Jump to content


Loose Call Down?


  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

#1 Zach6668

Zach6668

    2009 Stanley Cup Champions

  • Moderators
  • 36,826 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thunder Bay, ON

Posted 17 September 2007 - 08:42 PM

Absolute Poker
Limit Holdem Ring game
Limit: $5/$10
9 players
Converter

Pre-flop: (9 players) Hero is BB with jc.gif jh.gif
6 folds, Button raises, SB folds, Hero 3-bets, Button calls.

Flop: kh.gif 3d.gif 4s.gif (6.6SB, 2 players)
Hero bets, Button calls.

Turn: ks.gif (4.3BB, 2 players)
Hero bets, Button raises, Hero calls.

River: 6h.gif (8.3BB, 2 players)
Hero checks, Button bets, Hero calls.

Results:
Final pot: 10.3BB


Villain is 22/7/1.3 over 199. Haven't noticed anything from him.

How big of a spew is this? Or can I fold here?

Or, since it's btn vs blind, can I call down a decent bluff card?
QUOTE (serge @ Tuesday, May 12th, 2009, 7:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
LETS GO PITTSBURGH
QUOTE (Acid_Knight @ Monday, March 10th, 2008, 4:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Zach is right about pretty much everything.

#2 wsox8

wsox8

    trying to break even at LIFE

  • Members
  • 11,421 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Heights
  • Interests:cheese, apple juice, raisins

Posted 17 September 2007 - 09:32 PM

Here I go with my "amazing LHE analysis".

FR I think we can get away from this.

I'd give the villain KQ-KT, but it's pretty wide open because he could be raising any button... Any reads on if he steals/normally raises from LP?

#3 Zach6668

Zach6668

    2009 Stanley Cup Champions

  • Moderators
  • 36,826 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thunder Bay, ON

Posted 17 September 2007 - 09:40 PM

Na, no reads. I was pretty suprised I actually had 200 hands on him.

I agree with your "full ring" statement.
QUOTE (serge @ Tuesday, May 12th, 2009, 7:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
LETS GO PITTSBURGH
QUOTE (Acid_Knight @ Monday, March 10th, 2008, 4:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Zach is right about pretty much everything.

#4 KowboyKoop

KowboyKoop

    The Excellence of Execution

  • Members
  • 9,129 posts
  • Location:Des Moines, Iowa

Posted 17 September 2007 - 11:04 PM

You don't think he might have a medium pair and be making this move?? I mean...with the second K he thinks it is that much more likely that you don't have a king......so he thinks a hand like 88 is good.....or that you are betting with nothing and is trying to get you too fold......I think I would have to call this one down..if he made trips on you he made trips on you, but I certainly don't think he has to have a K to make this play. I think 66 - TT make this play from the button possibly......as well as a hand like AQ-A9 if he thinks you are weak....enough doubt to warrant a call down I think, barring any particular reads.
KowboyKoop >>>>>>>>>>> Teneight


Five years in the making

#5 Actuary

Actuary

    .

  • Members
  • 19,026 posts

Posted 18 September 2007 - 12:31 AM

You see, I'm not agreeing with the reraise from the hot drop blind with Js. You need to hit that flop or you outtie there. Wit the online, you going to have chasers all day all night... like gold miners in moonlight. Take those Js and come strong, find where you are. K on flop, pause, check. see what he does, Now this is where you need your reads. Grandpa be rolling with KQ preflop and now look, you're drawing to two outs, Wait, see how much he bets and play it like Uncle Tim laying out that wholesale carpeting. Low and slow, stretch it out. You got past the hard part now that 2nd King is either a killer or a saviour. By now if you don't know then go back to the kiddie games. This is aint the time to be guessing. You got to sho winners or no one respecks you.

#6 ROACHBABY

ROACHBABY

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 695 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Louisville, KY

Posted 18 September 2007 - 07:22 AM

QUOTE (Actuary @ Tuesday, September 18th, 2007, 4:31 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
see how much he bets and play it like Uncle Tim laying out that wholesale carpeting.


See how much he bets? This is limit, I can guess how much he will bet, unless you are talking about sheer number of bets.

Your uncle Tim is in the carpeting business too,huh?

#7 Zach6668

Zach6668

    2009 Stanley Cup Champions

  • Moderators
  • 36,826 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thunder Bay, ON

Posted 18 September 2007 - 09:20 AM

nh Act.
QUOTE (serge @ Tuesday, May 12th, 2009, 7:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
LETS GO PITTSBURGH
QUOTE (Acid_Knight @ Monday, March 10th, 2008, 4:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Zach is right about pretty much everything.

#8 KowboyKoop

KowboyKoop

    The Excellence of Execution

  • Members
  • 9,129 posts
  • Location:Des Moines, Iowa

Posted 18 September 2007 - 12:06 PM

QUOTE (Zach6668 @ Tuesday, September 18th, 2007, 12:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
nh Act.


