it's not that bad. It more than likely wouldn't hurt to tighten up some, especially from earlier position if you're seeing lots of flops with marginal hands. But one stat stuck out at me. 43% of the time you saw a flop, you were winning money? I'm no pokertracker expert but that sounds pretty good. Winning money almost half the time you see a flop cannot be a bad thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Now have to figure how to get pokertracker info from home pc merged with office pc.
the pokertracker guy will give you another code if you want to install it on another pc. Just email him.
I did see that and sent the email early this am, just got to figure out how to share the hands with both systems since I play in two different locations.side note 'bad' stats are getting better though it will take many hands to make a good dent in the % of course.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Now have to figure how to get pokertracker info from home pc merged with office pc.
the pokertracker guy will give you another code if you want to install it on another pc. Just email him.
I did see that and sent the email early this am, just got to figure out how to share the hands with both systems since I play in two different locations.side note 'bad' stats are getting better though it will take many hands to make a good dent in the % of course.
Your best bet is to just import the files on each computer. Either request the hand histories twice, or after they have been imported on PC A, copy the files to PC B, then import them there. (burn them to Cd maybe?) Either way it sounds like a royal pain in the A*^.There might be a better way, but I haven't really looked into it yet.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly, your play does suck. You are the players I look to have at my tables. My suggestion is to get Winning Low Limit Hold'em and work on your pre-flop play. This looks to easily be your biggest leak. Once you get your preflop play cleaned up some, get Small Stakes Hold'em and work on your postflop play which is ultimately more important (and harder). Don't move up in limits anytime soon either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...