grocery_mony 9 Posted July 19, 2007 Share Posted July 19, 2007 Jon Lovitz and Andy ****.http://www.nypost.com/seven/07172007/gossi...six/pagesix.htmLol, i hate that guy. Link to post Share on other sites
SuitedAces21 2,741 Posted July 19, 2007 Share Posted July 19, 2007 Obviously J Lovitz. Link to post Share on other sites
speedz99 145 Posted July 19, 2007 Share Posted July 19, 2007 How about a gorilla versus a shark in a 2 foot deep tank of water? Link to post Share on other sites
aadams_22 3 Posted July 19, 2007 Share Posted July 19, 2007 Jon Lovitz sits on Andy Dick and both win. Jon Lovitz wins by killing Andy Dick while Andy wins by going out doing what he loves best...spooning ass. Link to post Share on other sites
SuitedAces21 2,741 Posted July 19, 2007 Share Posted July 19, 2007 Jon Lovitz sits on Andy Dick and both win. Jon Lovitz wins by killing Andy Dick while Andy wins by going out doing what he loves best...eating box.FYP. Link to post Share on other sites
Dogpatch 2 Posted July 19, 2007 Share Posted July 19, 2007 Jon LovitzBTW, my favorite Jon Lovitz moment. The Wedding Singer: "He's losing his mind... and I'm reaping all of the benefits."The gorilla would win in 2ft of water, but the shark would win in anything over 5ft of water. Link to post Share on other sites
coesillian 0 Posted July 19, 2007 Share Posted July 19, 2007 how about a tiger and a shark in 2 feet of water and a 25 foot diameter pool Link to post Share on other sites
Dogpatch 2 Posted July 19, 2007 Share Posted July 19, 2007 how about a tiger and a shark in 2 feet of water and a 25 foot diameter poolI have to give it to the shark here. Most of the tiger's body will be under so his movement will be hindered. His head will barely be above the water so he won't have good visibility on the shark. Link to post Share on other sites
Jargonator 0 Posted July 19, 2007 Share Posted July 19, 2007 I have to give it to the shark here. Most of the tiger's body will be under so his movement will be hindered. His head will barely be above the water so he won't have good visibility on the shark.Tiger FTW, Average Height of a tiger is 3 feet so water only up to shoulders prob. plus many tigers spend alot of their time in the water to keep cool and hunt prey around the river/lake so I don't think speed/agility would be affected top much, And if it's just 2 feet of water the shark will have to be pretty small to be fully submerged to make full advantage of it's speed. Link to post Share on other sites
coesillian 0 Posted July 19, 2007 Share Posted July 19, 2007 Tiger FTW, Average Height of a tiger is 3 feet so water only up to shoulders prob. plus many tigers spend alot of their time in the water to keep cool and hunt prey around the river/lake so I don't think speed/agility would be affected top much, And if it's just 2 feet of water the shark will have to be pretty small to be fully submerged to make full advantage of it's speed. I think that a paw hit by the tiger would not inflict enough damage on the shark whereas one bite from the shark would be nearly crippling to the tiger. As soon as the tiger got injured it would be a lost battle but the shark can take a couple hits before it becomes fatally injured. Shark FTW. Link to post Share on other sites
Dogpatch 2 Posted July 19, 2007 Share Posted July 19, 2007 Tiger FTW, Average Height of a tiger is 3 feet so water only up to shoulders prob. plus many tigers spend alot of their time in the water to keep cool and hunt prey around the river/lake so I don't think speed/agility would be affected top much, And if it's just 2 feet of water the shark will have to be pretty small to be fully submerged to make full advantage of it's speed.Yup. The average height is 3 feet. So, 2/3rds of it's body underwater... low visibility... and plenty of room for the shark to attack from any angle... see below.I think that a paw hit by the tiger would not inflict enough damage on the shark whereas one bite from the shark would be nearly crippling to the tiger. As soon as the tiger got injured it would be a lost battle but the shark can take a couple hits before it becomes fatally injured. Shark FTW.Exactly. The tiger will have a hard time delivering a hit anyway as it's paw will have to travel through some water first. The shark will most likely remove a limb from the tiger with the very least of a bite. It has the capability to gut the tiger in one bite.If the tank were very small and the shark could only come at the tiger from the front... I'd give the tiger a better chance. But in this tank... it's the shark FTW. Unless Humberto Brennes is pushing the shark. Link to post Share on other sites
DoinSublime 0 Posted July 19, 2007 Share Posted July 19, 2007 Who will win between an ill-fitted, overflowing coffee pot full of scalding hot coffee, or the skin on my hand?I assure you the coffee would (did ) win. Link to post Share on other sites
