Flop A Monster - Standard Play
#1
Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:28 AM
$1/$2 $200 Max
About an hour into the table. Very tight table. I am playing TAG & am down about 1/4 of a buy-in.
Hero BB ($150)
Villain #1 UTG Very Tight ($150)
Villian #2 MP Very Tight but sort of a Donk at times ($200)
Hero J/10o
Several callers
Hero Checks Option
Pot $10
Flop: 8/9/Q Rainbow
Villian #1 Bets $20
Villian #2 Raise to $50
Fold to Hero - Mild Hollywood (I am assuming V#1 has a decent pair and V#2 either 2 pair or a set) then pushes
Villian #1 Tanks - then Mucks
Villian #2 Tanks - then Calls
So, regardless of my image I am getting great Value for my hand...
...however...
...we know the rest (why else post this hand?)
Turn 2
River 9
My question is this: Being a prohibitive favorite still means you are going to lose x% of the time (unless you are only going to play the Stone Nuts). On a play like this where I induced the bad guy to make a very bad call, is there any other "option"? I think this was pretty standard.
#2
Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:35 AM
#3
Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:36 AM
???????????
#4
Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:37 AM
-- 21Dan on Tilt
-- JewishDan on UB
#5
Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:40 AM
Elaboration:
We are ahead of any hand at this point, and if one of our opponents gets their money in we will be ahead right now. Since Villain 1 had to "tank," unless he's saving face, we have reason to believe that he's laid down at least one pair, if not two or a bottom set (if he's that cool). That's between 1-2 outs that villain now is missing to draw to his boat, giving us a further lead.
How can you not want a call from a worse hand for stacks!?!?!12
#6
Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:42 AM
Your equity actually goes below what's already in the pot. He's got a mathematically correct call at the flop getting 2.5:1. It's nice to get villians to fold when they have equity in the pot.
#7
Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:43 AM
Equity if he folds = $230ish (assuming there's about $10 in pot preflop). Equity in the pot if vilian calls probably goes down to $200 or so.
#8
Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:45 AM
If he flopped the set I'm about a 2:1 favorite...
...turns out it was Top two and I was WAY ahead.
#9
Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:46 AM
If you want, I'll trade you my sklansky dollars for your real $$.
#10
Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:47 AM
We are ahead of any hand at this point, and if one of our opponents gets their money in we will be ahead right now. Since Villain 1 had to "tank," unless he's saving face, we have reason to believe that he's laid down at least one pair, if not two or a bottom set (if he's that cool). That's between 1-2 outs that villain now is missing to draw to his boat, giving us a further lead.
Forgot about that, but still not going to change it that much. There's nothing strategic about what I'm saying... I just think it's interesting.
#11
Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:47 AM
??
#12
Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:47 AM
Thanks... & I know - BBF is that-a-way
#13
Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:50 AM
Sorry, didn't mean to start a $hit storm here... I just think it's something interesting that is more my Omaha mind talking....
Assume there's $230 in the pot now: 10 preflop, 20 bet, 50 raise $150 push. If villian folds QQ you wint $230 100% of the time. If villian calls,
You win $330, 67% of the time = $221.
$221<$230. Like i said nothing major and nothing strategic, I just think it's interesting because obviously the knee jerk reaction is "WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?"
#14
Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:52 AM
Assume there's $230 in the pot now: 10 preflop, 20 bet, 50 raise $150 push. If villian folds QQ you wint $230 100% of the time. If villian calls,
You win $330, 67% of the time = $221.
$221<$230. Like i said nothing major and nothing strategic, I just think it's interesting because obviously the knee jerk reaction is "WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?"
I think if villain is missing an out or two though, via the laydown of villain #1, our equity changes, and we might come out on top.
#15
Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:54 AM
Assume there's $230 in the pot now: 10 preflop, 20 bet, 50 raise $150 push. If villian folds QQ you wint $230 100% of the time. If villian calls,
You win $330, 67% of the time = $221.
$221<$230. Like i said nothing major and nothing strategic, I just think it's interesting because obviously the knee jerk reaction is "WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?"
No storming! Enjoying the discussion.
Based on his body language I figured him for the call. He was feeling confident and had been waiting to make a move. However, at this point I am also OK with taking the $75 of other people's $ in the pot and going on to the next hand. If he calls, that is good too since I am a favorite.
#16
Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:56 AM
68% with one dead
71% with two dead
so two outs would flip it.
#17
Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:57 AM
Based on his body language I figured him for the call. He was feeling confident and had been waiting to make a move. However, at this point I am also OK with taking the $75 of other people's $ in the pot and going on to the next hand. If he calls, that is good too since I am a favorite.
Yeah the hand is competely standard.
#18
Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:58 AM
71% with two dead
so two outs would flip it.
Either way, it's pretty close. What do you want here if you're hero, a call or a fold?
#19
Posted 15 August 2007 - 08:01 AM
Here I'd want a call cause he's got a lot of other hands that aren't sets. Two pair is 4:1 against us and and overpair is trying close to dead.
#20
Posted 15 August 2007 - 08:02 AM
I think we have to calculate our equity based on villain's range, and not just a set then. This is why I was talking about sklansky dollars.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









