Yeah, calling would have been a smart move here. I wanted to see how many advocated calling here as opposed to the line I chose.
In the end, I decided the BB most likely had a good pair below K (like 88 through QQ). As I said, I doubted that he had a set based on how he chose to play the hand (check flop, weak lead turn).
I decided that either the Button had a monster, or he had air (like in the other hand I posted) and *strongly* felt that he just had air here. Since I could see him raising both types of hands here if I call, I decided to pre-empt, and raised it $90 to $126-to-go (taking away any fancy play here). If the BB had a mid pocket pair, he couldn't stand my raise.
I figured my raise here would still fit in the BB's mind with a big hand, because although I checked the flop, I was checking to a *known* aggressive player who had put in the last raise pre-flop. Also the flop was dry of most draws (QJ is the only likely one here and you wouldn't expect it to survive the preflop action...) so a big hand could reasonably check here. I thought $126 would be enough for the BB to feel his entire stack is at risk (he would expect a large river bet if he calls, even though I am only betting if I catch one of my outs).
As for the button, well his entire stack *was* at risk, so unless I misread him, he was folding.
In the end, both opponents folded, although the BB timed all the way down and typed:
BB: "q,q no good ?"
I tend to believe his question here. It certainly fit with how he played the hand, just like sabes99 observed.
Thanks guys,
Merby
I like the reasoning behind your decision. I think if villain is unknown, calling is a safer line.