So do you agree with what I wrote? I think this is a very interesting hand and am curious what you think about the villian having a hand like 88 enough times here to warrant a call down.
KowboyKoop >>>>>>>>>>> Teneight


Five years in the making

#9 Zach6668

Zach6668

    2009 Stanley Cup Champions

  • Moderators
  • 36,826 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thunder Bay, ON

Posted 18 September 2007 - 12:12 PM

Well, I called down, didn't I?




To be honest, I think this villain is too passive to do this against. I should be folding, I think.
QUOTE (serge @ Tuesday, May 12th, 2009, 7:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
LETS GO PITTSBURGH
QUOTE (Acid_Knight @ Monday, March 10th, 2008, 4:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Zach is right about pretty much everything.

#10 wsox8

wsox8

    trying to break even at LIFE

  • Members
  • 11,421 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Heights
  • Interests:cheese, apple juice, raisins

Posted 18 September 2007 - 05:28 PM

QUOTE (Zach6668 @ Tuesday, September 18th, 2007, 3:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Well, I called down, didn't I?
To be honest, I think this villain is too passive to do this against. I should be folding, I think.

I figured you called down.. I think I would have to but I'm not a big fan of the play. Just one of my leaks smile.gif

#11 Actuary

Actuary

    .

  • Members
  • 19,026 posts

Posted 18 September 2007 - 07:23 PM

QUOTE (Zach6668 @ Tuesday, September 18th, 2007, 9:20 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
nh Act.


smile.gif

#12 cubbybri

cubbybri

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 704 posts
  • Location:London, Canada
  • Interests:Poker, Hockey Football, Reading, Movies
  • Favorite Poker Game:Limit Hold'Em

Posted 18 September 2007 - 11:53 PM

I see KQ-KT here most often. On not too draw heavy a board given the action, he may well have just wanted to see what you did as the aggressor on the flop. The K coming, helps him and confuses you.

Having said that. If we take Koop's logic into account(very valid line for villain), I think we are at approx. a dead heat(Little more to the behind stat if you do not think he would cap QQ pre. I think slim to none in a but vs blind hand. In any case, the pot says to call if you feel on the fence with this one). That would tell me your line is fine. This is only without a read.

If buttons stealing range is greater, you have to throw in some King rags to the mix which lean to folding. Then on the other end, knowing if he bluffs may balance things out or lean to folding.

I say your line is fine for the non-read but expect to cuss when he turns the K. Cuss louder if he hit his FH on river.

#13 looshle

looshle

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,236 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Connecticut

Posted 09 October 2007 - 01:50 AM

Def gotta call this down. I assume a K raises you on the flop, and the 2nd one means Im not laying down.
QUOTE (rcgs59 @ Sunday, December 12th, 2010, 10:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
say what?

I don't berate players unless they are donkeys making bad plays


#14 Zach6668

Zach6668

    2009 Stanley Cup Champions

  • Moderators
  • 36,826 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thunder Bay, ON

Posted 09 October 2007 - 01:57 AM

Ya, I agree with ya vs about 98% of my opponents.

This guy I think I could have found a fold against and have it be marginally +EV, or =EV, but I don't think it'd be a huge leak to call down. I probably have a better read now though, than I did at the time.
QUOTE (serge @ Tuesday, May 12th, 2009, 7:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
LETS GO PITTSBURGH
QUOTE (Acid_Knight @ Monday, March 10th, 2008, 4:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Zach is right about pretty much everything.

#15 antistuff

antistuff

    monotonously monotonous

  • Members
  • 5,466 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:new york city

Posted 18 October 2007 - 02:37 PM

i think that the best line against a player that you feel you need to call down here is to check/call check/call.
QUOTE ( Barry Greenstein)
Successful gamblers are compulsive winners.

#16 Abbaddabba

Abbaddabba

    breaking even like it's 1999

  • Members
  • 5,225 posts

Posted 19 October 2007 - 10:05 AM

those are the people against which betting the turn is best.

#17 checkymcfold

checkymcfold

    almost back to real stakes.

  • Members
  • 9,113 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:stanley mission, sk
  • Favorite Poker Game:night baseball

Posted 20 October 2007 - 04:38 PM

if i'm sure i want to show this down, i actually c/c the turn and river about 25% of the time if the villain is aggressive. i also c/r/f the turn about 25% of the time, but that's mostly for hands in the future when i might want a free card from oop.

my standard line would be what you did, though.
QUOTE (Dirtydutch @ Tuesday, December 2nd, 2008, 12:21 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If there are two things LHE players like, they are weed and pornography. The third would be kittens. LHE does not appear on the list.








0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users