Here's a hand I just played that I'd like feedback on. Especially from wrto who was in the hand.2/4 HE with 10 people. The table is loose and full of horrible people except wrtoI'm UTG and get 3
3
I call, 1 fold, MP1 calls, wrto raises, 1 fold, CO+1 3-bets, 2 folds, SB call, BB calls, I call, MP1 folds, wrto caps, everyone calls.I called the 3-bet because there was going to be at least 4 other people and possibly 5 other people seeing this flop so if I hit a set I could get payed off huge. Is this bad logic since with much action there is bound to be big pairs and I might lose to bigger set?After wrto caps he has KK, AA or AKs, and similar for CO+1 with no idea what the blinds might have.5 people see the flop, the pot is 21SBFlop: 3
10
K
SB check, BB check, I check, wrto bets, CO+1 folds, SB calls, BB calls, I raise, wrto 3-bets, SB folds, BB calls (all-in), I cap, wrto callsI go for a check/raise here because I want to build the pot and also to charge the flush draws more (though it won't get rid of them). I'm pretty sure I'm way ahead as I figure wrto has AK or AA. If he has KK then he's going to get a nice pot from me.3 people see the turn, pot is 16BBTurn: 9
I bet, wrto raises, I call.I have to call the raise. After the raise I'm not too happy with my hand anymore. Either wrto has KK so I'm dead to the 3 or he has AK of spades and just made the nut flush. Getting 19-1 on my call I have to call and if I don't improve I check/call the river since there is a small chance wrto has AK or AA w/o the flush.2 people see the river, pot is 20BBRiver: K
I bet, wrto callsI hit my full house and lead out. With the board pairing, I only see wrto betting if he has KK so I want to charge him to show down AK or AA. If he has KK for quads then more power to him. I'd only call a raise though as it means I'm probably beat.At the time, I thought I played the hand well, but the more I think about it the more I think I just got lucky and played it too aggressively.
0
