It's 53... FIFTY FREAKING THREE!! That's such a huge number.. I think betting the under his is a fantastic play.. generally, 50 plus point over/unders are huge sucker plays for the over. I mean, it's the first week, the offenses won't be clicking yet.. it order for them hit 53, both offenses have to be clicking, not just one.. this seems like a no brain under, no matter how good their offenses are... what do you guys think?
0
Colts Vs Saints Over/under...
Started by BigDMcGee, Sep 06 2007 01:51 AM
15 replies to this topic
#1
BigDMcGee
-
- Members
- 21,057 posts
Forum Entitlist
- Gender:Male
Posted 06 September 2007 - 01:51 AM
"We are only wise in knowing that we know nothing"
-Socrates
"Dust. Wind. Dude."
-Ted Theodore Logan
SN: BigDMcGee on Stars and UB. I do NOT have a full tilt account because those Richers won't give me rakeback.
#2
jcashx36x
-
- Members
- 2,298 posts
Time to Explode n' Create in 08
- Gender:Male
- Favorite Poker Game:NLHE
Posted 06 September 2007 - 03:42 AM
Easy OVer!!! and take louisville -39 
jcashx36x on pokerstars
#3
Vandees
-
- Members
- 369 posts
Poker Forum Nut
- Location:Des Moines, IA
- Interests:Sports, cards, beer
Posted 06 September 2007 - 05:31 AM
I think I'd take the over pretty easily here. Defense may be ahead of offense at this stage of the season, but these 2 offenses are pretty explosive. I guess I could see the score being 24-20 or 27-21 or something for the under, but more likely I think it will be over.
Tell you the truth, I'd stay away from that line altogether.
Tell you the truth, I'd stay away from that line altogether.
My mom always told me no matter how dumb the dealer looks, always cut the cards.
#4
BigDMcGee
-
- Members
- 21,057 posts
Forum Entitlist
- Gender:Male
Posted 06 September 2007 - 05:59 AM
QUOTE (Vandees @ Thursday, September 6th, 2007, 5:31 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I think I'd take the over pretty easily here. Defense may be ahead of offense at this stage of the season, but these 2 offenses are pretty explosive. I guess I could see the score being 24-20 or 27-21 or something for the under, but more likely I think it will be over.
Tell you the truth, I'd stay away from that line altogether.
Tell you the truth, I'd stay away from that line altogether.
yeah, staying away is probably the better bet.. but I definately don't think 53 is an "easy over" I Don't think people know how rare it is for games to go over 53.
"We are only wise in knowing that we know nothing"
-Socrates
"Dust. Wind. Dude."
-Ted Theodore Logan
SN: BigDMcGee on Stars and UB. I do NOT have a full tilt account because those Richers won't give me rakeback.
#5
BigDMcGee
-
- Members
- 21,057 posts
Forum Entitlist
- Gender:Male
Posted 06 September 2007 - 02:03 PM
one game went over 53 all of last year.. that sold m, I'm in for the under... wish me luck.
"We are only wise in knowing that we know nothing"
-Socrates
"Dust. Wind. Dude."
-Ted Theodore Logan
SN: BigDMcGee on Stars and UB. I do NOT have a full tilt account because those Richers won't give me rakeback.
#6
Nikki_N
-
- Members
- 31,663 posts
FCPHA Angel
- Gender:Female
- Location:An epic too small to be tragic.
- Favorite Poker Game:PLO8
Posted 06 September 2007 - 02:11 PM
GO COLTS!
Valar Morghulis
#7
aadams_22
-
- Members
- 8,626 posts
.......what?
- Gender:Male
- Location:West Frankfort, IL
Posted 06 September 2007 - 02:16 PM
under
2009 FCP Fantasy Baseball Keeper League Champion
#8
stecavdians
-
- Members
- 14 posts
Poker Forum Newbie
Posted 06 September 2007 - 02:19 PM
QUOTE (BigDMcGee @ Thursday, September 6th, 2007, 5:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
one game went over 53 all of last year.. that sold m, I'm in for the under... wish me luck.