Dogpatch 2 Posted July 19, 2007 Share Posted July 19, 2007 Who would win in a fight between the girl in your avatar's throat and my hand? Link to post Share on other sites
DoinSublime 0 Posted July 19, 2007 Share Posted July 19, 2007 Who would win in a fight between the girl in your avatar's throat and my hand?Well, if you got video of it, I think we'd all end up a winner, no matter what the outcome. Link to post Share on other sites
Dogpatch 2 Posted July 19, 2007 Share Posted July 19, 2007 Well, if you got video of it, I think we'd all end up a winner, no matter what the outcome.So true. Link to post Share on other sites
coesillian 0 Posted July 19, 2007 Share Posted July 19, 2007 So true. A question about this choking business, I have but very slight choking experience, pretty much just a little squeeze as was fit with the moment. Is choking meant to pleasure the choker or the chokee. I hear it makes orgasms better when your running out of air, but are you getting a rush off of the power when you’re applying your choke hold? Are you doing this for own enjoyment or are you being a sweety pie and doing it for her pleasure? Link to post Share on other sites
Dogpatch 2 Posted July 19, 2007 Share Posted July 19, 2007 A question about this choking business, I have but very slight choking experience, pretty much just a little squeeze as was fit with the moment. Is choking meant to pleasure the choker or the chokee. I hear it makes orgasms better when your running out of air, but are you getting a rush off of the power when you're applying your choke hold? Are you doing this for own enjoyment or are you being a sweety pie and doing it for her pleasure?It absolutely goes both ways. It is for the enjoyment of both partners and I would never force choking on someone who was not cool with it.For the person applying the choke, there is a feeling of power... of holding a life in your hand. But this can not be the only focus, and if that is the only enjoyment you get from it... it's a slippery slope to real danger. Personally... I can let some aggression and frustration out during a choking, but I feel I'm fairly advanced at it and can control it. If a novice choker were to start envisioning violence during a choke, they could lose control easily.For the person being choked, it can be enjoyable two ways. One being the feeling of submitting to another person. The other would be the euphoria you described of climaxing while being short on oxygen. I know I've made many jokes about choking, and it can be funny... but I'm also well aware of the danger and I hope I've stressed the dangers involved. As I said, I would never force it on anyone. It is about both partners and not just an ego trip, as I'm sure many men would imagine it to be. Link to post Share on other sites
JoeyJoJo 20 Posted July 19, 2007 Share Posted July 19, 2007 How about a gorilla versus a shark in a 2 foot deep tank of water?Shark obviously.The real question is who would win in a fight between a rampaging bull and a fallen human?Rampaging Bull - 1Fallen Human - 0 Link to post Share on other sites
RodReynolds 96 Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 Shark obviously.The real question is who would win in a fight between a rampaging bull and a fallen human?Rampaging Bull - 1Fallen Human - 0hi Link to post Share on other sites
runthemover 40 Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 hiannyong Link to post Share on other sites
SuitedAces21 2,741 Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 annyongannyong. Link to post Share on other sites
ShakeZuma 586 Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 Rampaging Bull - 1Fallen Human - 0 hiits like when an old character that everybody loved comes back to a tv show. and no, nothing rodreynolds has ever posted could be considered annoying. NOTHING. Link to post Share on other sites
aadams_22 3 Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 The real question is who would win in a fight between a rampaging bull and a fallen human?Rampaging Bull - 1Fallen Human - 0 Link to post Share on other sites
SuitedAces21 2,741 Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 and no, nothing rodreynolds has ever posted could be considered annoying. NOTHING.annyong. Link to post Share on other sites
runthemover 40 Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 annyong and no, nothing rodreynolds has ever posted could be considered annoying. NOTHING.I agree with your statement. you should probably read over the posts again. Maybe something totally went over my head. I can see why you could've misread it though. It's an Arrested Development thing. you should watch. choppy sentences. It just happened. I decided to roll with it. What's a conjunction? Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now