BigDMcGee 3,367 Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 It's 53... FIFTY FREAKING THREE!! That's such a huge number.. I think betting the under his is a fantastic play.. generally, 50 plus point over/unders are huge sucker plays for the over. I mean, it's the first week, the offenses won't be clicking yet.. it order for them hit 53, both offenses have to be clicking, not just one.. this seems like a no brain under, no matter how good their offenses are... what do you guys think? Link to post Share on other sites
jcashx36x 0 Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 Easy OVer!!! and take louisville -39 Link to post Share on other sites
Vandees 0 Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 I think I'd take the over pretty easily here. Defense may be ahead of offense at this stage of the season, but these 2 offenses are pretty explosive. I guess I could see the score being 24-20 or 27-21 or something for the under, but more likely I think it will be over. Tell you the truth, I'd stay away from that line altogether. Link to post Share on other sites
BigDMcGee 3,367 Posted September 6, 2007 Author Share Posted September 6, 2007 I think I'd take the over pretty easily here. Defense may be ahead of offense at this stage of the season, but these 2 offenses are pretty explosive. I guess I could see the score being 24-20 or 27-21 or something for the under, but more likely I think it will be over. Tell you the truth, I'd stay away from that line altogether.yeah, staying away is probably the better bet.. but I definately don't think 53 is an "easy over" I Don't think people know how rare it is for games to go over 53. Link to post Share on other sites
BigDMcGee 3,367 Posted September 6, 2007 Author Share Posted September 6, 2007 one game went over 53 all of last year.. that sold m, I'm in for the under... wish me luck. Link to post Share on other sites
Nikki_N 17 Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 GO COLTS! Link to post Share on other sites
aadams_22 3 Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 under Link to post Share on other sites
stecavdians 0 Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 one game went over 53 all of last year.. that sold m, I'm in for the under... wish me luck.I don't think that's right. I counted 7 games in the first 3 weeks that went over 53. Link to post Share on other sites
wsox8 10 Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 I like the under Link to post Share on other sites
digitalmonkey 929 Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Sittin' at 51 late in the game. The under looks good. Link to post Share on other sites
BigDMcGee 3,367 Posted September 7, 2007 Author Share Posted September 7, 2007 Whew, made me sweat.. bad info on the over lack of over 53's.. Link to post Share on other sites
Loismustdie 0 Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Disregarding the sports betting part, how one-sided was this game? N.O. was the highest scoring offense last year and Indy one of the worst defenses. What the hell happened? Link to post Share on other sites
David_Nicoson 1 Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Disregarding the sports betting part, how one-sided was this game? N.O. was the highest scoring offense last year and Indy one of the worst defenses. What the hell happened?Indy's defense was pretty good when Bob Sanders was playing last year, too. Link to post Share on other sites
Jadaki 1 Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Indy's defense was pretty good when Bob Sanders was playing last year, too.From the University of Iowa- DDIDM Link to post Share on other sites
DrawingDeadInDM 0 Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Indy's defense was pretty good when Bob Sanders was playing last year, too.Obv. From the University of Iowa- DDIDMObv. And.. Obv. Link to post Share on other sites
Loismustdie 0 Posted September 8, 2007 Share Posted September 8, 2007 Indy's defense was pretty good when Bob Sanders was playing last year, too. Agreed,but not against top notch offenses. Somethi8ng is wrong with N.O. So far, the big hole I am finding is while having 2 great backs is nice, they never get into a rythmn against good defenses, not to mention some of the playing calling was Cardinalesque. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now