Jump to content


Flop A Monster - Standard Play


  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

#1 Pot Odds RAC

Pot Odds RAC

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 6,967 posts
  • Location:Motown
  • Favorite Poker Game:Live NL TxHE

Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:28 AM

Live Casino Motor City Detroit
$1/$2 $200 Max

About an hour into the table. Very tight table. I am playing TAG & am down about 1/4 of a buy-in.

Hero BB ($150)
Villain #1 UTG Very Tight ($150)
Villian #2 MP Very Tight but sort of a Donk at times ($200)

Hero J/10o

Several callers
Hero Checks Option

Pot $10
Flop: 8/9/Q Rainbow

Villian #1 Bets $20
Villian #2 Raise to $50
Fold to Hero - Mild Hollywood (I am assuming V#1 has a decent pair and V#2 either 2 pair or a set) then pushes

Villian #1 Tanks - then Mucks
Villian #2 Tanks - then Calls

So, regardless of my image I am getting great Value for my hand...

...however...

...we know the rest (why else post this hand?)

Turn 2
River 9

My question is this: Being a prohibitive favorite still means you are going to lose x% of the time (unless you are only going to play the Stone Nuts). On a play like this where I induced the bad guy to make a very bad call, is there any other "option"? I think this was pretty standard.

#2 Scott3705

Scott3705

    Pay-Off Wizard

  • Members
  • 3,761 posts

Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:35 AM

interesting thing about this hand. If villian has a set, you don't want him to call. Just thought I'd throw that in there. Besides that, bad beats happen. meh.

#3 rdtedm

rdtedm

    2009?

  • Members
  • 2,605 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Colorado
  • Favorite Poker Game:NLHE

Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:36 AM

QUOTE (Scott3705 @ Wednesday, August 15th, 2007, 9:35 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
interesting thing about this hand. If villian has a set, you don't want him to call. Just thought I'd throw that in there. Besides that, bad beats happen. meh.


???????????

#4 dgostate8

dgostate8

    Poker Forum Regular

  • Members
  • 226 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tempe AZ

Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:37 AM

Sounds like you played it very well to me, don't change anything. And for once I won't post what the standard reply to a post like this...but I'm sure someone else will...
-- DGoState8 on Stars
-- 21Dan on Tilt
-- JewishDan on UB

#5 rdtedm

rdtedm

    2009?

  • Members
  • 2,605 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Colorado
  • Favorite Poker Game:NLHE

Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:40 AM

QUOTE (rdtedm @ Wednesday, August 15th, 2007, 9:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
???????????


Elaboration:
We are ahead of any hand at this point, and if one of our opponents gets their money in we will be ahead right now. Since Villain 1 had to "tank," unless he's saving face, we have reason to believe that he's laid down at least one pair, if not two or a bottom set (if he's that cool). That's between 1-2 outs that villain now is missing to draw to his boat, giving us a further lead.

How can you not want a call from a worse hand for stacks!?!?!12

#6 Scott3705

Scott3705

    Pay-Off Wizard

  • Members
  • 3,761 posts

Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:42 AM

QUOTE (rdtedm @ Wednesday, August 15th, 2007, 7:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
???????????

Your equity actually goes below what's already in the pot. He's got a mathematically correct call at the flop getting 2.5:1. It's nice to get villians to fold when they have equity in the pot.

#7 Scott3705

Scott3705

    Pay-Off Wizard

  • Members
  • 3,761 posts

Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:43 AM

QUOTE (Scott3705 @ Wednesday, August 15th, 2007, 7:42 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Your equity actually goes below what's already in the pot. He's got a mathematically correct call at the flop getting 2.5:1. It's nice to get villians to fold when they have equity in the pot.

Equity if he folds = $230ish (assuming there's about $10 in pot preflop). Equity in the pot if vilian calls probably goes down to $200 or so.

#8 Pot Odds RAC

Pot Odds RAC

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 6,967 posts
  • Location:Motown
  • Favorite Poker Game:Live NL TxHE

Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:45 AM

QUOTE (Scott3705 @ Wednesday, August 15th, 2007, 7:35 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
interesting thing about this hand. If villian has a set, you don't want him to call. Just thought I'd throw that in there. Besides that, bad beats happen. meh.

If he flopped the set I'm about a 2:1 favorite...

...turns out it was Top two and I was WAY ahead.

#9 rdtedm

rdtedm

    2009?

  • Members
  • 2,605 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Colorado
  • Favorite Poker Game:NLHE

Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:46 AM

QUOTE (Scott3705 @ Wednesday, August 15th, 2007, 9:42 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Your equity actually goes below what's already in the pot. He's got a mathematically correct call at the flop getting 2.5:1. It's nice to get villians to fold when they have equity in the pot.


If you want, I'll trade you my sklansky dollars for your real $$.

#10 Scott3705

Scott3705

    Pay-Off Wizard

  • Members
  • 3,761 posts

Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:47 AM

QUOTE (rdtedm @ Wednesday, August 15th, 2007, 7:40 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Elaboration:
We are ahead of any hand at this point, and if one of our opponents gets their money in we will be ahead right now. Since Villain 1 had to "tank," unless he's saving face, we have reason to believe that he's laid down at least one pair, if not two or a bottom set (if he's that cool). That's between 1-2 outs that villain now is missing to draw to his boat, giving us a further lead.


Forgot about that, but still not going to change it that much. There's nothing strategic about what I'm saying... I just think it's interesting.