I don't think that's right. I counted 7 games in the first 3 weeks that went over 53.
#9
wsox8
-
- Members
- 11,421 posts
trying to break even at LIFE
- Gender:Male
- Location:Heights
- Interests:cheese, apple juice, raisins
Posted 06 September 2007 - 03:27 PM
I like the under
#10
digitalmonkey
-
- Members
- 28,813 posts
Unenjoyable Annoying Retard
- Gender:Male
- Location:Sudbury
- Interests:sports, music, movies, photography
- Favorite Poker Game:Hi/Lo Chicago
Posted 06 September 2007 - 07:31 PM
Sittin' at 51 late in the game. The under looks good.
#11
BigDMcGee
-
- Members
- 21,057 posts
Forum Entitlist
- Gender:Male
Posted 07 September 2007 - 12:42 AM
Whew, made me sweat.. bad info on the over lack of over 53's..
"We are only wise in knowing that we know nothing"
-Socrates
"Dust. Wind. Dude."
-Ted Theodore Logan
SN: BigDMcGee on Stars and UB. I do NOT have a full tilt account because those Richers won't give me rakeback.
#12
Loismustdie
-
- Members
- 7,236 posts
What year is this?
- Gender:Male
- Location:Phoenix
Posted 07 September 2007 - 07:18 AM
Disregarding the sports betting part, how one-sided was this game? N.O. was the highest scoring offense last year and Indy one of the worst defenses. What the hell happened?
So much for a comeback.
#13
David_Nicoson
-
- Members
- 4,418 posts
Official Forum Me
- Gender:Male
- Location:Indianapolis
- Interests:Poker<br />Poker<br />Sex<br />Sleep<br />baseball<br />softball<br />Poker<br />Poker<br />Poker<br />Axis and Allies and other lesser board games<br />Chess<br />Poker<br />Poker<br />Poker
- Favorite Poker Game:pot-limit Euchre
Posted 07 September 2007 - 07:21 AM
QUOTE (Loismustdie @ Friday, September 7th, 2007, 11:18 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Disregarding the sports betting part, how one-sided was this game? N.O. was the highest scoring offense last year and Indy one of the worst defenses. What the hell happened?
Indy's defense was pretty good when Bob Sanders was playing last year, too.
QUOTE(bleacherbum3 @ Friday, February 29th, 2008, 3:28 AM) 
I'm invincible. Like Super Mario when he gets that star thingy.
#14
Jadaki
-
- Members
- 22,247 posts
IIOY?
- Gender:Male
Posted 07 September 2007 - 10:03 AM
QUOTE (David_Nicoson @ Friday, September 7th, 2007, 10:21 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Indy's defense was pretty good when Bob Sanders was playing last year, too.
From the University of Iowa
- DDIDM
#15
DrawingDeadInDM
-
- Members
- 18,246 posts
BCS Bound
- Gender:Male
Posted 07 September 2007 - 01:55 PM
QUOTE (David_Nicoson @ Friday, September 7th, 2007, 7:21 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Indy's defense was pretty good when Bob Sanders was playing last year, too.
Obv.
QUOTE (Jadaki @ Friday, September 7th, 2007, 10:03 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
From the University of Iowa
- DDIDM
- DDIDM
Obv.
And..
Obv.
I'm also fed up with the common cold but I just hate to say goodbye.
#16
Loismustdie
-
- Members
- 7,236 posts
What year is this?
- Gender:Male
- Location:Phoenix
Posted 07 September 2007 - 07:11 PM
QUOTE (David_Nicoson @ Friday, September 7th, 2007, 8:21 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Indy's defense was pretty good when Bob Sanders was playing last year, too.
Agreed,but not against top notch offenses. Somethi8ng is wrong with N.O. So far, the big hole I am finding is while having 2 great backs is nice, they never get into a rythmn against good defenses, not to mention some of the playing calling was Cardinalesque.
So much for a comeback.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