#11 Scott3705

Scott3705

    Pay-Off Wizard

  • Members
  • 3,761 posts

Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:47 AM

QUOTE (rdtedm @ Wednesday, August 15th, 2007, 7:46 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If you want, I'll trade you my sklansky dollars for your real $$.

??

#12 Pot Odds RAC

Pot Odds RAC

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 6,967 posts
  • Location:Motown
  • Favorite Poker Game:Live NL TxHE

Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:47 AM

QUOTE (dgostate8 @ Wednesday, August 15th, 2007, 7:37 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Sounds like you played it very well to me, don't change anything. And for once I won't post what the standard reply to a post like this...but I'm sure someone else will...

Thanks... & I know - BBF is that-a-way

#13 Scott3705

Scott3705

    Pay-Off Wizard

  • Members
  • 3,761 posts

Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:50 AM

QUOTE (Pot Odds RAC @ Wednesday, August 15th, 2007, 7:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If he flops the set I'm about a 2:1 favorite

Sorry, didn't mean to start a $hit storm here... I just think it's something interesting that is more my Omaha mind talking....

Assume there's $230 in the pot now: 10 preflop, 20 bet, 50 raise $150 push. If villian folds QQ you wint $230 100% of the time. If villian calls,
You win $330, 67% of the time = $221.

$221<$230. Like i said nothing major and nothing strategic, I just think it's interesting because obviously the knee jerk reaction is "WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?"

#14 rdtedm

rdtedm

    2009?

  • Members
  • 2,605 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Colorado
  • Favorite Poker Game:NLHE

Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:52 AM

QUOTE (Scott3705 @ Wednesday, August 15th, 2007, 9:50 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Sorry, didn't mean to start a $hit storm here... I just think it's something interesting that is more my Omaha mind talking....

Assume there's $230 in the pot now: 10 preflop, 20 bet, 50 raise $150 push. If villian folds QQ you wint $230 100% of the time. If villian calls,
You win $330, 67% of the time = $221.

$221<$230. Like i said nothing major and nothing strategic, I just think it's interesting because obviously the knee jerk reaction is "WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?"


I think if villain is missing an out or two though, via the laydown of villain #1, our equity changes, and we might come out on top.

#15 Pot Odds RAC

Pot Odds RAC

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 6,967 posts
  • Location:Motown
  • Favorite Poker Game:Live NL TxHE

Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:54 AM

QUOTE (Scott3705 @ Wednesday, August 15th, 2007, 7:50 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Sorry, didn't mean to start a $hit storm here... I just think it's something interesting that is more my Omaha mind talking....

Assume there's $230 in the pot now: 10 preflop, 20 bet, 50 raise $150 push. If villian folds QQ you wint $230 100% of the time. If villian calls,
You win $330, 67% of the time = $221.

$221<$230. Like i said nothing major and nothing strategic, I just think it's interesting because obviously the knee jerk reaction is "WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?"

No storming! Enjoying the discussion.

Based on his body language I figured him for the call. He was feeling confident and had been waiting to make a move. However, at this point I am also OK with taking the $75 of other people's $ in the pot and going on to the next hand. If he calls, that is good too since I am a favorite.

#16 Scott3705

Scott3705

    Pay-Off Wizard

  • Members
  • 3,761 posts

Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:56 AM

QUOTE (rdtedm @ Wednesday, August 15th, 2007, 7:52 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I think if villain is missing an out or two though, via the laydown of villain #1, our equity changes, and we might come out on top.

68% with one dead
71% with two dead

so two outs would flip it.

#17 Scott3705

Scott3705

    Pay-Off Wizard

  • Members
  • 3,761 posts

Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:57 AM

QUOTE (Pot Odds RAC @ Wednesday, August 15th, 2007, 7:54 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
No storming! Enjoying the discussion.

Based on his body language I figured him for the call. He was feeling confident and had been waiting to make a move. However, at this point I am also OK with taking the $75 of other people's $ in the pot and going on to the next hand. If he calls, that is good too since I am a favorite.


Yeah the hand is competely standard.

#18 rdtedm

rdtedm

    2009?

  • Members
  • 2,605 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Colorado
  • Favorite Poker Game:NLHE

Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:58 AM

QUOTE (Scott3705 @ Wednesday, August 15th, 2007, 9:56 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
68% with one dead
71% with two dead

so two outs would flip it.


Either way, it's pretty close. What do you want here if you're hero, a call or a fold?

#19 Scott3705

Scott3705

    Pay-Off Wizard

  • Members
  • 3,761 posts

Posted 15 August 2007 - 08:01 AM

QUOTE (rdtedm @ Wednesday, August 15th, 2007, 7:58 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Either way, it's pretty close. What do you want here if you're hero, a call or a fold?

Here I'd want a call cause he's got a lot of other hands that aren't sets. Two pair is 4:1 against us and and overpair is trying close to dead.

#20 rdtedm

rdtedm

    2009?

  • Members
  • 2,605 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Colorado
  • Favorite Poker Game:NLHE

Posted 15 August 2007 - 08:02 AM

QUOTE (Scott3705 @ Wednesday, August 15th, 2007, 10:01 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Here I'd want a call cause he's got a lot of other hands that aren't sets. Two pair is 4:1 against us and and overpair is trying close to dead.


I think we have to calculate our equity based on villain's range, and not just a set then. This is why I was talking about sklansky dollars.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users